Lerín-Calvo Alfredo, Fernández-Pérez Juan José, Ferrer-Peña Raúl, Martín-Odriozola Aitor
Grupo de Investigación en Neurociencias Aplicadas a la Rehabilitación (GINARE), 28923 Alcorcón, Spain.
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, 28023 Madrid, Spain.
Neurol Int. 2025 Jun 9;17(6):89. doi: 10.3390/neurolint17060089.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) are established interventions to enhance upper limb motor function (ULMF) in people with stroke (PwS). However, evidence supporting their combined use remains limited and inconsistent. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combined tDCS and FES for improving ULMF, activity, and participation in PwS.
A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from inception to December 2024. Randomized and controlled clinical trials (RCTs) involving adults (≥18 years) with acute, subacute, or chronic stroke undergoing combined tDCS and FES interventions were included. Methodological quality was assessed with the PEDro scale, and risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. A qualitative synthesis was performed employing a five-level evidence grading system.
Five RCTs involving 148 participants (mean age range: 50.6-61.2 years; 26% female) were included. Stroke chronicity ranged from 7.6 days to 27.5 months post-onset. Four studies reported significant ULMF improvements with the combined intervention. However, activity and participation outcomes were inconsistently assessed, and results remained inconclusive. Methodological quality varied, with one study rated as excellent, two as good, one as fair, and one as poor. The risk of bias was rated high or with concerns in four out of five studies.
Based on qualitative synthesis, moderate-level evidence supports the combined use of tDCS and FES for improving ULMF in PwS. However, high variability in protocols, small sample sizes, and the increased risk of bias in most studies limit the strength of these conclusions. Standardized protocols and larger high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this combined intervention.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和功能性电刺激(FES)是用于增强中风患者(PwS)上肢运动功能(ULMF)的既定干预措施。然而,支持其联合使用的证据仍然有限且不一致。本系统评价旨在评估tDCS与FES联合使用对改善PwS的ULMF、活动能力和参与度的有效性。
从创刊至2024年12月,在MEDLINE、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus、CENTRAL、SCOPUS和Web of Science数据库中进行了系统检索。纳入了涉及急性、亚急性或慢性中风的成人(≥18岁)接受tDCS与FES联合干预的随机对照临床试验(RCT)。采用PEDro量表评估方法学质量,并使用Cochrane RoB2工具评估偏倚风险。采用五级证据分级系统进行定性综合分析。
纳入了5项RCT,共148名参与者(平均年龄范围:50.6 - 61.2岁;26%为女性)。中风病程为发病后7.6天至27.5个月。四项研究报告联合干预后ULMF有显著改善。然而,活动能力和参与度的结果评估不一致,结果仍无定论。方法学质量各不相同,一项研究评为优秀,两项评为良好,一项评为中等,一项评为差。五项研究中有四项的偏倚风险被评为高或存在担忧。
基于定性综合分析,中等水平的证据支持tDCS与FES联合使用可改善PwS的ULMF。然而,方案的高变异性、小样本量以及大多数研究中增加的偏倚风险限制了这些结论的力度。需要标准化方案和更大规模的高质量RCT来证实这种联合干预的有效性。