Ministerio de Salud de Panamá (MINSA), Panama City, Panama.
Malaria Elimination Initiative (MEI), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, USA.
Malar J. 2023 Jan 25;22(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04453-1.
Although most of Panamá is free from malaria, localized foci of transmission persist, including in the Guna Yala region. Government-led entomological surveillance using an Entomological Surveillance Planning Tool (ESPT) sought to answer programmatically relevant questions on local entomological drivers of transmission and gaps in protection to guide local vector control decision-making.
The ESPT was used to design a sampling plan to answer priority programmatic questions about the appropriateness of Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) and spaces and times where humans remain exposed to Anopheles bites (gaps in protection) in the communities of Permé and Puerto Obaldía, Guna Yala. Adult Anopheles were sampled at three time points via human landing catches (HLCs) during the rainy and dry seasons (2018/2019). Human behaviour observations (HBOs) were conducted alongside HLCs to examine intervention use, indoor versus outdoor activity, and sleeping patterns. HLC and HBO data were integrated to evaluate HBO-adjusted human biting rate (HBR).
A total of 7,431 adult Anopheles were collected across both sites. Of the 450 specimens molecularly confirmed to species-level, 75.5% (n = 340) were confirmed as Anopheles Nyssorhynchus albimanus, followed by Anopheles (Ny.) aquasalis. Anopheles host seeking activity was demonstrated to be primarily exophagic throughout all sampling periods and in both communities. When adjusted with HBOs, exposure to mosquito bites was predominantly indoors and overnight in Permé (Nov, Mar), compared to predominantly outdoors in Puerto Obaldía (Nov, Mar, Jul). Differences in site-specific human-vector exposure profiles were due to contrasting cultural and lifestyle practices between Permé and Puerto Obaldía (possibly partly influenced by the absence of electricity in Permé), and lower LLIN use in Permé. This evidence supported a previously planned LLIN campaign alongside a social behaviour change communication (SBCC) strategy in the Guna Yala Comarca (Jul 2019), which increased LLIN use. In turn, this led to a reduction of indoor exposure to mosquito bites, and a shift to predominant outdoor exposure to mosquito bites.
ESPT-based question-driven planning and the integration of HBOs, intervention, and HLC data generated evidence towards answering the programmatic questions. This evidence enabled the characterization of site-specific human-vector exposure profiles, and the quantification of remaining gaps in protection. These data also provide important insights into remaining gaps in protection that must be addressed to further reduce human exposure to mosquito bites at these sites.
尽管巴拿马大部分地区没有疟疾,但仍存在局部传播的焦点,包括在 Guna Yala 地区。政府主导的使用昆虫学监测规划工具(ESPT)的昆虫学监测旨在回答关于当地传播的昆虫学驱动因素和保护差距的与计划相关的问题,以指导当地的病媒控制决策。
该 ESPT 用于设计一个抽样计划,以回答关于长效驱虫蚊帐(LLIN)的适当性以及在 Permé 和 Puerto Obaldía 社区(Guna Yala)中人类仍然容易受到疟蚊叮咬的空间和时间(保护差距)的优先计划问题。在雨季和旱季(2018/2019 年),通过人类降落捕获(HLC)在三个时间点对成年疟蚊进行采样。在 HLC 期间进行人类行为观察(HBO),以检查干预措施的使用、室内与室外活动以及睡眠模式。将 HLC 和 HBO 数据整合起来评估经过 HBO 调整的人叮咬率(HBR)。
在两个地点共采集了 7431 只成年疟蚊。在 450 只经分子确认为种级别的标本中,75.5%(n=340)被确认为疟蚊 Nyssorhynchus albimanus,其次是疟蚊(Ny.)aquasalis。疟蚊的宿主寻找活动在所有采样期间和两个社区均主要为外食性。当与 HBO 调整后,Permé(11 月、3 月)的蚊子叮咬暴露主要在室内和夜间,而在 Puerto Obaldía(11 月、3 月、7 月)则主要在室外。两个地点的人类与病媒的暴露特征不同,这是由于 Permé 和 Puerto Obaldía 之间存在文化和生活方式的差异(可能部分受到 Permé 缺乏电力的影响),以及 Permé 中 LLIN 的使用率较低。这一证据支持了在 Guna Yala Comarca(2019 年 7 月)计划进行 LLIN 运动以及社会行为改变沟通(SBCC)战略,这一战略增加了 LLIN 的使用。反过来,这导致室内蚊子叮咬暴露减少,蚊子叮咬的主要暴露转为室外。
基于 ESPT 的问题驱动规划以及整合 HBO、干预措施和 HLC 数据,为回答计划问题提供了证据。这些证据使我们能够描述特定地点的人类与病媒的暴露特征,并量化保护方面的差距。这些数据还为进一步减少这些地点的人类对蚊子叮咬的暴露提供了重要的见解,需要解决保护方面的剩余差距。