Leggett Emmeline, Haan Shirin, Mendoza Carolina, Pourmand Ali, Sommerkamp Sarah, Chasm Rose, Adler Jason, Bond Michael C, Tran Quincy K
School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 18;14(12):4333. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124333.
Visits to Emergency Departments (ED) in the United States are increasing, creating a crowding problem, including longer length of stay in the ED (EDLOS) and worse outcomes. Many ED resort to observational units (EDOU) to help alleviate this crowding issue. This narrative review assessed the current state of literature to investigate the benefits of EDOU while reviewing the barriers to create such units. : This review utilized the Patient Intervention Control Outcome (PICO) format. The searches were performed on PubMed from its inception to 14 November 2024. The outcomes were EDLOS, hospital admission rates, and 7-day ED return rates. Any randomized trials or observational studies (either retrospective or prospective) that reported pre-EDOUs and post-EDOUs, or studies comparing patients in the EDOUs versus control were eligible. We excluded abstracts and non-original studies. : Our search identified 904 results, and we included 34 articles in this review. Four studies reported EDLOS with an average of 14-23 h. Two studies performed a comparison analysis and found a decreases in EDLOS between 23 and 28%, while two studies discovered no significant difference. Four studies reported a statistically significant reduction in hospital admission rates, with absolute reductions in rates ranging from 2.7% to 44%. Two studies found no significant difference. Both EDLOS and rates of hospital admission were more impactful when EDOU focused on a single chief complaint or narrowed criteria. Only three studies commented on 7-day ED return rate, reporting ranges from 1.9% of patients returning in 72 h, and 10.8% returning within 14 days. Additionally, they identified that 53.3% of potentially avoidable visits occurred within 48 h of discharge, and the majority of returns were related to original chief complaints. : The Observation Units for Emergency Departments offer many benefits such as potential reduction in EDLOS and hospital admissions. However, the implementation of EDOUs usually comes with high initial costs, which hinders the process. Thus, more studies with robust methodology are still needed to assess the intricacies of these benefits of the EDOUs.
美国急诊科的就诊人数不断增加,引发了拥挤问题,包括急诊留观时间延长以及更糟糕的治疗结果。许多急诊科求助于观察单元(EDOU)来帮助缓解这一拥挤问题。本叙述性综述评估了当前的文献状况,以研究急诊观察单元的益处,同时审视设立此类单元的障碍。:本综述采用了患者-干预-对照-结局(PICO)格式。检索范围为从PubMed数据库建立至2024年11月14日。结局指标为急诊留观时间、住院率和7天内急诊复诊率。任何报告了设立急诊观察单元前后情况的随机试验或观察性研究(回顾性或前瞻性),或比较急诊观察单元患者与对照组患者的研究均符合要求。我们排除了摘要和非原创性研究。:我们的检索共得到904条结果,本综述纳入了34篇文章。四项研究报告了急诊留观时间,平均为14至23小时。两项研究进行了对比分析,发现急诊留观时间减少了23%至28%,而两项研究未发现显著差异。四项研究报告住院率有统计学意义的降低,绝对降低率在2.7%至44%之间。两项研究未发现显著差异。当急诊观察单元专注于单一主要诉求或更严格的标准时,急诊留观时间和住院率受到的影响更大。只有三项研究对7天内急诊复诊率进行了评论,报告称72小时内复诊的患者比例为1.9%,14天内复诊的患者比例为10.8%。此外,他们发现53.3%的潜在可避免就诊发生在出院后48小时内,且大多数复诊与最初的主要诉求有关。:急诊科观察单元有诸多益处,如可能缩短急诊留观时间和降低住院率。然而,急诊观察单元的设立通常初始成本高昂,这阻碍了该过程。因此,仍需要更多采用严谨方法的研究来评估急诊观察单元这些益处的复杂性。