Ahn Jacob Yongsu, Sim Mabel Wan Chi, Foo Zann Sue Ting, Tan Kok Hian
SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute for Patient Safety & Quality, Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd, Singapore.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jul 2;18:2217-2231. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S487580. eCollection 2025.
This study aim was to assess patient safety leaders' perception of patient safety practices in the Asia-Pacific region based on Strategic Objectives of the Global Patient Safety Action Plan (GPSAP) Framework.
A self-assessment survey tool with quantitative and qualitative components was sent to patient safety leaders from 25 healthcare facilities in 17 countries participating in the Global Action for Leaders & Learning Organizations on Patient Safety (GALLOPS) initiative, the majority of which were from LMICs in the Asia-Pacific region. The survey, based on the GPSAP's 7 strategic objectives, covered 35 patient safety areas. Each area was rated on a scale from 1 (not established) to 5 (strongly established with good practices). The mean score of each strategic area, strategic objective, and overall strategic objective establishments were calculated. Good and sub-optimal practices of GALLOPS-participating countries were identified and tabulated according to GPSAP-defined patient safety strategies.
A total of 15 self-rated responses were received from patient safety leaders of 8 GALLOPS-participating Asia-Pacific countries' healthcare facilities. The overall mean scores of the establishment level of all self-assessed strategic objectives were: Singapore (3.84), Malaysia (3.66), South Korea (3.56), India (3.20), Sri Lanka (3.09), Indonesia (2.48), Nepal (2.12), Maldives (1.94). The total mean score of the establishment level of all healthcare facilities' strategic objectives was 2.99. Strategic Objective 3 - Safety of clinical processes had the highest mean score of 3.41, while Strategic Objective 4 - Patient and family engagement and Strategic Objective 7 - Synergy, partnership and solidarity had 2.60 and 2.72, having two lowest mean scores for all countries' healthcare facilities, respectively.
Our study revealed substantial differences in perception of patient safety practices across healthcare facilities of Asia-Pacific countries and across the strategic objectives. This helped to establish a baseline of patient safety landscape in Asia-Pacific and represented opportunities for promoting equity and sustainability in healthcare as well as improving patient safety system and culture.
本研究旨在根据全球患者安全行动计划(GPSAP)框架的战略目标,评估亚太地区患者安全领导者对患者安全实践的看法。
向参与全球患者安全领导者与学习组织行动(GALLOPS)倡议的17个国家的25家医疗机构的患者安全领导者发送了一份包含定量和定性部分的自我评估调查工具,其中大多数来自亚太地区的低收入和中等收入国家。该调查基于GPSAP的7个战略目标,涵盖35个患者安全领域。每个领域的评分范围为1(未建立)至5(通过良好实践牢固建立)。计算每个战略领域、战略目标和总体战略目标确立情况的平均得分。根据GPSAP定义的患者安全策略,确定并列出参与GALLOPS的国家的良好和次优实践。
共收到来自8个参与GALLOPS的亚太国家医疗机构的患者安全领导者的15份自评回复。所有自我评估战略目标确立水平的总体平均得分分别为:新加坡(3.84)、马来西亚(3.66)、韩国(3.56)、印度(3.20)、斯里兰卡(3.09)、印度尼西亚(2.48)、尼泊尔(2.12)、马尔代夫(1.94)。所有医疗机构战略目标确立水平的总平均得分为2.99。战略目标3——临床过程安全的平均得分最高,为3.41,而战略目标4——患者及家属参与和战略目标7——协同、伙伴关系和团结的平均得分分别为2.60和2.72,在所有国家的医疗机构中平均得分最低。
我们的研究揭示了亚太国家医疗机构之间以及不同战略目标对患者安全实践看法的显著差异。这有助于建立亚太地区患者安全状况的基线,并为促进医疗保健的公平性和可持续性以及改善患者安全系统和文化提供了机会。