Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌筛查决策:男性最看重哪些方面?一项针对受邀参加基于人群项目的男性的访谈研究。

Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Which Aspects Do Men Value Most? An Interview Study With Men Invited to a Population-Based Program.

作者信息

Svensson Linda, Bratt Ola, Hugosson Jonas, Stinesen Karin

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Am J Mens Health. 2025 May-Jun;19(3):15579883251344563. doi: 10.1177/15579883251344563. Epub 2025 Jun 23.

Abstract

This study explores aspects that men consider when deciding whether to participate in a prostate cancer screening program and how the information in the invitation letter contributed to their decision. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 50- to 62-year-old men invited by letter to a population-based prostate cancer screening program. Data from transcribed interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis using manifest and indicative approaches. Eighteen men were interviewed, 10 whom chose to be tested, and 8 who declined screening. The information in the invitation letter was not decisive for whether men chose to be tested or not. The aspects that the men valued in their personal decision to participate or refrain from screening were categorized as (a) the expectation that authorities should take responsibility and provide guidance; (b) fear, which was described as both a driving force and a barrier; (c) reliance upon intuition combined with seeking social and emotional support; (d) the perception of one's own risk of being affected. Men who relied on risk assessment mentioned difficulties in evaluating the information about the potential disadvantages of screening. Our findings suggest that the intention of informed decision-making for prostate cancer screening is difficult to fully realize. Further research is needed to understand how the individual decision-making process is influenced by factors such as assessment of personal risk, perception of advantages and disadvantages, and cultural background, and to optimize the information to the invited men.

摘要

本研究探讨了男性在决定是否参与前列腺癌筛查项目时所考虑的因素,以及邀请信中的信息如何影响他们的决定。对50至62岁、收到信件邀请参加基于人群的前列腺癌筛查项目的男性进行了半结构化访谈。使用显性和指示性方法对访谈转录数据进行定性内容分析。共访谈了18名男性,其中10人选择接受检测,8人拒绝筛查。邀请信中的信息对于男性是否选择接受检测并非决定性因素。男性在个人决定参与或不参与筛查时所重视的因素可分为:(a)期望当局承担责任并提供指导;(b)恐惧,其被描述为既是驱动力又是障碍;(c)依靠直觉并寻求社会和情感支持;(d)对自身受影响风险的认知。依赖风险评估的男性提到在评估筛查潜在弊端信息方面存在困难。我们的研究结果表明,前列腺癌筛查知情决策的意图难以完全实现。需要进一步研究以了解个人决策过程如何受到个人风险评估、利弊认知和文化背景等因素的影响,并优化向受邀男性提供的信息。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
How to … assess the quality of qualitative research.如何……评估定性研究的质量。
Clin Teach. 2020 Dec;17(6):596-599. doi: 10.1111/tct.13242. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程中的抽象和解释。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Aug;108:103632. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Autonomous and informed decision-making: The case of colorectal cancer screening.自主和知情决策:以结直肠癌筛查为例。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233308. eCollection 2020.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验