• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简短负性评价恐惧量表-直接项目的心理测量学特性

Psychometric properties of the brief fear of negative evaluation scale-Straightforward items.

作者信息

Baldanzini Greta, Bottesi Gioia, Carleton R Nicholas, Granziol Umberto

机构信息

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.

Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 13;16:1572752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572752. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572752
PMID:40584074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12202352/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale-straightforward items (BFNE-S) within an Italian sample. Specifically, the study was designed to validate the scale factor structure, reliability, concurrent validity, and measurement invariance across sexes.

METHOD

A total of 652 participants (70.71% female and 29.29% males, aged 18-66) completed the BFNE-S and additional related scales including the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS), Social Phobia Scale (SPS), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), and the SCOFF Questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted to assess for a unidimensional structure, followed by testing of measurement invariance test between sexes. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega, and concurrent validity was tested through correlations with related measures.

RESULTS

The CFA supported the unidimensional structure of the BFNE-S with excellent fit indices (CFI = 0.998, RMSEA = 0.058). No measurement invariance violations were observed between sexes, despite their frequencies being slightly unbalanced. The BFNE-S demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96, McDonald's ω = 0.97). There were positive correlations among BFNE-S, the SIAS (ρ = 0.67), SPS (ρ = 0.67), as well as with DASS-21 subscales (i.e., depression, anxiety, stress) and SCOFF, and inverse correlations with RSES.

CONCLUSION

The BFNE-S exhibited robust reliability, validity, and measurement invariance across sexes in an Italian sample. Psychometric evidence supports the BFNE-S as a reliable tool for measuring fear of negative evaluation in the nonclinical population, providing a valuable resource for research and clinical assessments.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了意大利样本中简明负面评价恐惧量表直陈式条目(BFNE-S)的心理测量特性。具体而言,该研究旨在验证该量表的因子结构、信度、同时效度以及性别间的测量不变性。

方法

共有652名参与者(女性占70.71%,男性占29.29%,年龄在18至66岁之间)完成了BFNE-S及其他相关量表,包括社交互动焦虑量表(SIAS)、社交恐惧症量表(SPS)、罗森伯格自尊量表(RSES)、抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS-21)和SCOFF问卷。进行验证性因子分析(CFA)以评估单维结构,随后测试性别间的测量不变性。使用克朗巴哈α系数和麦克唐纳ω系数评估信度,并通过与相关测量的相关性测试同时效度。

结果

CFA支持BFNE-S的单维结构,拟合指数良好(CFI = 0.998,RMSEA = 0.058)。尽管性别频率略有不平衡,但未观察到性别间测量不变性的违反情况。BFNE-S表现出出色的内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.96,麦克唐纳ω系数 = 0.97)。BFNE-S与SIAS(ρ = 0.67)、SPS(ρ = 0.67)以及DASS-21分量表(即抑郁、焦虑、压力)和SCOFF之间呈正相关,与RSES呈负相关。

结论

BFNE-S在意大利样本中表现出强大的信度、效度和性别间的测量不变性。心理测量证据支持BFNE-S作为测量非临床人群负面评价恐惧的可靠工具,为研究和临床评估提供了宝贵资源。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the brief fear of negative evaluation scale-Straightforward items.简短负性评价恐惧量表-直接项目的心理测量学特性
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 13;16:1572752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572752. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
3
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.自闭症谱系知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.
4
Psychometric validation and measurement invariance of the self-compassion scale-short form (SCS-SF) across gender, clinical population, and cultures.自我同情量表简版(SCS-SF)在性别、临床人群和不同文化间的心理测量学验证及测量不变性
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03070-8.
5
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
6
The validation, reliability, and measurement invariance of the cognitive fusion questionnaire in Chinese community-dwelling adults.认知融合问卷在中国社区居住成年人中的效度、信度及测量不变性
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03011-5.
7
Validation of the Chinese version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 among young people in Hong Kong.中文版Connor-Davidson韧性量表-10在香港青少年中的效度验证。
East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;35(2):96-102. doi: 10.12809/eaap2565.
8
Italian validation of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire in spinal pain: a useful tool for clinicians and physiotherapist (CEQ-I).意大利对脊柱疼痛可信度/预期问卷的验证:临床医生和物理治疗师的有用工具(CEQ-I)
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2025 Jun 21;16:20406223251324812. doi: 10.1177/20406223251324812. eCollection 2025.
9
Development and psychometric evaluation of the fear of medical imaging radiation scale (FOMIRS): insights from multimethod analysis.医学影像辐射恐惧量表(FOMIRS)的编制与心理测量学评估:多方法分析的见解
Insights Imaging. 2025 Jun 27;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02018-1.
10
Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Professional Socialization Scale for Hospital Nurses: A Methodological Study.医院护士专业社会化量表波斯语版本的心理测量学评估:一项方法学研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Jun 19;11:23779608251345276. doi: 10.1177/23779608251345276. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale - straight forwardly in patients with systemic sclerosis.《简明负性评价恐惧量表土耳其语版在系统性硬化症患者中的效度和信度》
Malawi Med J. 2023 Sep;35(3):163-169. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v35i3.5.
2
Beyond Positive Affect: Discrete Positive Emotions Differentiate Major Depression from Social Anxiety Disorder.超越积极情绪:离散的积极情绪区分重度抑郁症与社交焦虑障碍。
Cognit Ther Res. 2023;47(3):377-385. doi: 10.1007/s10608-023-10355-y. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
3
The importance of high quality real-life social interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,高质量的真实社交互动至关重要。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 4;13(1):3675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30803-9.
4
The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Social Anxiety: A Systematic Review.新冠疫情对社交焦虑的影响:系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2362. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032362.
5
Conditional effects of state fear of negative evaluation on restrictive eating behaviors.状态性负面评价恐惧对限制性饮食行为的条件效应。
Eat Behav. 2022 Dec;47:101676. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2022.101676. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
6
Fear of negative evaluation modulates the processing of social evaluative feedback with different valence and contexts.对负面评价的恐惧会调节不同效价和情境下的社会评价反馈的处理。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Apr 4;33(8):4927-4938. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac390.
7
Social anxiety and behavioral assessments of social cognition: A systematic review.社交焦虑与社会认知行为评估:系统综述。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Aug 15;311:17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.130. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
8
Fear of negative evaluation and suicidal ideation among college students: the moderating role of impulsivity-like traits.大学生对负面评价的恐惧和自杀意念:冲动特质的调节作用。
J Am Coll Health. 2023 Feb-Mar;71(2):396-402. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1891919. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
9
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
10
Reliability and Validity of Three Versions of the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study.三种简短负面评价恐惧量表在系统性硬化症患者中的信度和效度:硬皮病患者为中心干预网络队列研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Nov;70(11):1646-1652. doi: 10.1002/acr.23532.