Karamitros Georgios, Furnas Heather J, Grant Michael P, Goulas Sofoklis
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/drheatherfurnas.
Surgery. 2025 Aug;184:109478. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109478. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
Gender disparities in academic surgery persist, with women underrepresented as first authors and facing significant barriers to research productivity. Family-supportive policies, including paid family leave and reproductive rights protections, have been suggested as potential solutions to mitigate these disparities. However, their impact on women representation in surgical research has not been comprehensively evaluated.
This cross-sectional analysis, using a web-scraping methodology, examined 198,542 first-author publications from 388 PubMed-indexed surgery journals published between 2010 and 2022. Gender differences in research output and representation were assessed across US states with and without family-supportive policies, specifically mandatory paid family leave and protective reproductive rights. We compared women representation among first authors and analyzed the average publication count for women authors, examining gender disparities at publication thresholds of 1, 2, and 5 papers.
Women comprised 33.0% of all first authors, with representation decreasing at higher publication thresholds. States with paid family leave showed higher women representation among first authors compared with non-paid family leave states (34.2% vs 32.3%; P < .001), and similarly, protective reproductive rights states had more women representation than restrictive states (33.9% vs 32.0%; P < .001). Among authors with 5 or more publications, women represented 25.1% in paid family leave states versus 22.6% in non-paid family leave states (P = .005), and 24.6% in reproductive rights states versus 22.3% in restrictive states (P = .010). Women in states with these policies also saw significantly higher average publication counts (P < .001).
State-level paid family leave and reproductive rights policies are associated with improved women representation and reduced gender disparities in surgical research. Our results indicate a statistically significant association between family-supportive policies and increased women's authorship, suggesting that such policies may play a role in shaping the academic trajectories of women in surgery.
学术外科领域存在性别差异,女性作为第一作者的比例较低,且在研究产出方面面临重大障碍。包括带薪产假和生殖权利保护在内的家庭支持政策被认为是缓解这些差异的潜在解决方案。然而,它们对外科研究中女性代表性的影响尚未得到全面评估。
本横断面分析采用网络抓取方法,研究了2010年至2022年期间388种被PubMed索引的外科期刊上的198,542篇第一作者论文。在美国有和没有家庭支持政策(特别是强制性带薪产假和保护性生殖权利)的州,评估了研究产出和代表性方面的性别差异。我们比较了第一作者中女性的代表性,并分析了女性作者的平均论文发表数量,研究了在发表1篇、2篇和5篇论文的阈值下的性别差异。
女性占所有第一作者的33.0%,在较高的发表阈值下代表性下降。有带薪产假的州与没有带薪产假的州相比,第一作者中女性的代表性更高(34.2%对32.3%;P <.001),同样,有保护性生殖权利的州比限制生殖权利的州有更多女性代表(33.9%对32.0%;P <.001)。在发表5篇或更多论文的作者中,带薪产假州的女性占25.1%,无带薪产假州的女性占22.6%(P =.005),生殖权利州的女性占24.6%,限制生殖权利州的女性占22.3%(P =.010)。实施这些政策的州的女性平均发表数量也显著更高(P <.001)。
州一级的带薪产假和生殖权利政策与外科研究中女性代表性的提高以及性别差异的减少相关。我们的结果表明,家庭支持政策与女性作者数量增加之间存在统计学上的显著关联,这表明此类政策可能在塑造女性外科医生的学术轨迹方面发挥作用。