Engel Sophia, Rosseland Leiv Arne, Smits Martijn, Skurtveit Svetlana O, Gran Jon Michael, Nordseth Trond, Røise Olav, Jacobsen Henrik B
Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Mind Body Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Aug;135(2):390-400. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.008. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
Previous studies document high rates of long-term opioid use (LTU) among trauma patients, without accounting for opioid prescription doses, frequency, and medical indications. Using detailed LTU criteria, this study aimed to construct a multistate model of peritraumatic opioid use and elucidate reasons for posttraumatic LTU.
This population-based cohort study links data from the 2015-2018 cohorts in the Norwegian Trauma Registry (n=24 224) with outpatient medication prescription records from the Norwegian Prescription Database for 1 yr before and 2 yr after injury. LTU was assigned upon receiving ≥900 morphine milligram equivalents within 90 days and another opioid prescription 91-180 days after any initial prescription; it ended after 180 days without opioid prescriptions, emigration, or death. Prescriptions to patients with LTU in the year after injury were screened for chronic pain and palliative care reimbursement codes, and for opioid maintenance treatment preparations.
Posttraumatic opioid prescriptions primarily increased as a result of short-term opioid use (STU), peaking at 38.2% and returning to pre-injury levels (5.4%) within 6 months. Increases in LTU were smaller (4.3% to 6.7%). Among patients with LTU in the year after injury (n=1946), 47.4% exhibited LTU and 18.3% STU in the 6 months pre-injury. Moreover, 36.0% were reimbursed for chronic pain medications, 5.9% for palliative care, and 13.1% received opioid maintenance treatment.
In our cohort, most patients with posttraumatic long-term opioid use had used opioids before injury, underscoring the need to address such use to minimise posttraumatic long-term opioid use. Few patients with long-term opioid use received palliative care or opioid maintenance treatment, indicating subacute and chronic pain as primary indications. As long-term opioid use for pain is highly controversial, findings emphasise a need for effective nonopioid alternatives.
既往研究记录了创伤患者中长期阿片类药物使用(LTU)的高发生率,但未考虑阿片类药物的处方剂量、频率和医学指征。本研究采用详细的LTU标准,旨在构建围创伤期阿片类药物使用的多状态模型,并阐明创伤后LTU的原因。
这项基于人群的队列研究将挪威创伤登记处2015 - 2018年队列(n = 24224)的数据与挪威处方数据库中受伤前1年和受伤后2年的门诊药物处方记录相链接。LTU的定义为在90天内接受≥900毫克吗啡当量,且在任何初始处方后91 - 180天有另一张阿片类药物处方;在180天内无阿片类药物处方、移民或死亡则LTU结束。对受伤后1年LTU患者的处方进行筛查,查看是否有慢性疼痛和姑息治疗报销代码以及阿片类药物维持治疗制剂。
创伤后阿片类药物处方主要因短期阿片类药物使用(STU)而增加,峰值为38.2%,并在6个月内恢复到受伤前水平(5.4%)。LTU的增加幅度较小(4.3%至6.7%)。在受伤后1年LTU的患者(n = 1946)中,47.4%在受伤前6个月表现为LTU,18.3%表现为STU。此外,36.0%的患者获得了慢性疼痛药物报销,5.9%获得了姑息治疗报销,13.1%接受了阿片类药物维持治疗。
在我们的队列中,大多数创伤后长期使用阿片类药物的患者在受伤前就已使用过阿片类药物,这突出了应对此类使用以尽量减少创伤后长期阿片类药物使用的必要性。很少有长期使用阿片类药物的患者接受姑息治疗或阿片类药物维持治疗,表明亚急性和慢性疼痛是主要指征。由于长期使用阿片类药物治疗疼痛存在高度争议,研究结果强调需要有效的非阿片类替代方案。