• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用人群风险预测进行医疗保健规划:对医疗保健规划者经验与观点的定性研究

Using population risk prediction for healthcare planning: a qualitative study of healthcare planners' experiences and views.

作者信息

George Julie, Ramsay Angus I G, Crowe Sonya, Hayward Andrew

机构信息

Institute of Health Informatics, UCL, London WC1E 7HB, UK.

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL, London WC1E 7HB, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2025 Aug 29;47(3):540-549. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaf070.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdaf070
PMID:40588809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12395939/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although English National Health Service (NHS) policymakers are eager to mandate use of data analytics to inform healthcare planning and prevention, little is known about what happens in practice. This study investigated the ways in which planners within the local payer organizations use population risk prediction models to inform their planning of healthcare and enablers and barriers to use of such tools.

METHODS

Qualitative case study design across five payer organizations. Interviews (n = 20) were conducted with senior decision-makers from various backgrounds. Analysis was guided by diffusion of innovation frameworks.

RESULTS

Financially stable organizations with existing investment in health intelligence using linked data were more likely to report use of risk prediction in their planning practice. Obstacles to uptake identified were financial instability; workforce capacity to consider use of such intelligence; distraction by centrally mandated system changes; concerns about completeness, accuracy, and timeliness of data; and interest in other sources of insight to inform planning such as patient experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Those working in healthcare, public health, or health intelligence need to recognize that financial and organizational stability are as important as investment in staff capacity/skills and data systems to increase the use of risk prediction to support prevention in the NHS.

摘要

背景

尽管英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的政策制定者急于强制使用数据分析来为医疗保健规划和预防提供信息,但对于实际情况却知之甚少。本研究调查了当地医保机构的规划人员使用人群风险预测模型为医疗保健规划提供信息的方式,以及使用此类工具的促进因素和障碍。

方法

对五个医保机构进行定性案例研究设计。对来自不同背景的高级决策者进行了访谈(n = 20)。分析以创新扩散框架为指导。

结果

在利用关联数据对健康情报进行了现有投资的财务稳定组织中,更有可能在规划实践中报告使用风险预测。确定的采用障碍包括财务不稳定;考虑使用此类情报的劳动力能力;因中央强制的系统变革而分心;对数据的完整性、准确性和及时性的担忧;以及对其他规划洞察来源(如患者体验)的兴趣。

结论

医疗保健、公共卫生或健康情报领域的工作人员需要认识到,财务和组织稳定性与对员工能力/技能和数据系统的投资同样重要,以增加风险预测的使用,从而在NHS中支持预防工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3edf/12395939/77668bfe69f4/fdaf070f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3edf/12395939/77668bfe69f4/fdaf070f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3edf/12395939/77668bfe69f4/fdaf070f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Using population risk prediction for healthcare planning: a qualitative study of healthcare planners' experiences and views.利用人群风险预测进行医疗保健规划:对医疗保健规划者经验与观点的定性研究
J Public Health (Oxf). 2025 Aug 29;47(3):540-549. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaf070.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Evaluation of the NHS England Low-Calorie Diet implementation pilot: a coproduced mixed-method study.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)低热量饮食实施试点评估:一项联合开展的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(29):1-63. doi: 10.3310/MPRT2139.
5
Optimising the delivery and impacts of interventions to improve hospital doctors' workplace wellbeing in the NHS: The Care Under Pressure 3 realist evaluation study.优化干预措施的实施与影响,以改善英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中医院医生的工作场所幸福感:“压力下的护理3”现实主义评价研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Aug;13(30):1-35. doi: 10.3310/PASQ1155.
6
Remote and digital services in UK general practice 2021-2023: the Remote by Default 2 longitudinal qualitative study synopsis.2021 - 2023年英国全科医疗中的远程和数字服务:“默认远程”2纵向定性研究概要
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(31):1-49. doi: 10.3310/QQTT4411.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
9
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
10
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.

本文引用的文献

1
Will a new NHS structure in England help recovery from the pandemic?英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的新架构会有助于从疫情中恢复过来吗?
BMJ. 2021 Feb 3;372:n248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n248.
2
Examining innovation in hospital units: a complex adaptive systems approach.医院单位创新研究:复杂适应系统方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05403-2.
3
Population segmentation based on healthcare needs: a systematic review.基于医疗需求的人群细分:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 13;8(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1105-6.
4
Healthcare teams as complex adaptive systems: understanding team behaviour through team members' perception of interpersonal interaction.作为复杂适应系统的医疗团队:通过团队成员对人际互动的感知来理解团队行为。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 20;18(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3392-3.
5
Concurrence of big data analytics and healthcare: A systematic review.大数据分析与医疗保健的并存:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jun;114:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
6
Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions.合成控制法作为一种评估人群健康干预措施的工具。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Aug;72(8):673-678. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-210106. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
7
Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies.超越采用:一个用于理论化和评估健康与护理技术的未采用、废弃以及扩大规模、传播和可持续性挑战的新框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):e367. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8775.
8
Sustainability and transformation plans for the NHS in England: what do they say and what happens next?英格兰国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的可持续性与转型计划:它们说了什么以及接下来会发生什么?
BMJ. 2017 Mar 28;356:j1541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1541.
9
Challenges and Opportunities of Big Data in Health Care: A Systematic Review.医疗保健领域大数据的挑战与机遇:一项系统综述。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Nov 21;4(4):e38. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5359.
10
Considering chance in quality and safety performance measures: an analysis of performance reports by boards in English NHS trusts.考量质量与安全绩效指标中的偶然性:对英国国民健康服务信托机构董事会绩效报告的分析
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jan;26(1):61-69. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004967. Epub 2016 Mar 31.