Cope Rachel, Reagon Carly
Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Apr 21;88(7):408-419. doi: 10.1177/03080226241306590. eCollection 2025 Jul.
There is a small and low-quality body of evidence to support bed positioning as an intervention. Difficulties in developing the evidence base through experimental studies have been recognised and further research has been recommended.
Using a qualitative descriptive design, 13 occupational therapists were recruited from a health board in Wales, UK. Two separate focus groups ( = 5 and = 8) were held using a semi-structured interview schedule. The data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-stage approach to thematic analysis.
Five key themes were established. These relate to role ambiguity, variations across services, the need for training, recognising bed positioning as an individualised intervention, and effectiveness of the intervention.
The following key findings and recommendations are outlined: (1) Bed positioning interventions are individualised. (2) The optimal timing of bed positioning assessments and interventions for inpatients is debated. (3) Multidisciplinary involvement is needed for effective implementation of bed positioning interventions. (4) Variations across services exist, causing inconsistencies in service provision. (5) More training and support in this area of practice are desired by occupational therapists. (6) More research into the clinical effectiveness of bed positioning interventions is welcomed to support clinical justification.
支持将床位摆放作为一种干预措施的证据数量少且质量不高。人们已经认识到通过实验研究建立证据基础存在困难,并建议开展进一步研究。
采用定性描述性设计,从英国威尔士的一个健康委员会招募了13名职业治疗师。使用半结构化访谈提纲进行了两个独立的焦点小组访谈(一组5人,另一组8人)。采用布劳恩和克拉克的六阶段主题分析方法对数据进行分析。
确定了五个关键主题。这些主题涉及角色模糊、服务差异、培训需求、将床位摆放视为个性化干预措施以及干预措施的有效性。
概述了以下主要发现和建议:(1)床位摆放干预措施是个性化的。(2)关于住院患者床位摆放评估和干预的最佳时机存在争议。(3)有效实施床位摆放干预措施需要多学科参与。(4)各服务之间存在差异,导致服务提供不一致。(5)职业治疗师希望在这一实践领域获得更多培训和支持。(6)欢迎对床位摆放干预措施的临床有效性进行更多研究,以支持临床依据。