Suppr超能文献

慢性病负担评估(ABCC-)工具:一种用于髋、膝、手、腕、足和踝关节骨关节炎的有效且可靠的工具。

The Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC-) tool: A valid and reliable tool for hip, knee, hand, wrist, foot and ankle osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Debie V H J, Boymans T A E J, Gidding-Slok A H M, van Schayck O C P, Ottenheijm R P G

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2025 May 21;7(3):100623. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100623. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC-) tool was developed to provide a comprehensive, holistic evaluation of disease burden on physical, emotional and social level in patients with one or more chronic conditions. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the recently developed module for the ABCC-tool for osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among patients with hip, knee, hand, wrist, foot and ankle OA. Validity was assessed as (1) the convergent validity with three OA-joint-specific questionnaires measuring pain and stiffness amongst others; (2) the discriminant validity with radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) scores; and (3) known-groups validity (groups: number of affected joints, and the presence/absence of anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing). Reliability was assessed as the (1) internal consistency; and (2) test-retest with a two-week interval.

RESULTS

409 OA patients were included. For all joints its convergent validity was according to the hypothesis, i.e. r ​≥ ​0.7 (hip OA r ​= ​-0.73; knee OA r ​= ​-0.75; hand and wrist OA r ​= ​0.74; foot and ankle OA r ​= ​-0.41). As expected according to the hypothesis, no correlation between burden of OA and KL-scores was found for the discriminant validity. The ABCC-tool was able to distinguish all predefined known-groups (all ​< ​0.05). The ABCC-tool demonstrated good internal consistency across all domains and joints (total scale in all joints ≥0.87). Test-retest reliability was high (all ICC ≥0.81).

CONCLUSION

The ABCC-tool is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the multidimensional burden of OA across different joints.

摘要

目的

慢性病负担评估(ABCC-)工具旨在全面、整体地评估患有一种或多种慢性病的患者在身体、情感和社会层面的疾病负担。本研究旨在评估最近开发的骨关节炎(OA)ABCC工具模块的有效性和可靠性。

设计

对髋、膝、手、腕、足和踝OA患者进行了一项基于问卷的横断面研究。有效性评估如下:(1)与三份测量疼痛和僵硬等情况的OA关节特异性问卷的收敛效度;(2)与放射学Kellgren-Lawrence(KL)评分的区分效度;(3)已知组效度(分组:受累关节数量,以及焦虑、抑郁、运动恐惧和疼痛灾难化的存在与否)。可靠性评估如下:(1)内部一致性;(2)间隔两周的重测。

结果

纳入409例OA患者。对于所有关节,其收敛效度符合假设,即r≥0.7(髋OA,r = -0.73;膝OA,r = -0.75;手和腕OA,r = 0.74;足和踝OA,r = -0.41)。根据假设预期,区分效度方面未发现OA负担与KL评分之间存在相关性。ABCC工具能够区分所有预定义的已知组(所有P<0.05)。ABCC工具在所有领域和关节中均表现出良好的内部一致性(所有关节的总量表≥0.87)。重测信度较高(所有组内相关系数≥0.81)。

结论

ABCC工具是评估不同关节OA多维负担的有效且可靠的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132c/12164024/3377436836c6/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验