Suppr超能文献

试验需要参与者,但不需要他们的反馈?对已发表的关于测量临床试验参与者体验的文献进行的范围综述。

Trials need participants but not their feedback? A scoping review of published papers on the measurement of participant experience of taking part in clinical trials.

机构信息

NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, 5th Floor Williamson Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Block F Waterhouse Building, University of Liverpool, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2019 Jun 24;20(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3444-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participant recruitment and retention are long-standing problems in clinical trials. Although there are a large number of factors impacting on recruitment and retention, some of the problems may reflect the fact that trial design and delivery is not sufficiently 'patient-centred' (i.e., sensitive to patient needs and preferences). Most trials collect process and outcome measures, but it is unclear whether patient experience of trial participation itself is routinely measured. We conducted a structured scoping review of studies reporting standardised assessment of patient experience of participation in a trial.

METHODS

A structured search of Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and hand searching of included studies were conducted in 2016. Additional sources included policy documents, relevant websites and experts. We extracted data on trial context (type, date and location) and measure type (number of items and mode of administration), patient experience domains measured, and the results reported. We conducted a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

We identified 22 journal articles reporting on 21 different structured measures of participant experience in trials. None of the studies used a formal definition of patient experience. Overall, patients reported relatively high levels of global satisfaction with the trial process as well as positive outcomes (such as the likelihood of future participation or recommendation of the trial to others).

CONCLUSIONS

Current published evidence is sparse. Standardised assessment of patient experience of trial participation may provide opportunities for researchers to enhance trial design and delivery. This could complement other methods of enhancing the patient-centredness of trials and might improve recruitment, retention, and long-term patient engagement with trials.

摘要

背景

参与者招募和保留是临床试验中长期存在的问题。尽管有许多因素会影响招募和保留,但其中一些问题可能反映出试验设计和实施不够“以患者为中心”(即对患者的需求和偏好敏感)。大多数试验都收集过程和结果指标,但尚不清楚是否常规测量患者对参与试验的体验。我们对报告标准化评估患者参与试验体验的研究进行了结构的范围审查。

方法

我们于 2016 年在 Medline、PsycINFO、Embase 和 CINAHL(护理和联合健康文献累积索引)中进行了结构化搜索,并对纳入的研究进行了手工搜索。其他来源包括政策文件、相关网站和专家。我们提取了关于试验背景(类型、日期和地点)和测量类型(项目数量和管理模式)、测量的患者体验领域以及报告的结果的数据。我们进行了叙述性综合。

结果

我们确定了 22 篇报道了 21 种不同的参与者在试验中体验的结构化测量的期刊文章。没有一项研究使用了患者体验的正式定义。总体而言,患者对试验过程以及积极结果(如未来参与的可能性或向他人推荐试验)的整体满意度相对较高。

结论

目前发表的证据很少。标准化评估患者参与试验的体验可能为研究人员提供机会,以增强试验设计和实施。这可以补充其他增强试验以患者为中心的方法,并可能改善招募、保留和患者长期参与试验的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验