Malik Mushrin, Sequeira Gross Juan C, Francis-Morel Garry
Internal Medicine, St. Barnabas Hospital Health System, New York, USA.
Internal Medicine, Family Health Center of Southwest Florida, Fort Myers, USA.
Cureus. 2025 May 20;17(5):e84471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84471. eCollection 2025 May.
Background The healthcare landscape is notably divided between investor-owned and nonprofit hospitals, raising questions about the impact of hospital ownership on patient outcomes, especially for high-stakes conditions such as cardiogenic shock resulting from ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study analyzed whether differences in hospital ownership are associated with variations in mortality, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare costs. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2021, identifying 95,260 adult patients with STEMI-induced cardiogenic shock treated with PCI. Identification was based on validated International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding algorithms. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with LOS and total hospital charges (inflation-adjusted via the Consumer Price Index) as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were assessed using multivariable regression models adjusting for patient demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity), comorbidities, insurance type, and hospital-level factors (region, teaching status, and bed size). Regional cost variation and case mix were also accounted for. Propensity score matching was additionally performed to validate results. Results The analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality rates between investor-owned (27.22%) and nonprofit hospitals (26.93%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.03, p = 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.91-1.16). Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed similar findings (aOR = 0.98, p = 0.696). Investor-owned hospitals, however, incurred significantly higher healthcare costs (average charges = $325,543 vs. $222,528; p < 0.001). The average cost difference of $103,015.50 remained statistically and systemically significant after adjustment and may reflect differences in resource utilization and/or billing practices. LOS was slightly shorter in investor-owned hospitals (6.51 vs. 7.27 days); while statistically significant (p < 0.001), this difference was not clinically meaningful after adjustment (coefficient = 0.19, p = 0.334). Key demographic and clinical predictors included age, insurance status, comorbidity index, hospital bed size, and teaching status. Racial and insurance-based disparities, particularly among Hispanic patients and Medicaid enrollees, were associated with higher costs, though not fully explained by hospital ownership. Conclusions In this national analysis, hospital ownership was not associated with differences in mortality for STEMI-induced cardiogenic shock treated with PCI, but was independently associated with substantially higher hospital charges in investor-owned hospitals. These findings demonstrate association, not causation, and highlight the need for future research into cost drivers and initiatives to promote high-value, standardized care across all hospital types.
医疗保健领域显著地分为投资者所有的医院和非营利性医院,这引发了关于医院所有权对患者治疗结果影响的问题,尤其是对于诸如经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)所致心源性休克等高风险病症。本研究分析了医院所有权的差异是否与死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和医疗费用的变化相关。
我们使用2016年至2021年的全国住院患者样本(NIS)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,识别出95260例接受PCI治疗的STEMI诱发心源性休克的成年患者。识别基于经过验证的国际疾病分类第十版临床修订版编码算法。主要结局是院内死亡率,住院时间和总住院费用(通过消费者价格指数进行通胀调整)作为次要结局。所有结局均使用多变量回归模型进行评估,该模型对患者人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、种族/民族)、合并症、保险类型和医院层面因素(地区、教学状况和床位规模)进行了调整。还考虑了地区成本差异和病例组合。另外进行了倾向得分匹配以验证结果。
分析显示投资者所有的医院(27.22%)和非营利性医院(26.93%)之间的死亡率没有显著差异(调整后的优势比(aOR)=1.03,p=0.60;95%置信区间(CI)=0.91-1.16)。倾向得分匹配分析证实了类似的结果(aOR=0.98,p=0.696)。然而,投资者所有的医院产生的医疗费用显著更高(平均费用=325543美元对222528美元;p<0.001)。调整后103015.50美元的平均成本差异在统计学和系统层面上仍然显著,这可能反映了资源利用和/或计费实践的差异。投资者所有的医院的住院时间略短(6.51天对7.27天);虽然具有统计学显著性(p<0.001),但调整后这种差异在临床上并无意义(系数=0.19,p=0.334)。关键的人口统计学和临床预测因素包括年龄、保险状况、合并症指数、医院床位规模和教学状况。基于种族和保险的差异,特别是在西班牙裔患者和医疗补助参保者中,与更高的费用相关,尽管不能完全由医院所有权来解释。
在这项全国性分析中,医院所有权与接受PCI治疗的STEMI诱发心源性休克的死亡率差异无关,但与投资者所有的医院中显著更高的医院费用独立相关。这些发现表明存在关联而非因果关系,并强调未来需要对成本驱动因素以及促进所有类型医院提供高价值、标准化护理的举措进行研究。