• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一项促进欧洲低语言能力移民和难民获得心理医疗保健的干预措施(全民心理健康):一项前后测跨国调查研究的研究方案

Evaluating an intervention to promote access to mental healthcare for low language proficient migrants and refugees across Europe (MentalHealth4All): study protocol for a pretest-post-test cross-national survey study.

作者信息

van Lent Liza G G, Hodakova Sona, Hanft-Robert Saskia, Mösko Mike, Rao Chiara, Kerremans Koen, Cox Antoon, Lázaro Gutiérrez Raquel, Temizöz Özlem, Mankauskienė Dalia, Biel Łucja, Di Maria Emilio, Schouten Barbara

机构信息

Communication Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Translation Studies, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 7;15(7):e095868. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095868.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095868
PMID:40623874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12258366/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Migrants and refugees with low language proficiency (LLP) in the dominant language of their host country have a higher risk of suffering from certain mental health disorders compared with non-migrant populations. They are also more likely to experience a lack of access to mental healthcare due to language-related and culture-related barriers. As part of the MentalHealth4All project, a digital multilingual communication and information platform was developed to promote access to mental healthcare for LLP migrants and refugees across Europe. This paper describes the study protocol for evaluating the platform in practice, among both health and/or social care providers (HSCPs) and LLP migrants and refugees.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a pretest-post-test cross-national survey study to evaluate the platform's effect evaluation (primary objective) and process evaluation (secondary objective). The primary outcomes (measured at T0, T2 and T3) are four dimensions of access to mental healthcare services: availability, approachability, acceptability and appropriateness of mental healthcare. Secondary outcomes (measured at T2) are: actual usage of the platform (ie, tracking data), perceived ease of use, usefulness of content, comprehensibility of information, attractiveness of content and emotional support. Participants will be recruited from nine European countries: Belgium, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Spain and the UK. Using convenience sampling through professional networks/organisations and key figures, we aim to include at least 52 HSCPs (ie, 6-10 per country) and 260 LLP migrants (ie, 30-35 per country). After completing a pretest questionnaire (T0), participants will be requested to use the platform, and HSCPs will participate in an additional personalised training (T1). Next, participants will fill out a post-test questionnaire (T2) and will be requested to participate in a second post-test questionnaire (T3, about 6-8 weeks after T2) to answer additional questions on their experiences through a brief phone interview (T3 is optional for migrants/refugees).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

For all nine countries, the ethical review board of the participating university (hospital) has assessed and approved the protocol. If successful, the MentalHealth4All platform will be made publicly available to help improve access to mental healthcare services, as well as HSCPs' cultural competencies in delivering such services, for any LLP migrants and refugees across Europe (and beyond). Findings will also be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

The 'MHealth4All project' was prospectively registered on Open Science Framework, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U4XSM.

摘要

背景

与非移民人群相比,在所在国主要语言方面语言能力较低(LLP)的移民和难民患某些心理健康障碍的风险更高。由于语言和文化相关障碍,他们也更有可能难以获得心理保健服务。作为“全民心理健康”项目的一部分,开发了一个数字多语言交流和信息平台,以促进欧洲各地LLP移民和难民获得心理保健服务。本文描述了在卫生和/或社会护理提供者(HSCPs)以及LLP移民和难民中实际评估该平台的研究方案。

方法与分析

我们将进行一项前后测跨国调查研究,以评估该平台的效果评估(主要目标)和过程评估(次要目标)。主要结果(在T0、T2和T3测量)是获得心理保健服务的四个维度:心理保健的可及性、易接近性、可接受性和适当性。次要结果(在T2测量)包括:平台的实际使用情况(即跟踪数据)、感知易用性、内容有用性、信息可理解性、内容吸引力和情感支持。参与者将从九个欧洲国家招募:比利时、德国、意大利、立陶宛、荷兰、波兰、斯洛伐克、西班牙和英国。通过专业网络/组织和关键人物采用便利抽样,我们的目标是至少纳入52名HSCPs(即每个国家6 - 10名)和260名LLP移民(即每个国家30 - 35名)。在完成预测试问卷(T0)后,将要求参与者使用该平台,HSCPs将参加额外的个性化培训(T1)。接下来,参与者将填写后测试问卷(T2),并被要求参加第二次后测试问卷(T3,在T2后约6 - 8周),通过简短电话访谈回答关于他们经历的其他问题(T3对移民/难民为可选)。

伦理与传播

对于所有九个国家,参与大学(医院)的伦理审查委员会已评估并批准了该方案。如果成功,“全民心理健康”平台将公开提供,以帮助改善欧洲各地(及其他地区)任何LLP移民和难民获得心理保健服务的情况,以及HSCPs提供此类服务的文化能力。研究结果也将通过同行评审期刊和会议进行传播。

注册详情

“MHealth4All项目”已在开放科学框架上进行前瞻性注册,DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/U4XSM。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2383/12258366/dec42dcfde7e/bmjopen-15-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2383/12258366/dec42dcfde7e/bmjopen-15-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2383/12258366/dec42dcfde7e/bmjopen-15-7-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating an intervention to promote access to mental healthcare for low language proficient migrants and refugees across Europe (MentalHealth4All): study protocol for a pretest-post-test cross-national survey study.评估一项促进欧洲低语言能力移民和难民获得心理医疗保健的干预措施(全民心理健康):一项前后测跨国调查研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 7;15(7):e095868. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095868.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
4
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
Access to mental healthcare for refugees, asylum seekers and migrants: an umbrella review of barriers.难民、寻求庇护者和移民获得心理保健服务:障碍的综合综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 8;15(6):e096267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096267.
6
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
7
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
8
Migrants Living in the United Kingdom and Their Perceptions of Participation in Health Research: A Mixed-Methods Study.居住在英国的移民及其对参与健康研究的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70337. doi: 10.1111/hex.70337.
9
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental health care for migrants in the Netherlands: A decolonial perspective.荷兰移民的心理健康护理:一种去殖民化视角。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 Aug 6;12:e86. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10038. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Uncovering multi-level mental healthcare barriers for migrants: a qualitative analysis across China, Germany, Netherlands, Romania, and South Africa.揭示移民的多层次精神卫生保健障碍:中、德、荷、罗、南非的定性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1593. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19046-z.
2
Communication in refugee and migrant mental healthcare: A systematic rapid review on the needs, barriers and strategies of seekers and providers of mental health services.难民和移民精神卫生保健中的沟通:寻求和提供精神卫生服务者的需求、障碍和策略的系统快速综述。
Health Policy. 2024 Jan;139:104949. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104949. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Digital Health for Migrants, Ethnic and Cultural Minorities and the Role of Participatory Development: A Scoping Review.
移民、少数民族和文化少数群体的数字健康以及参与式发展的作用:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 23;20(20):6962. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206962.
4
Access to Virtual Mental Healthcare and Support for Refugee and Immigrant Groups: A Scoping Review.难民和移民群体获得虚拟心理健康保健和支持:范围综述。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2023 Oct;25(5):1171-1195. doi: 10.1007/s10903-023-01521-1. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
5
Interventions to improve migrants' access to sexual and reproductive health services: a scoping review.改善移民获得性健康和生殖健康服务的干预措施:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jun;8(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011981.
6
Effects of a WHO-guided digital health intervention for depression in Syrian refugees in Lebanon: A randomized controlled trial.世卫组织指导的数字健康干预对黎巴嫩叙利亚难民抑郁症的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jun 23;19(6):e1004025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004025. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Assessing Virtual Mental Health Access for Refugees during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using the Levesque Client-Centered Framework: What Have We Learned and How Will We Plan for the Future?评估 COVID-19 大流行期间难民的虚拟心理健康服务:我们学到了什么,我们将如何规划未来?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):5001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095001.
8
The Patient Navigator: Can a systematically developed online health information tool improve patient participation and outcomes related to the consultation in older patients newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer?患者导航员:一个系统开发的在线健康信息工具能否改善新诊断为结直肠癌的老年患者的咨询参与度和相关结局?
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 25;22(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09096-6.
9
What Works in Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Routine Clinical Settings? A Rapid Realist Review and Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration.在常规临床环境中实施患者决策辅助工具的有效方法有哪些?国际患者决策辅助标准协作的快速务实综述和更新。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):907-937. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20978208. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
10
Development and Evaluation of a Digital Intervention for Fulfilling the Needs of Older Migrant Patients With Cancer: User-Centered Design Approach.开发和评估满足老年癌症移民患者需求的数字干预措施:以用户为中心的设计方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 26;22(10):e21238. doi: 10.2196/21238.