Clark Katharine T, McFadden Kathleen, Krauss Benjamin A, Driver Lachlan, Ma Irene W, Vivian Rachel, Gullikson Jamie, Selame Lauren, Huang Calvin K, Liteplo Andrew S, Shokoohi Hamid
Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85203. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85203. eCollection 2025 Jun.
To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of patient-performed lung ultrasound (P-PLUS) for telemedicine purposes.
This prospective observation study included patients over 18 years old who presented to a tertiary care hospital's emergency department. Patients were provided a five-minute instructional video on a US protocol of four lung zones and then performed the protocol while being monitored by a study investigator. The physician sonographer subsequently repeated the protocol. Two emergency physicians with US fellowship training blindly reviewed and independently rated image quality on a scale of one to five, with a score of three or more considered interpretable. Inter-rater reliability was estimated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests and chi-square tests were used to compare group differences.
A total of 56 patients (45% female) were enrolled, and 417 clips were analyzed. Ten (18%) participants worked in the medical field, and 44 (79%) had at least some college education. Forty (71%) regularly used technology at work, 52 (93%) had internet access at home, and the same number had access to smartphones. Patients reported high comfort in performing self-LUS (median score: 4, interquartile range (IQR): 3.5-5) and high willingness to perform US acquisition again in the future (median score: 4, IQR: 4-5). The proportion of interpretable images was similar between the two groups except for the left hemidiaphragm (90% of provider-obtained images were interpretable vs. 45% of patient-obtained images, P = 0.002). The majority of patient-obtained images were scored between three and four and classified as interpretable. Mean image scores were significantly higher for provider-obtained images (P < 0.05). Inter-rater reliability between the two raters was good (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)= 0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.84).
Patients can independently obtain interpretable LUS images in all views with minimal video-based instruction. The ability of patients to obtain interpretable LUS images with minimal tele-guidance, as well as their high levels of comfort and willingness to perform the procedure, support the potential use of P-PLUS in home-based and remote patient care.
评估患者自行进行肺部超声检查(P-PLUS)用于远程医疗的可行性和诊断准确性。
这项前瞻性观察研究纳入了前往三级医疗医院急诊科就诊的18岁以上患者。为患者提供了一个关于四个肺区超声检查方案的五分钟教学视频,然后患者在研究调查员的监测下执行该方案。随后,医师超声检查人员重复该方案。两名接受过超声专科培训的急诊医师对图像质量进行盲法评估,并独立地按照1至5分进行评分,3分及以上的图像被认为可解读。组内相关系数用于估计评分者间的可靠性。采用Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验和卡方检验比较组间差异。
共纳入56例患者(45%为女性),分析了417段影像片段。10名(18%)参与者从事医疗行业,44名(79%)至少接受过一些大学教育。40名(71%)在工作中经常使用技术,52名(93%)家中可上网,同样数量的人可以使用智能手机。患者报告在进行自我肺部超声检查时舒适度较高(中位数评分:4分,四分位间距(IQR):3.5 - 5分),并且未来再次进行超声检查的意愿较高(中位数评分:4分,IQR:4 - 5分)。除左半膈外,两组可解读图像的比例相似(提供者获取的图像中有90%可解读,而患者获取的图像中有45%可解读,P = 0.002)。大多数患者获取的图像评分为3至4分,并被归类为可解读。提供者获取的图像的平均评分显著更高(P < 0.05)。两名评分者之间的评分者间可靠性良好(组内相关系数(ICC)= 0.80,95% CI 0.76 - 0.84)。
患者通过最少的基于视频的指导,能够独立获取所有视图的可解读肺部超声图像。患者在最少远程指导下获取可解读肺部超声图像的能力,以及他们较高的舒适度和进行该检查的意愿,支持了P-PLUS在家庭和远程患者护理中的潜在应用。