• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院所有权对接受血运重建的ST段抬高型心肌梗死所致心源性休克患者预后的影响:一项回顾性队列研究

Influence of Hospital Ownership on Patient Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction-Induced Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Revascularization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Malik Mushrin, Sequeira Gross Juan C, Francis-Morel Garry

机构信息

Internal Medicine, St. Barnabas Hospital Health System, New York, USA.

Internal Medicine, Family Health Center of Southwest Florida, Fort Myers, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 May 20;17(5):e84471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84471. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.84471
PMID:40539141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12178224/
Abstract

Background The healthcare landscape is notably divided between investor-owned and nonprofit hospitals, raising questions about the impact of hospital ownership on patient outcomes, especially for high-stakes conditions such as cardiogenic shock resulting from ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study analyzed whether differences in hospital ownership are associated with variations in mortality, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare costs. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2021, identifying 95,260 adult patients with STEMI-induced cardiogenic shock treated with PCI. Identification was based on validated International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding algorithms. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with LOS and total hospital charges (inflation-adjusted via the Consumer Price Index) as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were assessed using multivariable regression models adjusting for patient demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity), comorbidities, insurance type, and hospital-level factors (region, teaching status, and bed size). Regional cost variation and case mix were also accounted for. Propensity score matching was additionally performed to validate results. Results The analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality rates between investor-owned (27.22%) and nonprofit hospitals (26.93%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.03, p = 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.91-1.16). Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed similar findings (aOR = 0.98, p = 0.696). Investor-owned hospitals, however, incurred significantly higher healthcare costs (average charges = $325,543 vs. $222,528; p < 0.001). The average cost difference of $103,015.50 remained statistically and systemically significant after adjustment and may reflect differences in resource utilization and/or billing practices. LOS was slightly shorter in investor-owned hospitals (6.51 vs. 7.27 days); while statistically significant (p < 0.001), this difference was not clinically meaningful after adjustment (coefficient = 0.19, p = 0.334). Key demographic and clinical predictors included age, insurance status, comorbidity index, hospital bed size, and teaching status. Racial and insurance-based disparities, particularly among Hispanic patients and Medicaid enrollees, were associated with higher costs, though not fully explained by hospital ownership. Conclusions In this national analysis, hospital ownership was not associated with differences in mortality for STEMI-induced cardiogenic shock treated with PCI, but was independently associated with substantially higher hospital charges in investor-owned hospitals. These findings demonstrate association, not causation, and highlight the need for future research into cost drivers and initiatives to promote high-value, standardized care across all hospital types.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/57ef7fad0c4f/cureus-0017-00000084471-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/d1f5d0c4c775/cureus-0017-00000084471-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/d333d42a5dcd/cureus-0017-00000084471-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/c072fb40cc5e/cureus-0017-00000084471-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/fa928e0fc281/cureus-0017-00000084471-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/a0afbd49c233/cureus-0017-00000084471-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/ca225068434f/cureus-0017-00000084471-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/334c8a73b4d8/cureus-0017-00000084471-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/359b2488c0b3/cureus-0017-00000084471-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/2f07bf6f103a/cureus-0017-00000084471-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/57ef7fad0c4f/cureus-0017-00000084471-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/d1f5d0c4c775/cureus-0017-00000084471-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/d333d42a5dcd/cureus-0017-00000084471-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/c072fb40cc5e/cureus-0017-00000084471-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/fa928e0fc281/cureus-0017-00000084471-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/a0afbd49c233/cureus-0017-00000084471-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/ca225068434f/cureus-0017-00000084471-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/334c8a73b4d8/cureus-0017-00000084471-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/359b2488c0b3/cureus-0017-00000084471-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/2f07bf6f103a/cureus-0017-00000084471-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a98/12178224/57ef7fad0c4f/cureus-0017-00000084471-i10.jpg
摘要

背景

医疗保健领域显著地分为投资者所有的医院和非营利性医院,这引发了关于医院所有权对患者治疗结果影响的问题,尤其是对于诸如经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)所致心源性休克等高风险病症。本研究分析了医院所有权的差异是否与死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和医疗费用的变化相关。

方法

我们使用2016年至2021年的全国住院患者样本(NIS)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,识别出95260例接受PCI治疗的STEMI诱发心源性休克的成年患者。识别基于经过验证的国际疾病分类第十版临床修订版编码算法。主要结局是院内死亡率,住院时间和总住院费用(通过消费者价格指数进行通胀调整)作为次要结局。所有结局均使用多变量回归模型进行评估,该模型对患者人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、种族/民族)、合并症、保险类型和医院层面因素(地区、教学状况和床位规模)进行了调整。还考虑了地区成本差异和病例组合。另外进行了倾向得分匹配以验证结果。

结果

分析显示投资者所有的医院(27.22%)和非营利性医院(26.93%)之间的死亡率没有显著差异(调整后的优势比(aOR)=1.03,p=0.60;95%置信区间(CI)=0.91-1.16)。倾向得分匹配分析证实了类似的结果(aOR=0.98,p=0.696)。然而,投资者所有的医院产生的医疗费用显著更高(平均费用=325543美元对222528美元;p<0.001)。调整后103015.50美元的平均成本差异在统计学和系统层面上仍然显著,这可能反映了资源利用和/或计费实践的差异。投资者所有的医院的住院时间略短(6.51天对7.27天);虽然具有统计学显著性(p<0.001),但调整后这种差异在临床上并无意义(系数=0.19,p=0.334)。关键的人口统计学和临床预测因素包括年龄、保险状况、合并症指数、医院床位规模和教学状况。基于种族和保险的差异,特别是在西班牙裔患者和医疗补助参保者中,与更高的费用相关,尽管不能完全由医院所有权来解释。

结论

在这项全国性分析中,医院所有权与接受PCI治疗的STEMI诱发心源性休克的死亡率差异无关,但与投资者所有的医院中显著更高的医院费用独立相关。这些发现表明存在关联而非因果关系,并强调未来需要对成本驱动因素以及促进所有类型医院提供高价值、标准化护理的举措进行研究。

相似文献

1
Influence of Hospital Ownership on Patient Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction-Induced Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Revascularization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.医院所有权对接受血运重建的ST段抬高型心肌梗死所致心源性休克患者预后的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Cureus. 2025 May 20;17(5):e84471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84471. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
3
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
6
Effects of a gluten-reduced or gluten-free diet for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.减少或无麸质饮食对心血管疾病一级预防的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 24;2(2):CD013556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013556.pub2.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards.急性成人病房患者恶化的预防用早期预警系统和快速反应系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 22;11(11):CD005529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005529.pub3.
9
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的饮食预防高血压(DASH)方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 6;5(5):CD013729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013729.pub2.
10
Early readmissions after percutaneous mechanical circulatory support-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the nationwide readmissions database.经皮机械循环支持辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的早期再入院:来自全国再入院数据库的见解
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.06.002.

本文引用的文献

1
Age‑adjusted Charlson comorbidity index and in‑hospital mortality in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock: A retrospective cohort study.年龄校正的Charlson合并症指数与心源性休克重症患者的院内死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Exp Ther Med. 2023 May 5;25(6):299. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.11998. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Uninsured Compared With Privately Insured Individuals.未参保与有私人保险个体的急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克的管理和预后。
Circ Heart Fail. 2022 May;15(5):e008991. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008991. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
3
Comparative Analysis of Patient Characteristics in Cardiogenic Shock Studies: Differences Between Trials and Registries.
比较心源性休克研究中患者特征的分析:试验与注册研究之间的差异。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb 14;15(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.11.036.
4
Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Pathophysiology, Evaluation and Management Considerations: Review of Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭相关性心源性休克:病理生理学、评估与管理考量:心力衰竭相关性心源性休克综述
J Card Fail. 2021 Oct;27(10):1126-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.08.010.
5
Impact of Age on Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.年龄对心源性休克患者预后的影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 23;8:688098. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.688098. eCollection 2021.
6
Quality and Cost of Care by Hospital Teaching Status: What Are the Differences?医院教学地位对医疗质量和成本的影响:有何不同?
Milbank Q. 2021 Mar;99(1):273-327. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12502.
7
Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Disparities in Patients With STEMI and Cardiogenic Shock.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的种族、民族和性别差异。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 22;14(6):653-660. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.003.
8
Invasive Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的有创治疗:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2021 Apr 13;143(15):e815-e829. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000959. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
9
Cardiac safety research consortium "shock II" think tank report: Advancing practical approaches to generating evidence for the treatment of cardiogenic shock.心脏安全研究联盟“休克II”智库报告:推进为心源性休克治疗生成证据的实用方法。
Am Heart J. 2020 Dec;230:93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
10
Changes in Hospital Income, Use, and Quality Associated With Private Equity Acquisition.与私募股权投资收购相关的医院收入、使用和质量的变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Nov 1;180(11):1428-1435. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3552.