Nishii Yasufumi, Sakuma Kenji, Hamanaka Shun, Iwata Nakao, Kishi Taro
Department of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2025 Sep;45(3):e70034. doi: 10.1002/npr2.70034.
Whether histamine H3 receptor antagonists (H3R-ANTs)/inverse agonists (H3R-IAs) provides benefit for the treatment of schizophrenia remains unclear. This meta-analysis was conducted to address the above clinical question.
Cognitive Function Scale's composite score (primary), seven domains of cognitive function (speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning/problem solving, and social cognition) score, University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment score, psychopathology scales score, discontinuation rate, and incidence of individual adverse events were among the study outcomes. The standardized mean differences (SMD) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Our meta-analysis included 11 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (n = 754). Our study evaluated ABT-288, betahistine, betahistine+reboxetine, GSK239512, MK-0249, and pitolisant. Betahistine has an H1-receptor agonistic reaction and H3-receptor antagonistic reaction, while other drugs only have an H3-receptor antagonistic/inverse agonistic reaction. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis for all outcomes divided by betahistine or other pooled H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs. The study results show that betahistine outperformed placebo in the improvement of overall cognitive symptoms (SMD [95% CI] = -0.61 [-1.03, -0.18]), speed of processing (-0.44 [-0.87, -0.02]), attention/vigilance (-0.43 [-0.85, -0.01]), working memory (-0.48 [-0.90, -0.06]), verbal learning (-0.62 [-1.04, -0.19]), visual learning (-0.57 [-1.00, -0.15]), and betahistine+reboxetine was superior in the improvement of depressive symptoms (-4.04 [-5.10, -2.97]). Pitolisant outperformed placebo in depressive symptom improvement (-3.24 [-4.22, -2.26]). However, the results were derived from one betahistine, betahistine+reboxetine, or pitolisant study. Other pooled H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs revealed risk of insomnia (RR [95% CI] = 2.18 [1.05, 4.55]). However, no differences were observed in other any outcomes between betahistine or other pooled H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs and placebo.
Some H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs might provide benefit for the treatment of cognitive symptoms and depressive symptoms in individuals afflicted with schizophrenia.
组胺H3受体拮抗剂(H3R-ANTs)/反向激动剂(H3R-IAs)对精神分裂症治疗是否有益尚不清楚。进行此项荟萃分析以解决上述临床问题。
研究结果包括认知功能量表综合评分(主要指标)、认知功能的七个领域(处理速度、注意力/警觉性、工作记忆、言语学习、视觉学习、推理/解决问题和社会认知)评分、加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校基于表现的技能评估评分、精神病理学量表评分、停药率及个体不良事件发生率。计算标准化均数差(SMD)或风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)。
我们的荟萃分析纳入了11项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验(n = 754)。我们的研究评估了ABT-288、倍他司汀、倍他司汀+瑞波西汀、GSK239512、MK-0249和匹托品生。倍他司汀具有H1受体激动反应和H3受体拮抗反应,而其他药物仅具有H3受体拮抗/反向激动反应。因此,我们对所有结果按倍他司汀或其他合并的H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs进行了荟萃分析。研究结果表明,倍他司汀在改善总体认知症状(SMD [95% CI] = -0.61 [-1.03, -0.18])、处理速度(-0.44 [-0.87, -0.02])、注意力/警觉性(-0.43 [-0.85, -0.01])、工作记忆(-0.48 [-0.9, -], -])、言语学习(-0.62 [-1.04, -0.19])、视觉学习(-0.57 [-1.00, -0.1])方面优于安慰剂,且倍他司汀+瑞波西汀在改善抑郁症状方面更具优势(-4.04 [-5.10, -2.97])。匹托品生在改善抑郁症状方面优于安慰剂(-3.24 [-4.22, -2.26])。然而,这些结果来自一项倍他司汀、倍他司汀+瑞波西汀或匹托品生的研究。其他合并的H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs显示存在失眠风险(RR [95% CI] = 2.18 [1.05, 4.55])。然而,在倍他司汀或其他合并的H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs与安慰剂之间的其他任何结果中未观察到差异。
一些H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs可能对精神分裂症患者的认知症状和抑郁症状治疗有益。