• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究数字时代影响老年人采用智能集成设备的因素:行为设计理论的见解

Examining factors influencing the adoption of smart integrated devices by the elderly in the digital era: insights from behavioral design theory.

作者信息

Sun Sijie, Qi Na, Li Haoran, Xiao Liang

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Design Graduate Schools, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 17;16:1540201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1540201. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1540201
PMID:40599535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12209356/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Digitalization and aging are two defining characteristics of contemporary social transformation. As smart integrated devices become increasingly embedded in everyday life, understanding how elderly individuals interact with these technologies is essential for promoting digital inclusion and social integration. Although previous research has examined digital engagement among older adults, the specific behavioral and contextual factors that shape their usage of smart devices in a digital society remain underexplored. This study seeks to clarify how these factors operate and how they may be leveraged to support the well-being of the aging population.

METHODS

This study utilized data from the 2020 China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey (CLASS), focusing on elderly individuals living in urban areas. A combination of logistic regression analysis, Lasso regression, and robustness tests was employed to identify the key predictors of smart integrated device usage. The analysis examined a range of variables including demographic characteristics, health status, education, income, internet usage experience, and family structure. Comparisons were made across groups to assess how these factors influence usage behavior, and Lasso regression was used to identify the most robust predictors.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that elderly individuals are more likely to use smart devices if they are male, older, married, in poorer health, more highly educated, have lower income, have fewer children, and have previous experience using the internet. Among these, internet usage experience emerged as the most significant and consistent predictor across all models, as identified by the Lasso regression. Furthermore, the purposes for which the elderly use the internet, such as communication, information, or entertainment. These patterns were found to be stable even after controlling for potential confounding variables.

DISCUSSION

The findings challenge traditional assumptions about fixed sensory or cognitive hierarchies in aging populations and instead suggest that smart device usage among the elderly is shaped by a dynamic interplay of motivational, ability-based, and environmental factors. Drawing on Behavioral Design Theory, the study interprets these patterns through three lenses: motivation (e.g., health monitoring and social interaction), ability (e.g., physical and cognitive usability of devices), and triggers (e.g., technical and emotional support from family members). Under this framework, digital engagement appears to be highly context-dependent, with adaptive resource allocation and social support playing a crucial role in determining whether and how elderly individuals use smart technologies. The results emphasize the importance of designing inclusive digital environments and policies that respond to the nuanced needs and experiences of the aging population.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5047/12209356/b42891c02e72/fpsyg-16-1540201-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5047/12209356/b42891c02e72/fpsyg-16-1540201-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5047/12209356/b42891c02e72/fpsyg-16-1540201-g001.jpg
摘要

引言

数字化和老龄化是当代社会转型的两个决定性特征。随着智能集成设备越来越融入日常生活,了解老年人如何与这些技术互动对于促进数字包容和社会融合至关重要。尽管先前的研究已经考察了老年人的数字参与情况,但在数字社会中塑造他们对智能设备使用的具体行为和背景因素仍未得到充分探索。本研究旨在阐明这些因素如何发挥作用,以及如何利用它们来支持老年人口的福祉。

方法

本研究利用了2020年中国老年社会追踪调查(CLASS)的数据,重点关注居住在城市地区的老年人。采用逻辑回归分析、套索回归和稳健性检验相结合的方法来确定智能集成设备使用的关键预测因素。分析考察了一系列变量,包括人口特征、健康状况、教育程度、收入、互联网使用经验和家庭结构。对不同群体进行比较,以评估这些因素如何影响使用行为,并使用套索回归来确定最稳健的预测因素。

结果

分析表明,如果老年人是男性、年龄较大、已婚、健康状况较差、受教育程度较高、收入较低、子女较少且有过互联网使用经验,那么他们更有可能使用智能设备。其中,互联网使用经验在所有模型中都是最显著且一致的预测因素,这是由套索回归确定的。此外,老年人使用互联网的目的,如通信、信息或娱乐。即使在控制了潜在的混杂变量之后,这些模式仍然稳定。

讨论

研究结果挑战了关于老年人群体中固定感官或认知层次结构的传统假设,相反,表明老年人对智能设备的使用是由动机、基于能力和环境因素的动态相互作用所塑造的。借鉴行为设计理论,本研究通过三个视角来解释这些模式:动机(如健康监测和社交互动)、能力(如设备的物理和认知可用性)和触发因素(如家庭成员的技术和情感支持)。在此框架下,数字参与似乎高度依赖于背景,适应性资源分配和社会支持在决定老年人是否以及如何使用智能技术方面发挥着关键作用。研究结果强调了设计包容性数字环境和政策以回应老年人群体细微需求和经验的重要性。

相似文献

1
Examining factors influencing the adoption of smart integrated devices by the elderly in the digital era: insights from behavioral design theory.探究数字时代影响老年人采用智能集成设备的因素:行为设计理论的见解
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 17;16:1540201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1540201. eCollection 2025.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
5
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Ageism and the digital divide in Switzerland during COVID-19: Lessons for the post-pandemic world.瑞士在 COVID-19 大流行期间的年龄歧视和数字鸿沟:后疫情世界的教训。
J Aging Stud. 2024 Jun;69:101227. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101227. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
2
Digital exclusion and cognitive impairment in older people: findings from five longitudinal studies.老年人的数字排斥和认知障碍:五项纵向研究的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 May 7;24(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05026-w.
3
Older Adults and New Technology: Mapping Review of the Factors Associated With Older Adults' Intention to Adopt Digital Technologies.
老年人与新技术:对与老年人采用数字技术意愿相关因素的映射综述
JMIR Aging. 2023 May 16;6:e44564. doi: 10.2196/44564.
4
Association of Co-Living and Age on the Type of Sports Practiced by Older People.共同居住与年龄对老年人所从事运动类型的影响
Sports (Basel). 2022 Dec 5;10(12):200. doi: 10.3390/sports10120200.
5
Social Media Communication and Loneliness Among Older Adults: The Mediating Roles of Social Support and Social Contact.社交媒体交流与老年人孤独感:社会支持和社会联系的中介作用。
Gerontologist. 2021 Aug 13;61(6):888-896. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa197.
6
Social Support and "Playing Around": An Examination of How Older Adults Acquire Digital Literacy With Tablet Computers.社会支持与“随性摆弄”:老年人如何通过平板电脑获得数字素养的考察
J Appl Gerontol. 2017 Jan;36(1):29-55. doi: 10.1177/0733464815609440. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
7
Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM).香港华裔老年人对老年技术的接受度:一种老年技术接受模型(STAM)。
Ergonomics. 2014;57(5):635-52. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.895855. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
8
Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review.影响接受就地老龄化技术的因素:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Apr;83(4):235-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
9
Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities.残疾和非残疾老年人的技术使用模式。
Gerontologist. 2015 Jun;55(3):412-21. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt166. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
10
The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use.低收入居家老年人中的数字鸿沟:互联网使用模式、电子健康素养以及对计算机/互联网使用的态度。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 2;15(5):e93. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2645.