Laytner Lindsey A, Chen Patricia, Trautner Barbara Wells, Nash Susan, Collazo Ashley, Faustinella Fabrizia, Olmeda Kiara, Mancera Azalia, Zoorob Roger, Paasche-Orlow Michael K, Grigoryan Larissa
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
VA Center for Innovations in Quality Effectiveness and Safety, Houston, Texas, USA.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jun 3;3(1):e002421. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-002421. eCollection 2025.
Using antibiotics without a prescription (non-prescription use) is common in the USA and contributes to antibiotic misuse, potentially harming individuals and threatening public health. At the individual level, safety issues related to non-prescription use include adverse drug reactions and disruption of healthy microbiomes. At the public health level, non-prescription use increases the risk of antimicrobial resistance.
This qualitative study explored the reasons and motivations underlying non-prescription use among adult outpatients with varying healthcare coverage and education.
We used purposive sampling to recruit participants who endorsed using non-prescription antibiotics in a larger quantitative survey. Participants were patients recruited from six public and two private clinics in Houston and Katy, Texas. All interviews were semistructured and conducted remotely by trained research coordinators in the participant's preferred language (English or Spanish). Interviews captured elements from two domains of the Kilbourne Theoretical Framework for Advancing Health Disparities Research, including patients' attitudes and beliefs, resources and various healthcare-system factors that could impact non-prescription use. Thematic analysis revealed the factors and situations that contribute to non-prescription use.
Of 86 participants surveyed, 72% were female and 24% had Medicare or private insurance. Our thematic analyses on why participants use non-prescription antibiotics are organised into two domains: (1) patient beliefs and experiences and (2) healthcare system barriers. Patient beliefs and experiences revealed four themes: (1) belief that antibiotics relieve many symptoms/illnesses (eg, pain, sore throat, if symptoms/illnesses are persistent, lingering or severe), (2) belief that patients know their own bodies (eg, participants' perceived self-efficacy in knowing and using medications for their illnesses/symptoms), (3) belief that over-the-counter medicines do not work and (4) belief that antibiotics are like gold (eg, antibiotics are difficult to obtain, valuable and highly effective). Healthcare system barriers revealed two themes: (1) patients encounter obstacles to healthcare (eg, transportation, long wait times, high healthcare costs and lack of reliable telemedicine options) and (2) patients express convenience in using non-prescription antibiotics from multiple sources (eg, leftover prescriptions, social networks or purchased without a prescription).
Barriers to care, the convenience of obtaining non-prescription antibiotics, and patients' beliefs regarding the powerful value of antibiotics and their agency to direct this aspect of care present challenges that need to be explored to design effective outpatient antibiotic stewardship programmes.
在美国,无处方使用抗生素(非处方使用)的情况很常见,这导致了抗生素的滥用,可能会对个人造成伤害并威胁公众健康。在个体层面,与非处方使用相关的安全问题包括药物不良反应和健康微生物群的破坏。在公共卫生层面,非处方使用增加了抗菌药物耐药性的风险。
这项定性研究探讨了不同医保覆盖范围和教育程度的成年门诊患者非处方使用抗生素的原因和动机。
我们采用目的抽样法,从一项更大规模的定量调查中招募认可使用非处方抗生素的参与者。参与者是从得克萨斯州休斯顿和凯蒂的六家公立诊所和两家私立诊所招募的患者。所有访谈均为半结构化,由经过培训的研究协调员以参与者首选的语言(英语或西班牙语)进行远程访谈。访谈涵盖了推进健康差异研究的基尔伯恩理论框架的两个领域的要素,包括患者的态度和信念、资源以及可能影响非处方使用的各种医疗系统因素。主题分析揭示了导致非处方使用的因素和情况。
在接受调查的86名参与者中,72%为女性,24%拥有医疗保险或私人保险。我们对参与者使用非处方抗生素原因的主题分析分为两个领域:(1)患者的信念和经历;(2)医疗系统障碍。患者的信念和经历揭示了四个主题:(1)认为抗生素能缓解多种症状/疾病(如疼痛、喉咙痛,如果症状/疾病持续、迁延或严重);(2)认为患者了解自己的身体(如参与者在了解和使用治疗疾病/症状的药物方面的自我效能感);(3)认为非处方药不起作用;(4)认为抗生素如黄金般珍贵(如抗生素难以获得、有价值且高效)。医疗系统障碍揭示了两个主题:(1)患者在获得医疗服务方面遇到障碍(如交通、长时间等待、高昂的医疗费用以及缺乏可靠的远程医疗选择);(2)患者表示从多个来源使用非处方抗生素很方便(如剩余处方、社交网络或无处方购买)。
医疗服务障碍、获取非处方抗生素的便利性,以及患者对抗生素强大价值的信念及其在指导这方面医疗服务的自主性,都带来了挑战,需要加以探索以设计有效的门诊抗生素管理计划。