Marcombe Sebastien, Maithaviphet Santi, Reyburn Rita, Kunlaya Khamfong, Silavong Khambang, Hongvanthong Bouasy, Vanisaveth Viengxay, Sengsavath Viengphone, Banouvong Vilasack, Chindavongsa Keobouphaphone, Khamlome Boualam, Vajda Élodie A, Thomsen Edward, Finn Timothy, Lobo Neil F, Shortus Matthew
WHO, World Health Organization, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Center for Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology, Ministry of Health, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Malar J. 2025 Jul 2;24(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05435-1.
Laos aims to eliminate malaria by 2030, with residual transmission present in the south. Understanding how LLINs function in relation to vector and human behaviours, and linking this to epidemiological outcomes, is critical for improving vector control strategies. Integrating human behaviour observations (HBOs) with entomological and epidemiological data helps identify gaps in protection and inform national malaria programs.
Entomological surveillance of Anopheles mosquitoes was conducted alongside HBOs in both rainy (July-September 2022) and dry (February-April 2023) seasons. Nine villages with high malaria burden were surveyed across three ecotypes: villages, cultivation sites, and forested areas. Mosquitoes collected via indoor and outdoor human landing catches (HLCs) were identified morphologically. HBOs recorded spatial and temporal human presence and LLIN use. Human biting rates (HBR) were adjusted with HBO data to quantify spatial and temporal protection and identify gaps in protection. Anopheles indoor resting rates were also assessed.
Anopheles mosquitoes (n = 1012) belonging to 12 species were collected, with the highest numbers from cultivation sites (n = 511), followed by villages (n = 302) and forests (n = 198). During the dry season, more Anopheles were found in cultivation sites than villages, while this was reversed in the rainy season. Human behaviour adjusted biting rates, or exposure was highest outdoors, particularly between 18:00-22:00 and 03:00-06:00 in villages. LLIN use in villages prevented 42% of total Anopheles bites and 83% of indoor bites during sleeping hours. However, LLINs only reduced exposure by 26% at cultivation sites, where Anopheles were primarily biting outdoors.
This operational study demonstrates that peridomestic behaviours of both humans and Anopheles in Laos results in significant outdoor gaps in protection, especially in the early evening. High LLIN coverage remains essential for reducing indoor bites in villages. IRS may have limited impact due to the lack of indoor-resting vectors. Addressing these gaps requires innovative strategies. HBOs integrated with entomological data offer valuable insights into residual malaria transmission, particularly in outdoor and early evening settings, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions.
老挝的目标是到2030年消除疟疾,该国南部仍存在残余传播。了解长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)在与媒介及人类行为相关方面的作用,并将其与流行病学结果联系起来,对于改进媒介控制策略至关重要。将人类行为观察(HBOs)与昆虫学和流行病学数据相结合,有助于找出保护方面的差距,并为国家疟疾防治计划提供信息。
在雨季(2022年7月至9月)和旱季(2023年2月至4月),在进行人类行为观察的同时对按蚊进行昆虫学监测。在三种生态类型的九个疟疾负担较重的村庄进行了调查:村庄、耕种地和森林地区。通过室内和室外人饵诱捕法(HLCs)收集的蚊子进行形态学鉴定。人类行为观察记录了人类在空间和时间上的存在情况以及长效驱虫蚊帐的使用情况。利用人类行为观察数据调整人类叮咬率(HBR),以量化空间和时间上的保护情况,并找出保护方面的差距。还评估了按蚊的室内栖息率。
共收集到属于12个物种的按蚊(n = 1012只),其中耕种地捕获的数量最多(n = 511只),其次是村庄(n = 302只)和森林(n = 198只)。在旱季,耕种地发现的按蚊比村庄多,而在雨季情况则相反。经人类行为调整后的叮咬率,即暴露率在户外最高,尤其是在村庄的18:00 - 22:00和03:00 - 06:00之间。村庄中长效驱虫蚊帐的使用在睡眠时间预防了42%的按蚊叮咬和83%的室内叮咬。然而,在耕种地,长效驱虫蚊帐仅将暴露率降低了26%,在这些地方按蚊主要在户外叮咬。
这项实用性研究表明,老挝人类和按蚊在住宅周边的行为导致了显著的户外保护差距,尤其是在傍晚时分。高长效驱虫蚊帐覆盖率对于减少村庄内的室内叮咬仍然至关重要。由于缺乏室内栖息的媒介,室内滞留喷洒(IRS)的影响可能有限。解决这些差距需要创新策略。将人类行为观察与昆虫学数据相结合,为残余疟疾传播提供了有价值的见解,特别是在户外和傍晚环境中,强调了采取针对性干预措施的必要性。