• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者对支持中风康复及回归日常生活的环境因素的看法。

Stakeholder Perspectives on Built Environmental Factors to Support Stroke Rehabilitation and Return to Everyday Life.

作者信息

de Vries Laila, Kylén Maya, Svensson Tony, Sturge Jodi, Lipson-Smith Ruby, Schmidt Steven M, Pessah-Rasmussen Hélène, Elf Marie

机构信息

School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.

Faculty of Health Science, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70339. doi: 10.1111/hex.70339.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70339
PMID:40600503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12215816/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The transition to undertaking rehabilitation in the home or local neighbourhood calls for an extensive understanding of which aspects of the built environment are important for people with stroke.

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative study aims to explore how home and local neighbourhood environments support or hinder rehabilitation for people who have had a stroke from the perspectives of various stakeholders.

METHODS

Through a purposive selection method, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 stakeholders: people with stroke (n = 3), significant others (n = 3), healthcare professionals (n = 4), care managers (n = 3) and architects (n = 3). Content analysis was used to identify patterns and create themes.

FINDINGS

Sixteen stakeholders, including 12 women and 4 men aged 30-74, participated in this study. Our findings identify areas linked to the WHO age-friendly environment framework, which addresses environmental limitations relevant to stroke rehabilitation. The categories used and factors identified: (1) Outdoor environments: accessibility, safety and supportiveness. (2) Transport and mobility: accessible and reach central services. (3) Housing: adaptations, layout and accessibility. (4) Social participation: spaces that are varied and flexible. (5) Social inclusion and non-discrimination: shared decision-making. (6) Civic engagement and employment: supporting environments. (7) Communication and information: digital accessibility. (8) Community and health services: patient-centred approach and access to varied rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

This study brings together multiple perspectives from key stakeholders with experience within stroke care. By integrating insights, these findings highlight how built environmental factors in the home and local neighbourhood can support the transition to home-based rehabilitation, which can improve recovery and return to everyday life. In turn, this study contributes to the innovative development of home and neighbourhood environments to influence and support stroke rehabilitation. Linking the findings to the WHO framework increases our understanding of a supportive environment for people with stroke, but also for people with other long-term conditions.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This qualitative study is part of a comprehensive research project '(Built Environments to support rehabilitation for people with stroke, B-SURE)', which aims to investigate how factors in the built environment influence stroke rehabilitation and to develop built environment solutions. B-SURE has a participatory methodology that essentially includes and involves the stakeholders in the multiple stages of the study and ensures an iterative and collaborative process.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/12215816/136bace908c2/HEX-28-e70339-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/12215816/136bace908c2/HEX-28-e70339-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca7/12215816/136bace908c2/HEX-28-e70339-g001.jpg
摘要

背景

向在家中或当地社区进行康复的转变需要深入了解建筑环境的哪些方面对中风患者很重要。

目的

这项定性研究旨在从不同利益相关者的角度探讨家庭和当地社区环境如何支持或阻碍中风患者的康复。

方法

通过目的抽样法,对16名利益相关者进行半结构化访谈收集数据,包括中风患者(n = 3)、重要他人(n = 3)、医疗保健专业人员(n = 4)、护理经理(n = 3)和建筑师(n = 3)。采用内容分析法识别模式并创建主题。

结果

16名利益相关者参与了本研究,包括12名女性和4名年龄在30 - 74岁之间的男性。我们的研究结果确定了与世界卫生组织友好型年龄环境框架相关的领域,该框架涉及与中风康复相关的环境限制。所使用的类别和确定的因素包括:(1)户外环境:可达性、安全性和支持性。(2)交通与出行:可达并能到达中心服务设施。(3)住房:适应性、布局和可达性。(4)社会参与:多样且灵活的空间。(5)社会包容与非歧视:共同决策。(6)公民参与和就业:支持性环境。(7)沟通与信息:数字可达性。(8)社区和卫生服务:以患者为中心的方法和获得多样化康复服务的机会。

结论

本研究汇集了中风护理领域关键利益相关者的多种观点。通过整合这些见解,这些研究结果突出了家庭和当地社区的建筑环境因素如何支持向居家康复的转变,这有助于改善康复效果并回归日常生活。反过来,本研究有助于家庭和社区环境的创新发展,以影响和支持中风康复。将研究结果与世界卫生组织框架相联系,不仅增加了我们对中风患者支持性环境的理解,也加深了对其他长期疾病患者支持性环境的理解。

患者或公众贡献

这项定性研究是综合研究项目“支持中风患者康复的建筑环境(B - SURE)”的一部分,该项目旨在调查建筑环境中的因素如何影响中风康复,并开发建筑环境解决方案。B - SURE采用参与式方法,本质上在研究的多个阶段纳入并让利益相关者参与其中,并确保一个迭代和协作的过程。

相似文献

1
Stakeholder Perspectives on Built Environmental Factors to Support Stroke Rehabilitation and Return to Everyday Life.利益相关者对支持中风康复及回归日常生活的环境因素的看法。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70339. doi: 10.1111/hex.70339.
2
Speech and Language Therapy Weekend Service in Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study Exploring Perspectives of People With Stroke.住院康复中的言语和语言治疗周末服务:一项探索中风患者观点的定性研究
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70077. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70077.
3
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
6
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with social isolation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中风患者社会隔离的相关因素:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2025 Feb;34(2):108201. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108201. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
2
Allocating municipal services to individuals with complex rehabilitation needs - a discourse analysis of individual administrative decision letters.为具有复杂康复需求的个人分配市政服务 - 个体行政决策信的话语分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10972-7.
3
Built Environments to Support Rehabilitation for People With Stroke From the Hospital to the Home (B-Sure): Protocol for a Mixed Method Participatory Co-Design Study.
支持中风患者从医院到家庭康复的建成环境(B-Sure):一项混合方法参与式协同设计研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 9;12:e52489. doi: 10.2196/52489.
4
The importance of context-a qualitative study exploring healthcare practitioners' experiences of working with patients at home after a stroke.背景的重要性——一项定性研究,探讨了医疗保健从业者在中风后在家中与患者一起工作的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):733. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09735-7.
5
The role of the physical environment in stroke recovery: Evidence-based design principles from a mixed-methods multiple case study.物理环境在中风康复中的作用:基于混合方法多案例研究的循证设计原则。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 9;18(6):e0280690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280690. eCollection 2023.
6
Housing Accessibility at Home and Rehabilitation Outcomes After a Stroke: An Explorative Study.居家可达性与卒中后康复结局:一项探索性研究。
HERD. 2023 Oct;16(4):172-186. doi: 10.1177/19375867231178313. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
7
A Meta-Analysis on the Influence of Age-Friendly Environments on Older Adults' Physical and Mental Well-Being.老龄化友好环境对老年人身心健康影响的元分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 24;19(21):13813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113813.
8
Effects of Objective and Perceived Social Isolation on Cardiovascular and Brain Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.客观和感知社会孤立对心血管和大脑健康的影响:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;11(16):e026493. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026493. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
9
Body structure/function impairments and activity limitations of post-stroke that predict social participation: a systematic review.脑卒中后身体结构/功能障碍和活动受限预测社会参与的因素:系统评价。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023 Sep;30(6):589-602. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2022.2095086. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
10
"Well in in this neighborhood I have walked, not at all": Stroke survivors lived experience in the outdoor environment.“我在这个社区里走来走去,一点也不觉得陌生”:中风幸存者的户外环境生活体验。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115107. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115107. Epub 2022 Jun 2.