Suppr超能文献

当代研究中的细胞宏观包裹装置:一项系统综述。

Cell macroencapsulation devices in contemporary research: A systematic review.

作者信息

Bernardi Murillo D L, Rus Natascha, Vernooij Robin W M, Verhaar Marianne C, Rookmaaker Maarten B

机构信息

University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Nephrology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Independent Researcher, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Regen Ther. 2025 Jun 9;30:144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2025.05.013. eCollection 2025 Dec.

Abstract

Cell macroencapsulation devices (CMDs) represent a promising therapeutic approach by combining controlled, off-the-shelf technology with living tissue functionality. Despite their potential, the current knowledge about CMD development and implementation remains fragmented across different applications. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize the available evidence on implantable CMDs and establish a comprehensive framework for their development. Our analysis cataloged studies based on device materials and design, cell types, implantation strategies, and evaluation methods. The review revealed that CMD development has largely progressed in application-specific silos, with varying approaches to device characterization, cell selection (from xenogeneic to autologous), and assessment methods. Key evaluation parameters included cell survival and functionality, host tissue response (inflammation, vascularization, and fibrosis), and therapeutic efficacy. While successful implementations exist across multiple applications, the lack of standardized development and evaluation protocols emerges as a significant barrier to cross-application advancement. These findings highlight the need for unified assessment frameworks to accelerate CMD development across therapeutic applications.

摘要

细胞宏观封装装置(CMD)通过将可控的现成技术与活组织功能相结合,代表了一种很有前景的治疗方法。尽管它们具有潜力,但目前关于CMD开发和应用的知识在不同应用中仍然零散。我们进行了一项系统综述,以综合关于可植入CMD的现有证据,并为其开发建立一个全面的框架。我们的分析根据装置材料和设计、细胞类型、植入策略以及评估方法对研究进行了分类。该综述表明,CMD的开发在很大程度上是在特定应用的孤立环境中进行的,在装置表征、细胞选择(从异种到自体)和评估方法上有不同的方法。关键评估参数包括细胞存活和功能、宿主组织反应(炎症、血管生成和纤维化)以及治疗效果。虽然在多个应用中都有成功的实例,但缺乏标准化的开发和评估方案成为跨应用推进的重大障碍。这些发现凸显了统一评估框架对于加速跨治疗应用的CMD开发的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c59/12180967/8461db475039/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验