Dunn Jennifer
College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Nurs Inq. 2025 Jul;32(3):e70043. doi: 10.1111/nin.70043.
This discussion paper critically examines how power, policy, and autonomy intersect within perioperative nursing practice. In surgical environments engineered for precision and control, perioperative nurses operate in spaces that simultaneously depend on their expertise and suppress their professional voice. Drawing on feminist theory, relational ethics, and organizational sociology, this paper interrogates the structural, spatial, and symbolic forces that subordinate perioperative nursing. Hospital design, procedural norms, and entrenched hierarchies are shown to reinforce the containment of nursing authority. Power dynamics manifest through gendered labor expectations, professional gatekeeping, and policy constraints, all of which limit nurses' capacity for advocacy, leadership, and autonomous decision-making. Issues such as moral distress, workplace aggression, and educational marginalization are reframed as systemic, rather than individual challenges-embedded within a broader architecture of exclusion. Through comparative analysis and reform models, the discussion re-articulates perioperative autonomy as a strategic reclamation of professional agency, grounded in interdisciplinary respect and structural inclusion. Ultimately, this paper argues that authentic transformation in surgical settings requires a cultural shift: one that repositions perioperative nurses not as assistants to innovation, but as architects of surgical care and co-authors of policy and practice.
本讨论文件批判性地审视了权力、政策和自主权在围手术期护理实践中的相互关系。在为精准和控制而设计的手术环境中,围手术期护士在既依赖其专业知识又压制其专业话语权的空间中工作。本文借鉴女性主义理论、关系伦理学和组织社会学,审视了使围手术期护理处于从属地位的结构、空间和象征力量。医院设计、程序规范和根深蒂固的等级制度被证明强化了对护理权威的限制。权力动态通过性别化的劳动期望、专业把关和政策限制表现出来,所有这些都限制了护士进行倡导、领导和自主决策的能力。道德困扰、职场攻击和教育边缘化等问题被重新界定为系统性问题,而非嵌入更广泛排斥架构中的个人挑战。通过比较分析和改革模式,本讨论将围手术期自主权重新表述为对专业能动性的战略性收复,其基础是跨学科尊重和结构包容。最终,本文认为手术环境中的真正变革需要文化转变:一种将围手术期护士的定位从创新助手转变为手术护理架构师以及政策和实践共同创造者的转变。