Piedra Lissette M, Iveniuk James
School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA.
National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Innov Aging. 2025 Mar 9;9(6):igaf025. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaf025. eCollection 2025.
This study explores how social networks among older adults evolve over time and their impact on self-rated health (SRH), emphasizing differences across ethnoracial and linguistic groups. Though the link between social networks and well-being is well-known, how these networks change and affect health remains less understood.
The study examined changes in social network types across 3 rounds of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. The initial sample included 3 005 individuals, which decreased to 1 592 by the final follow-up. We analyzed data from participants in every round, totaling 6 858 observations, using Random-Intercept Latent Transition Analysis. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to predict network membership and transitions and to assess correlations with SRH.
We identified 3 distinct social network types: "Enriched," "Focused," and "Restricted." "Enriched" networks feature broad connections, high marriage rates, active engagement, and low loneliness. "Focused" networks involve small, close-knit groups with frequent interactions, moderate marriage rates, and low loneliness. "Restricted" networks are family-oriented, with low marriage rates and the highest loneliness levels. Over time, "Restricted" networks became more prevalent, whereas "Focus" networks showed the most mobility. Network type membership varied significantly by ethnoracial identity and gender, with Black, Hispanic, and female respondents less likely to belong to "Enriched" networks. Membership in "Enriched" networks was linked to better SRH scores.
The growth of "Restricted" networks over time raises concerns about older adults becoming confined to limited social environments. However, there is a silver lining: within the "Focused" group, more individuals transition to "Enriched" networks than to "Restricted" ones, indicating that older adults can expand their social connections as they age. Understanding the factors driving this shift can guide interventions to promote network expansion for vulnerable groups, enhancing social well-being, and mitigating the risks associated with restricted networks.
本研究探讨老年人的社交网络如何随时间演变及其对自评健康(SRH)的影响,着重关注不同种族和语言群体之间的差异。尽管社交网络与幸福感之间的联系广为人知,但这些网络如何变化以及如何影响健康仍鲜为人知。
该研究考察了三轮全国社会生活、健康与老龄化项目中社交网络类型的变化。初始样本包括3005人,到最终随访时减少至1592人。我们使用随机截距潜在转变分析,对每一轮参与者的数据进行分析,共计6858次观察。进行多项逻辑回归以预测网络成员身份和转变,并评估与自评健康的相关性。
我们识别出三种不同的社交网络类型:“丰富型”、“集中型”和“受限型”。“丰富型”网络具有广泛的联系、高结婚率、积极的参与度和低孤独感。“集中型”网络由小型、紧密的群体组成,互动频繁,结婚率适中,孤独感较低。“受限型”网络以家庭为导向,结婚率低,孤独感最强。随着时间的推移,“受限型”网络变得更加普遍,而“集中型”网络的流动性最大。网络类型成员身份因种族身份和性别而有显著差异,黑人、西班牙裔和女性受访者属于“丰富型”网络的可能性较小。“丰富型”网络的成员身份与更好的自评健康得分相关。
随着时间的推移,“受限型”网络的增长引发了对老年人被局限于有限社会环境的担忧。然而,也有一线希望:在“集中型”群体中,更多个体转向“丰富型”网络而非“受限型”网络,这表明老年人在变老过程中可以扩大他们的社会联系。了解推动这种转变的因素可以指导干预措施,以促进弱势群体的网络扩展,增强社会幸福感,并降低与受限网络相关的风险。