Ross Kathryn M, Arroyo Kelsey M, McVay Megan A
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Advocate Health, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Jun 7;46:101505. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101505. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Little is known regarding information seeking by participants in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of behavioral interventions. The current study explored the prevalence of information seeking, whether information seeking varied by participant demographic characteristics, and whether information seeking affected participants' study knowledge or trial-related behavior.
Adults who were currently or recently enrolled in a behavioral RCT completed an online survey. Respondents were asked retrospectively about their trial participation history, information seeking behavior before and after trial enrollment, and how any information found impacted their trial experience.
Respondents (N = 92) predominantly identified as women (70.7 %) and White (62.0 %), had an average (mean ± SD) age of 45.1 ± 12.4 years, and were enrolled in trials with a range of foci, from weight loss (38 %) to smoking cessation (31.5 %) and mental health (22.8 %). Overall, 37 % searched for trial information at least once, with 28.3 % searching before enrollment and 17.4 % after enrollment, most commonly via internet search engines. Participants searched for details regarding trial length, study conditions, expected findings, and compensation. Searching for information was not associated with experience during trial consent. Searching prior to enrollment generally increased likelihood of enrollment, whereas searching after enrollment was reported to have limited to no effect on trial behavior.
A sizable minority of trial participants search for trial information from outside sources, which may support increased enrollment. Investigators should consider how information shared online (e.g., via protocol papers or ClinicalTrials.gov) describes study hypotheses and intervention techniques to avoid potential bias due to participant demand characteristics or intervention diffusion.
关于行为干预随机临床试验(RCT)参与者的信息寻求情况,我们了解得很少。本研究探讨了信息寻求的普遍性、信息寻求是否因参与者的人口统计学特征而异,以及信息寻求是否会影响参与者的研究知识或与试验相关的行为。
目前或最近参加行为RCT的成年人完成了一项在线调查。受访者被回顾性地询问他们的试验参与历史、试验入组前后的信息寻求行为,以及所发现的任何信息如何影响他们的试验体验。
受访者(N = 92)主要为女性(70.7%)和白人(62.0%),平均年龄为45.1±12.4岁,参与了一系列不同重点的试验,从减肥(38%)到戒烟(31.5%)和心理健康(22.8%)。总体而言,37%的人至少搜索过一次试验信息,其中28.3%在入组前搜索,17.4%在入组后搜索,最常见的方式是通过互联网搜索引擎。参与者搜索了关于试验时长、研究条件、预期结果和补偿的详细信息。在试验同意过程中,搜索信息与体验无关。入组前搜索通常会增加入组的可能性,而据报道入组后搜索对试验行为的影响有限或没有影响。
相当一部分试验参与者会从外部来源搜索试验信息,这可能有助于增加入组人数。研究人员应考虑在线共享的信息(例如通过方案文件或ClinicalTrials.gov)如何描述研究假设和干预技术,以避免因参与者需求特征或干预扩散导致的潜在偏差。