• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Which Aspects Do Men Value Most? An Interview Study With Men Invited to a Population-Based Program.前列腺癌筛查决策:男性最看重哪些方面?一项针对受邀参加基于人群项目的男性的访谈研究。
Am J Mens Health. 2025 May-Jun;19(3):15579883251344563. doi: 10.1177/15579883251344563. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
6
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
10
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for prostate cancer: evidence, ongoing trials, policies and knowledge gaps.前列腺癌筛查:证据、正在进行的试验、政策及知识空白。
BMJ Oncol. 2023 Apr 20;2(1):e000039. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000039. eCollection 2023.
2
Men's Perception of Being Invited for Prostate Cancer Testing and the Information About Its Pros and Cons-A Survey from Two Population-based Testing Programmes.男性对受邀进行前列腺癌检测及其利弊信息的认知——来自两项基于人群的检测项目的调查
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 May 2;52:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.012. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
The impact of influences in a medical screening programme invitation: a randomized controlled trial.医学筛查项目邀请中影响因素的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Jun 1;33(3):509-514. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad067.
4
The Impact of Receipt of Information on Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing on Screening with the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test.接受信息对前列腺特异性抗原检测用于前列腺特异性抗原检测筛查的影响。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1313-1321. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02264-1. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
5
Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA and MRI Followed by Targeted Biopsy Only.仅用 PSA 和 MRI 进行前列腺癌筛查,然后进行靶向活检。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 8;387(23):2126-2137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2209454.
6
Designing and Implementing a Population-based Organised Prostate Cancer Testing Programme.设计并实施一项基于人群的有组织的前列腺癌检测计划。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1568-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
7
The GÖTEBORG prostate cancer screening 2 trial: a prospective, randomised, population-based prostate cancer screening trial with prostate-specific antigen testing followed by magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.哥德堡前列腺癌筛查 2 试验:一项前瞻性、随机、基于人群的前列腺癌筛查试验,采用前列腺特异性抗原检测,随后进行前列腺磁共振成像。
Scand J Urol. 2021 Apr;55(2):116-124. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1881612. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
How to … assess the quality of qualitative research.如何……评估定性研究的质量。
Clin Teach. 2020 Dec;17(6):596-599. doi: 10.1111/tct.13242. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程中的抽象和解释。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Aug;108:103632. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Autonomous and informed decision-making: The case of colorectal cancer screening.自主和知情决策:以结直肠癌筛查为例。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233308. eCollection 2020.

前列腺癌筛查决策:男性最看重哪些方面?一项针对受邀参加基于人群项目的男性的访谈研究。

Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Which Aspects Do Men Value Most? An Interview Study With Men Invited to a Population-Based Program.

作者信息

Svensson Linda, Bratt Ola, Hugosson Jonas, Stinesen Karin

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Am J Mens Health. 2025 May-Jun;19(3):15579883251344563. doi: 10.1177/15579883251344563. Epub 2025 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1177/15579883251344563
PMID:40548674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12185938/
Abstract

This study explores aspects that men consider when deciding whether to participate in a prostate cancer screening program and how the information in the invitation letter contributed to their decision. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 50- to 62-year-old men invited by letter to a population-based prostate cancer screening program. Data from transcribed interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis using manifest and indicative approaches. Eighteen men were interviewed, 10 whom chose to be tested, and 8 who declined screening. The information in the invitation letter was not decisive for whether men chose to be tested or not. The aspects that the men valued in their personal decision to participate or refrain from screening were categorized as (a) the expectation that authorities should take responsibility and provide guidance; (b) fear, which was described as both a driving force and a barrier; (c) reliance upon intuition combined with seeking social and emotional support; (d) the perception of one's own risk of being affected. Men who relied on risk assessment mentioned difficulties in evaluating the information about the potential disadvantages of screening. Our findings suggest that the intention of informed decision-making for prostate cancer screening is difficult to fully realize. Further research is needed to understand how the individual decision-making process is influenced by factors such as assessment of personal risk, perception of advantages and disadvantages, and cultural background, and to optimize the information to the invited men.

摘要

本研究探讨了男性在决定是否参与前列腺癌筛查项目时所考虑的因素,以及邀请信中的信息如何影响他们的决定。对50至62岁、收到信件邀请参加基于人群的前列腺癌筛查项目的男性进行了半结构化访谈。使用显性和指示性方法对访谈转录数据进行定性内容分析。共访谈了18名男性,其中10人选择接受检测,8人拒绝筛查。邀请信中的信息对于男性是否选择接受检测并非决定性因素。男性在个人决定参与或不参与筛查时所重视的因素可分为:(a)期望当局承担责任并提供指导;(b)恐惧,其被描述为既是驱动力又是障碍;(c)依靠直觉并寻求社会和情感支持;(d)对自身受影响风险的认知。依赖风险评估的男性提到在评估筛查潜在弊端信息方面存在困难。我们的研究结果表明,前列腺癌筛查知情决策的意图难以完全实现。需要进一步研究以了解个人决策过程如何受到个人风险评估、利弊认知和文化背景等因素的影响,并优化向受邀男性提供的信息。