Mendiratta Shivi, Mukkelli Vinay Gandhi, Baidya Kayal Esha, Khanna Puneet, Mehndiratta Amit
Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IITD), New Delhi, India.
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 26;11:20552076251352988. doi: 10.1177/20552076251352988. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Mechanical ventilation is essential in intensive care units (ICUs) but poses risks such as ventilator-associated complications and high costs. The accuracy of predicting mechanical ventilation duration using clinical information is limited. Predicting ventilation duration accurately can aid clinical decisions like resource-allocation and early tracheostomy-planning.
To develop explainable artificial intelligence (AI) models for predicting mechanical ventilation duration leveraging diverse clinical parameters from ICU patient data.
This development and testing study analysed 323 mechanically ventilated patients {(n = 323, Male:Female = 160:163, Age = 42.87 ± 19.54 years (mean ± standard deviation)} from three ICUs at AIIMS, Delhi. The dataset included 100-clinical parameters per patient. Two models were developed: (1) A regression model (n = 323) to predict ventilation duration in days, and (2) A classification model (n = 218, non-tracheostomized) to predict short- (≤3 days) vs. long-term (>3 days) ventilation requirements. The misclassification-cost was altered for the classification model. Feature selection was performed using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) on a random forest model, and training was done with 5-fold cross-validation (80% training, 20% testing).
The least-squares boosting regression model achieved root mean squared error (RMSE) of 4.66 days and coefficient of Determination (R²) of 0.65 using 34-SHAP-selected features, with tracheostomy (53.66% importance) being the top predictor. The best classification model, K-nearest neighbours, achieved 79.1% accuracy, Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic-curve (AUROC) of 0.82, sensitivity of 71.4%, and specificity of 86.4% using 47-SHAP-selected features. Key predictors included ICU admission type (8.1%), PO (5.6%), and pH (5%).
AI-driven prediction of ventilation duration can enhance ICU workflows, optimize resource use, and improve personalized care. SHAP-based feature selection promotes AI interpretability, aiding clinical adoption.
机械通气在重症监护病房(ICU)中至关重要,但会带来诸如呼吸机相关并发症和高成本等风险。利用临床信息预测机械通气持续时间的准确性有限。准确预测通气持续时间有助于做出资源分配和早期气管切开计划等临床决策。
利用ICU患者数据中的多种临床参数,开发可解释的人工智能(AI)模型来预测机械通气持续时间。
这项开发和测试研究分析了来自德里全印医学科学研究所三个ICU的323例接受机械通气的患者{(n = 323,男性:女性 = 160:163,年龄 = 42.87 ± 19.54岁(平均值 ± 标准差))}。数据集包括每位患者的100个临床参数。开发了两个模型:(1)一个回归模型(n = 323),用于预测以天为单位的通气持续时间;(2)一个分类模型(n = 218,非气管切开患者),用于预测短期(≤3天)与长期(>3天)通气需求。对分类模型的误分类成本进行了调整。使用随机森林模型上的Shapley加性解释(SHAP)进行特征选择,并采用5折交叉验证(80%训练,20%测试)进行训练。
最小二乘提升回归模型使用34个经SHAP选择的特征,实现了均方根误差(RMSE)为4.66天,决定系数(R²)为0.65,气管切开(重要性为53.66%)是首要预测因素。最佳分类模型K近邻,使用47个经SHAP选择的特征,准确率达到79.1%,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.82,灵敏度为71.4%,特异性为86.4%。关键预测因素包括ICU入院类型(8.1%)、PO(5.6%)和pH(5%)。
AI驱动的通气持续时间预测可以优化ICU工作流程,合理利用资源,并改善个性化护理。基于SHAP的特征选择提高了AI的可解释性,有助于临床应用。