Yii Fabian, MacCormick Ian J C, Strang Niall, Bernabeu Miguel O, MacGillivray Tom
Robert O. Curle Ophthalmology Suite, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Jul 1;66(9):1. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.9.1.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of a novel anatomical metric of ametropia-fundus refraction offset (FRO)-in stratifying the risk of retinal detachment (RD) or breaks, beyond the influence of risk factors including spherical equivalent refraction (SER).
Participants from the UK Biobank with no prior history of RD/breaks were analyzed (n = 9320). The onset of RD/breaks over a 12-year follow-up period was determined based on linked healthcare data. A previously trained deep learning model was applied to each fundus photograph to predict SER. FRO was defined as the error in the fundus-predicted SER, with a negative value indicating a relatively myopic-looking fundus. Cox regression was used to examine the association of baseline FRO with RD/breaks-adjusting for baseline SER, baseline age, sex, and cataract surgery during follow-up. In a subgroup of participants (n = 7127) with high-quality optical coherence tomography scans, we additionally adjusted for baseline macular thickness (MT). All analyses initially considered any RD/breaks as the event, followed by rhegmatogenous RD/breaks.
The mean (SD) baseline age was 54.8 (8.2) years. Sixty-four participants developed RD/breaks (of any subcategory), with a mean (SD) of 7.0 (3.3) years between baseline and disease onset. A more negative baseline FRO was independently associated with an increased risk of any RD/breaks (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50-0.87, P = 0.003) and rhegmatogenous RD/breaks (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.45-0.82, P = 0.001). Similar independent associations were evident in the subgroup analysis that additionally adjusted for MT.
A more negative baseline FRO is associated with a higher risk of developing RD/breaks, even among individuals with similar baseline SER and other risk factors. This demonstrates a potential benefit of shifting towards an anatomic definition of myopia.
本研究旨在探讨一种新的屈光不正解剖学指标——眼底屈光偏移(FRO),在超越包括等效球镜度(SER)在内的危险因素影响的情况下,对视网膜脱离(RD)或视网膜裂孔风险进行分层的潜力。
对英国生物银行中无RD/视网膜裂孔既往史的参与者进行分析(n = 9320)。基于关联的医疗保健数据确定12年随访期内RD/视网膜裂孔的发病情况。将一个先前训练好的深度学习模型应用于每张眼底照片以预测SER。FRO定义为眼底预测的SER中的误差,负值表示眼底相对近视。使用Cox回归分析来检验基线FRO与RD/视网膜裂孔之间的关联,并对基线SER、基线年龄、性别以及随访期间的白内障手术进行校正。在一组高质量光学相干断层扫描的参与者亚组(n = 7127)中,我们还对基线黄斑厚度(MT)进行了校正。所有分析最初将任何RD/视网膜裂孔视为事件,随后是孔源性RD/视网膜裂孔。
平均(标准差)基线年龄为54.8(8.2)岁。64名参与者发生了RD/视网膜裂孔(任何亚类),从基线到疾病发作的平均(标准差)时间为7.0(3.3)年。基线FRO越负,与任何RD/视网膜裂孔风险增加独立相关(校正风险比[HR] = 0.66,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.50 - 0.87,P = 0.003)以及孔源性RD/视网膜裂孔(HR = 0.61,95% CI = 0.45 - 0.82,P = 0.001)。在额外校正了MT的亚组分析中,类似的独立关联也很明显。
即使在具有相似基线SER和其他危险因素的个体中,基线FRO越负,发生RD/视网膜裂孔的风险越高。这表明转向近视的解剖学定义可能具有潜在益处。