• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于物联网(IoT)设备识别的机器学习:一项比较研究。

Machine learning for Internet of Things (IoT) device identification: a comparative study.

作者信息

Tahaei Hamid, Liu Anqi, Forooghikian Hamid, Gheisari Mehdi, Zaki Faiz, Anuar Nor Badrul, Fang Zhaoxi, Huang Longjun

机构信息

Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.

School of Computing and Data Science, Xiamen University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 May 8;11:e2873. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2873. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.2873
PMID:40567747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12192943/
Abstract

The rapid deployment of millions of connected devices brings significant security challenges to the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT devices are typically resource-constrained and designed for specific tasks, from which new security challenges are introduced. As such, IoT device identification has garnered substantial attention and is regarded as an initial layer of cybersecurity. One of the major steps in distinguishing IoT devices involves leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques on device network flows known as device fingerprinting. Numerous studies have proposed various solutions that incorporate ML and feature selection (FS) algorithms with different degrees of accuracy. Yet, the domain needs a comparative analysis of the accuracy of different classifiers and FS algorithms to comprehend their true capabilities in various datasets. This article provides a comprehensive performance evaluation of several reputable classifiers being used in the literature. The study evaluates the efficacy of filter-and wrapper-based FS methods across various ML classifiers. Additionally, we implemented a Binary Green Wolf Optimizer (BGWO) and compared its performance with that of traditional ML classifiers to assess the potential of this binary meta-heuristic algorithm. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we evaluated the effectiveness of each classifier and FS method using two widely utilized datasets. Our experiments demonstrated that BGWO effectively reduced the feature set by 85.11% and 73.33% for datasets 1 and 2, respectively, while achieving classification accuracies of 98.51% and 99.8%, respectively. The findings of this study highlight the strong capabilities of BGWO in reducing both the feature dimensionality and accuracy gained through classification. Furthermore, it demonstrates the effectiveness of wrapper methods in the reduction of feature sets.

摘要

数百万联网设备的快速部署给物联网(IoT)带来了重大的安全挑战。物联网设备通常资源受限且专为特定任务设计,由此引入了新的安全挑战。因此,物联网设备识别受到了广泛关注,并被视为网络安全的初始层面。区分物联网设备的主要步骤之一是在称为设备指纹识别的设备网络流上利用机器学习(ML)技术。众多研究提出了各种结合ML和特征选择(FS)算法的解决方案,其准确率各不相同。然而,该领域需要对不同分类器和FS算法的准确率进行比较分析,以了解它们在各种数据集中的真实能力。本文对文献中使用的几种著名分类器进行了全面的性能评估。该研究评估了基于过滤和包装的FS方法在各种ML分类器中的有效性。此外,我们实现了一种二进制灰狼优化器(BGWO),并将其性能与传统ML分类器的性能进行比较,以评估这种二进制元启发式算法的潜力。为确保我们研究结果的稳健性,我们使用两个广泛使用的数据集评估了每个分类器和FS方法的有效性。我们的实验表明,对于数据集1和数据集2,BGWO分别有效地将特征集减少了85.11%和73.33%,同时分类准确率分别达到了98.51%和99.8%。本研究结果突出了BGWO在降低特征维度和提高分类准确率方面的强大能力。此外,它还证明了包装方法在减少特征集方面的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/a5055cb5b480/peerj-cs-11-2873-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/0dabc3d34d5b/peerj-cs-11-2873-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/666f64f88560/peerj-cs-11-2873-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/512f7d2edb73/peerj-cs-11-2873-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/62a2fb533ce4/peerj-cs-11-2873-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/3060662f33b8/peerj-cs-11-2873-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/080e176a9242/peerj-cs-11-2873-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/a9dcc7200ff5/peerj-cs-11-2873-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/6036a6711421/peerj-cs-11-2873-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/043de2249fcd/peerj-cs-11-2873-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/57e14a3fe356/peerj-cs-11-2873-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/a5055cb5b480/peerj-cs-11-2873-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/0dabc3d34d5b/peerj-cs-11-2873-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/666f64f88560/peerj-cs-11-2873-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/512f7d2edb73/peerj-cs-11-2873-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/62a2fb533ce4/peerj-cs-11-2873-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/3060662f33b8/peerj-cs-11-2873-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/080e176a9242/peerj-cs-11-2873-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/a9dcc7200ff5/peerj-cs-11-2873-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/6036a6711421/peerj-cs-11-2873-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/043de2249fcd/peerj-cs-11-2873-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/57e14a3fe356/peerj-cs-11-2873-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e26/12192943/a5055cb5b480/peerj-cs-11-2873-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning for Internet of Things (IoT) device identification: a comparative study.用于物联网(IoT)设备识别的机器学习:一项比较研究。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 May 8;11:e2873. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2873. eCollection 2025.
2
Stabilizing machine learning for reproducible and explainable results: A novel validation approach to subject-specific insights.稳定机器学习以获得可重复和可解释的结果:一种针对特定个体见解的新型验证方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025 Jun 21;269:108899. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108899.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
6
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated IoT Device Identification Based on Full Packet Information Using Real-Time Network Traffic.基于实时网络流量全数据包信息的自动化物联网设备识别
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 10;21(8):2660. doi: 10.3390/s21082660.