Fang Bingxue, Tian Yan, Zhang Yuehua
School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Room 923, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Innovation Center of Yangtze River Delta, Zhejiang University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03256-w.
Informed decision-making is pivotal for end-of-life (EOL) care aligns with patients' preferences, thereby enhancing the quality of dying. However, limited research has analyzed how individuals' prior exposure to life-sustaining treatment (LST) shapes informed EOL choices. This study addresses this gap by investigating the impact of LST witnessed experiences on EOL decision-making among the elderly in China.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of primary data from 571 elderly residents in a public nursing home. Logistic regression and marginal effect analyses were performed to examine associations between LST witnessed experiences and informed EOL choices. LST witnessed experiences were categorized into five items: cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), tracheal intubation, tube feeding, expensive antibiotics use, and hemodialysis. We assessed variations in marginal effects across these five LST items. Subgroup analyses evaluated differences stratified by education levels and monthly pension. Partial correlations analyses and interaction effect analyses were further employed to investigate the dual role of death taboo in mediating both LST witnessed experiences and informed EOL choices.
Elderly individuals with LST witnessed experiences exhibited a higher demand for informed EOL care (OR = 1.551, 90% CI: 1.095 to 2.196, p < 0.05) compared to those without LST witnessed experiences. There was 7.5 percentage-point increase in the predicted probability of choosing informed EOL care (90% CI: 0.016 to 0.134, p < 0.05) associated with LST witnessed experiences. Specifically, witnessing CPR (incremental effect = 0.079, 90% CI: 0.003 to 0.155, p < 0.1) and tube feeding (incremental effect = 0.085, 90% CI: 0.020 to 0.150, p < 0.05) significantly influenced informed EOL choices. Subgroup analyses revealed that these effects were stronger among individuals with lower educational attainment and monthly pensions.
LST witnessed experiences were significantly associated with more informed EOL choices among the elderly, highlighting the role of firsthand medical experiences in shaping care preferences. To optimize EOL decision-making, targeted death education programs-particularly for socioeconomically disadvantaged groups with limited health literacy-are critical in clinical and community settings.
知情决策对于临终(EOL)护理至关重要,它与患者的偏好相一致,从而提高死亡质量。然而,仅有有限的研究分析了个人先前接受维持生命治疗(LST)的经历如何影响知情的临终选择。本研究通过调查在中国老年人中LST目睹经历对临终决策的影响来填补这一空白。
我们对一家公立养老院的571名老年居民的原始数据进行了横断面分析。进行了逻辑回归和边际效应分析,以检验LST目睹经历与知情的临终选择之间的关联。LST目睹经历分为五个项目:心肺复苏(CPR)、气管插管、鼻饲、使用昂贵抗生素和血液透析。我们评估了这五个LST项目的边际效应差异。亚组分析评估了按教育水平和月养老金分层的差异。进一步采用偏相关分析和交互效应分析,以研究死亡禁忌在介导LST目睹经历和知情的临终选择中的双重作用。
与没有LST目睹经历的老年人相比,有LST目睹经历的老年人对知情的临终护理有更高的需求(OR = 1.551,90%CI:1.095至2.196,p < 0.05)。与LST目睹经历相关的选择知情的临终护理的预测概率增加了7.5个百分点(90%CI:0.016至0.134,p < 0.05)。具体而言,目睹心肺复苏(增量效应 = 0.079,90%CI:0.003至0.155,p < 0.1)和鼻饲(增量效应 = 0.085,90%CI:0.020至0.150,p < 0.05)显著影响了知情的临终选择。亚组分析显示,这些影响在教育程度较低和月养老金较低的个体中更强。
LST目睹经历与老年人更知情的临终选择显著相关,突出了第一手医疗经历在塑造护理偏好方面的作用。为了优化临终决策,针对性的死亡教育项目——特别是针对健康素养有限的社会经济弱势群体——在临床和社区环境中至关重要。