Zhu Jing, Xiao Heng, Zhou Rui, Gan Xiaochuang, Gou Qitao, Tie Hongtao
Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Immunity, Inflammation & Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):997. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07274-9.
BOPPPS (Bridge-in, Objective, Preassessment, Participatory learning, Post-assessment, Summary) has emerged as a compelling alternative in clinical and health education, particularly in medical and nursing education. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of BOPPPS in clinical and health education, with a primary focus on medical education, while also considering its applications in related disciplines such as nursing and health services management.
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering studies up to May 15th, 2023. Inclusion criteria were studies involving undergraduate students in clinical and health disciplines (e.g., medicine, nursing, health services management) using BOPPPS, comparing it to traditional teaching methods, and reporting on relevant outcomes. Exclusion criteria were studies not focused on clinical and health education or without a comparison group. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for non-randomized studies and the Jadad scale for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using the I² statistic and Cochran's Q test. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test.
A total of 146 publications were initially retrieved, with 16 studies (1198 in the BOPPPS group and 1122 in the control group) included. The pooled result revealed that BOPPPS significantly improved final examination scores (Standardized mean difference: 1.14, 95% CI 0.84-1.43; P < 0.001) compared to traditional teaching. Egger's test indicated no significant publication bias (p-value = 0.12). Additional benefits included improved student satisfaction (SMD 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.26; P < 0.001), classroom interaction (SMD 0.83, 95% CI 0.46-1.21; P < 0.001), and learning initiative (SMD 0.73, 95% CI 0.48-0.98; P < 0.001).
BOPPPS demonstrates significant potential for enhancing various dimensions of clinical and health education, including academic performance, student engagement, and satisfaction. Policymakers and educational leaders should consider integrating BOPPPS into teacher training and curriculum design to promote active learning and improve learning outcomes. However, further research is necessary to explore its effectiveness in diverse cultural and educational contexts, as well as its potential impact on developing higher-order cognitive skills like critical thinking and problem-solving skills. While these findings are generalizable to similar educational settings, caution is recommended when applying them to different cultural contexts.
BOPPPS(导入、目标、预评估、参与式学习、后评估、总结)已成为临床和健康教育中一种引人注目的替代方法,特别是在医学和护理教育领域。本研究旨在评估BOPPPS在临床和健康教育中的效果,主要侧重于医学教育,同时也考虑其在护理和卫生服务管理等相关学科中的应用。
使用PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行系统综述和荟萃分析,涵盖截至2023年5月15日的研究。纳入标准为涉及临床和健康学科(如医学、护理、卫生服务管理)本科生使用BOPPPS的研究,将其与传统教学方法进行比较,并报告相关结果。排除标准为不专注于临床和健康教育或没有对照组的研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)对非随机研究进行质量评估,使用Jadad量表对随机对照试验(RCT)进行质量评估。使用I²统计量和 Cochr an Q检验评估研究间的异质性。使用漏斗图和Egger检验评估发表偏倚。
最初检索到146篇出版物,纳入16项研究(BOPPPS组1198人,对照组1122人)。汇总结果显示,与传统教学相比,BOPPPS显著提高了期末考试成绩(标准化均差:1.14,95%CI 0.84-1.43;P<0.001)。Egger检验表明无显著发表偏倚(P值=0.12)。其他益处包括提高学生满意度(SMD 0.94,95%CI 0.63-1.26;P<0.001)、课堂互动(SMD 0.83,95%CI 0.46-1.21;P<0.001)和学习主动性(SMD 0.73,95%CI 0.48-0.98;P<0.001)。
BOPPPS在提升临床和健康教育的多个维度方面具有显著潜力,包括学业成绩、学生参与度和满意度。政策制定者和教育领导者应考虑将BOPPPS纳入教师培训和课程设计,以促进主动学习并改善学习成果。然而,有必要进一步研究其在不同文化和教育背景下的有效性,以及其对培养批判性思维和解决问题能力等高阶认知技能的潜在影响。虽然这些发现可推广到类似的教育环境,但在将其应用于不同文化背景时建议谨慎。