Suppr超能文献

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)临床医生对加拿大心血管学会TAVI术后驾驶指南的观点综述。

Review of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Insertion (TAVI) Clinician Opinions on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Post-TAVI Driving Guidelines.

作者信息

Jarvis Catherine R, Gouda Pishoy, Ezekowitz Justin, Van Spall Harriette G C, Tyrrell Benjamin, Welsh Robert C

机构信息

Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

CJC Open. 2025 Apr 10;7(6):843-850. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.04.004. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As compared to surgical aortic valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI) has a lower perioperative risk and an abbreviated recovery. In the absence of robust clinical data to guide decision-making, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society has now recommended the same 1-month driving restriction for both procedures.

METHODS

In April 2024, a 15-question survey was circulated to all 31 Canadian TAVI centres to explore opinions on the current driving recommendations and the safety of driving post TAVI, with the goal of informing updated expert-informed guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 31 TAVI centres, 29 individuals from 25 centres (80.6%) provided responses. The majority (79.3%) expressed that a 1-month driving prohibition was "too long," and 20.7% stated that this restriction was appropriate. When asked to suggest a new post-TAVI driving recommendation for successful, uncomplicated, transfemoral TAVI patients, 41.4% proposed that patients be prohibited from driving for 2 weeks, 24.1% suggested 1 week, 13.8% were supportive of 1 month, and 6.9% were supportive of either 3 weeks, 72 hours, or 48 hours. The predominant driving-related concern was the development of conduction abnormalities (89.7%). A longer driving prohibition (≥ 1 month) was suggested in cases of alternative-access TAVI (transapical: 67.7%; alternative arterial: 51.6%), access-site and/or vascular complications (48.4%), and conduction abnormalities without a pacemaker (45.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of Canadian TAVI programs expressed that a 1-month driving restriction period was overly cautious and that shorter restriction periods would be more appropriate. Ultimately, before any change to post-TAVI driving restrictions may be considered, a clinical assessment of patient recovery post TAVI is needed.

摘要

背景

与外科主动脉瓣置换术相比,经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)围手术期风险更低,恢复时间更短。由于缺乏有力的临床数据来指导决策,加拿大心血管学会目前建议对这两种手术实施相同的1个月驾驶限制。

方法

2024年4月,向加拿大所有31个TAVI中心发放了一份包含15个问题的调查问卷,以探讨对当前驾驶建议以及TAVI术后驾驶安全性的看法,目的是为更新后的专家指导指南提供依据。

结果

在31个TAVI中心中,来自25个中心的29人(80.6%)提供了回复。大多数人(79.3%)表示1个月的驾驶禁令“太长”,20.7%的人表示这种限制是合适的。当被要求为成功、无并发症的经股动脉TAVI患者提出新的TAVI术后驾驶建议时,41.4%的人提议患者应被禁止驾驶2周,24.1%的人建议1周,13.8%的人支持1个月,6.9%的人支持3周、72小时或48小时。与驾驶相关的主要担忧是传导异常(89.7%)。对于经心尖TAVI(67.7%)、经其他动脉途径TAVI(51.6%)、穿刺部位和/或血管并发症(48.4%)以及无起搏器的传导异常(45.2%)的情况,建议延长驾驶禁令(≥1个月)。

结论

大多数加拿大TAVI项目表示,1个月的驾驶限制期过于谨慎,较短的限制期会更合适。最终,在考虑对TAVI术后驾驶限制做出任何改变之前,需要对患者TAVI术后的恢复情况进行临床评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b5c/12198631/63b90d51f3d7/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验