• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估中风患者肢体失用症的常用工具使用测试中文版的效度验证。

Validation of Chinese version of the familiar tools use test for assessing limb apraxia in stroke patients.

作者信息

Wang Jinni, Wei Jingxin, Chen Meilian, Gao Lu, Liao Xiaoyan

机构信息

School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 3;16:1578179. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1578179. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1578179
PMID:40529449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12172506/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Familiar Tools Use Test (FTT) of the Diagnostic Instrument for Limb Apraxia-Short Version in Chinese stroke patients.

METHODS

Participants were conveniently enrolled from a neurology ward in a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou, China, between April 2023 and September 2023. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, dimensionality, convergent validity, and divergent validity were examined.

RESULTS

In total, 110 ischemic stroke patients were included. The FTT demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.70-0.75), test-retest reliability (ICC 0.88-0.99, 95%CI), and inter-rater reliability (Kappa coefficients ranging from 0.83 to 1.00, 0.001). Exploratory factor analysis extracted one common factor for tool selection and two common factors for action execution. There were mild to moderate correlations between the scores of the FTT scales and the MoCA ( ranged from 0.37 to 0.50), indicating satisfactory convergent and divergent validity. The moderate correlations between the scores of the FTT scales and the PTU ( ranged from 0.49 to 0.51), indicating satisfactory concurrent validity. The prevalence of limb apraxia in patients with left brain damage when selecting, producing, and executing familiar tools were 14.9, 8.5, and 8.5%, respectively. While, the prevalence of apraxia during similar tasks in those with right brain damage were 3.0, 0, and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The FTT was reliable and valid for assessing limb apraxia among Chinese ischemic stroke patients.

摘要

目的

验证中文版肢体失用症诊断工具简版中的常用工具使用测试(FTT)在中风患者中的有效性。

方法

2023年4月至2023年9月期间,在中国广州一家三级医院的神经内科病房方便地招募了参与者。检查了内部一致性、重测信度、评分者间信度、维度、收敛效度和区分效度。

结果

共纳入110例缺血性中风患者。FTT表现出令人满意的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.70 - 0.75)、重测信度(ICC 0.88 - 0.99,95%CI)和评分者间信度(Kappa系数范围为0.83至1.00,P < 0.001)。探索性因素分析提取了一个用于工具选择的共同因素和两个用于动作执行的共同因素。FTT量表得分与MoCA之间存在轻度至中度相关性(范围为0.37至0.50),表明具有令人满意的收敛效度和区分效度。FTT量表得分与PTU之间存在中度相关性(范围为0.49至0.51),表明具有令人满意的同时效度。左脑损伤患者在选择、制作和执行常用工具时肢体失用症的患病率分别为14.9%、8.5%和8.5%。而右脑损伤患者在类似任务中的失用症患病率分别为3.0%、0%和0%。

结论

FTT在评估中国缺血性中风患者的肢体失用症方面是可靠且有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/090f/12172506/4b7f1c354f4b/fneur-16-1578179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/090f/12172506/4b7f1c354f4b/fneur-16-1578179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/090f/12172506/4b7f1c354f4b/fneur-16-1578179-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of Chinese version of the familiar tools use test for assessing limb apraxia in stroke patients.用于评估中风患者肢体失用症的常用工具使用测试中文版的效度验证。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 3;16:1578179. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1578179. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
3
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
4
Assessing limb apraxia after ischemic stroke: validation of the Chinese version of the diagnostic instrument for limb apraxia-short version (DILA-S) classic subtests.评估缺血性脑卒中后的肢体失用症:肢体失用症诊断工具(DILA-S)经典子测验中文版的验证。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2024 May;31(4):390-398. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2267267. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
5
Validation of the Chinese Patient Participation Scale (PPS-C) in Internal Medicine Patient: A Psychometric Study.中文版患者参与量表(PPS-C)在内科患者中的效度验证:一项心理测量学研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jun 10;19:1703-1715. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S518317. eCollection 2025.
6
Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10): Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Azerbaijani-Turkish Version.嗓音障碍指数-10(VHI-10):阿塞拜疆-土耳其语版本的跨文化调适与验证
J Voice. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.05.025.
7
Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation.用于中风康复的虚拟现实技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD008349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub5.
8
Validation of the Chinese version of the financial toxicity scale in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration.湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者中文版财务毒性量表的验证
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Jun 16;9(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00909-x.
9
Validity and psychometric characteristics of the psoriatic arthritis quality of life (PSAQoL) questionnaire in the Turkish population.银屑病关节炎生活质量(PSAQoL)问卷在土耳其人群中的效度和心理测量学特征。
Rheumatol Int. 2025 Jun 16;45(7):155. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05911-6.
10
Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the longer-term Unmet Needs after Stroke monitoring tool for stroke patients.中文版中风患者长期未满足需求监测工具的心理测量学验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Oct 30:1-7. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2422467.

本文引用的文献

1
The Montreal cognitive assessment: normative data from a large, population-based sample of Chinese healthy adults and validation for detecting vascular cognitive impairment.蒙特利尔认知评估:来自中国健康成年人大型人群样本的常模数据及检测血管性认知障碍的效度验证
Front Neurosci. 2024 Jul 31;18:1455129. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1455129. eCollection 2024.
2
Sample size determination for conducting a pilot study to assess reliability of a questionnaire.确定进行一项预试验以评估问卷可靠性的样本量。
Restor Dent Endod. 2024 Jan 10;49(1):e3. doi: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e3. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Assessing limb apraxia after ischemic stroke: validation of the Chinese version of the diagnostic instrument for limb apraxia-short version (DILA-S) classic subtests.
评估缺血性脑卒中后的肢体失用症:肢体失用症诊断工具(DILA-S)经典子测验中文版的验证。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2024 May;31(4):390-398. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2267267. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
4
Human Neuroimaging Reveals Differences in Activation and Connectivity between Real and Pantomimed Tool Use.人类神经影像学揭示了真实和模拟工具使用之间在激活和连通性上的差异。
J Neurosci. 2023 Nov 15;43(46):7853-7867. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0068-23.2023. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
5
Limb Apraxias: The Influence of Higher Order Perceptual and Semantic Deficits in Motor Recovery After Stroke.肢体失用症:高阶感知和语义缺陷对中风后运动恢复的影响
Stroke. 2023 Jan;54(1):30-43. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.037948. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
6
100 years after Liepmann-Lesion correlates of diminished selection and application of familiar versus novel tools.利普森病灶与熟悉工具与新颖工具选择和应用减少的关联 100 年后。
Cortex. 2022 Jan;146:1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
7
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990—2019年全球、区域和国家的卒中负担及其风险因素:全球疾病负担研究2019的系统分析
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
8
Conversion between Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores in older adults undergoing selective surgery using Rasch analysis.使用 Rasch 分析对接受选择性手术的老年人进行简易精神状态检查和蒙特利尔认知评估分数的转换。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Feb;77(2):729-741. doi: 10.1111/jan.14638. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
9
Acute Ischemic Stroke: Management Approach.急性缺血性卒中:治疗方法
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;23(Suppl 2):S140-S146. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23192.
10
[Formula: see text] Limb apraxia profiles in different clinical samples.不同临床样本中的肢体失用症特征。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Jan;34(1):217-242. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1585575. Epub 2019 Apr 19.