Kerget Ferhan, Erkuş Edip, Kerget Buğra, Tör İbrahim Hakkı
Department of Infection Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Erzurum City Hospital, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Department of Nephrology, Health Sciences University, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Türkiye.
Eurasian J Med. 2025 Jun 13;57(2):1-6. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2025.25813.
Background: In this study, the aim was to assess the association between procalcitonin levels and culture positivity in patients with acute renal failure (ARF) admitted to the intensive care unit due to Type 1 and Type 2 respiratory failure. Methods: About 128 patients with ARF were restrospectively included between January 2022 and December 2023. Based on admission culture results, patients were grouped as infection-positive (n=40) or infection negative (n=88). Laboratory parameters, particularly procalcitonin levels, were compared. Results: Platelet levels were significantly higher in patients with positive culture results (P=.03), while procalcitonin levels did not differ between groups (P=.33). Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated microorganism (25%), with the urinary tract being the most common site of growth. In culture- positive patients, procalcitonin levels exhibited a stronger negative correlation with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (R=-0.355, P= .02) and a positive correlation with creatinine (R=0.385, P= .01), highlighting the impact of renal function. Additionally, procalcitonin levels were positively correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP) (R=0.586, P < .001) and negatively correlated with serum sodium (R=-0.39, P=.01) in patients with culture growth. As a secondary observation, platelet levels were elevated in patients with positive cultures. Conclusion: Although procalcitonin is a recognized marker for infection and sepsis, its diagnostic reliability appears limited in critically ill patients with ARF due to its association with renal dysfunction. Additionally, defining infection based solely on culture positivity has inherent limitations, and further research including comprehensive clinical and laboratory parameters is warranted.
在本研究中,目的是评估因1型和2型呼吸衰竭入住重症监护病房的急性肾衰竭(ARF)患者中降钙素原水平与培养阳性之间的关联。方法:回顾性纳入2022年1月至2023年12月期间的约128例ARF患者。根据入院培养结果,将患者分为感染阳性组(n = 40)和感染阴性组(n = 88)。比较实验室参数,特别是降钙素原水平。结果:培养结果阳性的患者血小板水平显著更高(P = .03),而两组之间降钙素原水平无差异(P = .33)。大肠杆菌是最常分离出的微生物(25%),尿路是最常见的生长部位。在培养阳性的患者中,降钙素原水平与肾小球滤过率(GFR)呈更强的负相关(R = -0.355,P = .02),与肌酐呈正相关(R = 0.385,P = .01),突出了肾功能的影响。此外,培养有细菌生长的患者中,降钙素原水平与C反应蛋白(CRP)呈正相关(R = 0.586,P < .001),与血清钠呈负相关(R = -0.39,P = .01)。作为次要观察结果,培养阳性的患者血小板水平升高。结论:尽管降钙素原是感染和脓毒症的公认标志物,但由于其与肾功能障碍有关,其在ARF重症患者中的诊断可靠性似乎有限。此外,仅基于培养阳性来定义感染有其内在局限性,因此有必要开展包括综合临床和实验室参数的进一步研究。