Tanaka Tetsuji, Nagashima Fumiya
Department of Economics, Meiji Gakuin University, 1-2-37 Shirokanedai, Minato, 108-8636, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Economics, Kindai University, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashiosaka, 577-8502, Osaka, Japan.
J Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;390:126209. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126209. Epub 2025 Jun 21.
The European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) aims to prevent carbon leakage by imposing tariffs on imports of carbon-intensive products. While previous studies have analyzed CBAM's effects using computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, they have primarily focused on direct emissions or emissions related to electricity consumption. Few have comprehensively accounted for upstream indirect emissions or explored the potential economic impacts of retaliatory tariffs by affected countries. This study addresses these gaps by estimating the embodied carbon emissions associated with exports to the EU, including Scope 1, Scope 2, and indirect emissions excluding electricity, using a multi-regional input-output (MRIO) framework based on the GTAP database. A global CGE model is then employed to simulate the economic impacts of CBAM under various carbon price scenarios and to assess the effects of possible retaliatory tariffs by China. The results reveal that while CBAM effectively reduces carbon leakage, it imposes substantial economic burdens on exporting countries, particularly when indirect emissions are fully considered. Retaliatory tariffs by China further exacerbate these economic impacts, highlighting the risk of trade conflicts. These findings suggest that policymakers should design CBAM in a manner that accounts for embodied emissions while also considering cooperative mechanisms to mitigate potential trade tensions and ensure a fair and effective global climate policy framework.
欧盟的碳边境调节机制(CBAM)旨在通过对碳密集型产品的进口征收关税来防止碳泄漏。虽然此前的研究使用可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型分析了CBAM的影响,但它们主要关注直接排放或与电力消费相关的排放。很少有研究全面考虑上游间接排放,或探讨受影响国家报复性关税的潜在经济影响。本研究通过使用基于全球贸易分析项目(GTAP)数据库的多区域投入产出(MRIO)框架,估算与对欧盟出口相关的隐含碳排放,包括范围一排放、范围二排放以及不包括电力的间接排放,来填补这些空白。然后采用全球CGE模型来模拟CBAM在各种碳价格情景下的经济影响,并评估中国可能实施的报复性关税的影响。结果显示,虽然CBAM有效地减少了碳泄漏,但它给出口国带来了巨大的经济负担,尤其是在充分考虑间接排放的情况下。中国的报复性关税进一步加剧了这些经济影响,凸显了贸易冲突的风险。这些研究结果表明,政策制定者在设计CBAM时应考虑隐含排放,同时还要考虑合作机制,以缓解潜在的贸易紧张关系,并确保建立一个公平有效的全球气候政策框架。