• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient Safety Leaders' Perception of Patient Safety Practices in Eight Asia-Pacific Countries: Survey Based on the Global Patient Safety Action Plan Framework.亚太八国患者安全领导者对患者安全实践的认知:基于全球患者安全行动计划框架的调查
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jul 2;18:2217-2231. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S487580. eCollection 2025.
2
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Interventions for patients and caregivers to improve knowledge of sickle cell disease and recognition of its related complications.针对患者及护理人员的干预措施,以提高对镰状细胞病的认识及其相关并发症的识别能力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 6;10(10):CD011175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011175.pub2.
6
Tamoxifen for adults with hepatocellular carcinoma.他莫昔芬治疗肝细胞癌成人患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 12;8(8):CD014869. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014869.pub2.
7
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.用于减少贫困和脆弱性的无条件现金转移:对低收入和中等收入国家卫生服务利用及健康结果的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 15;11(11):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Progress of island health in the Maldives.马尔代夫岛屿健康状况的进展
Public Health Chall. 2023 Aug 12;2(3):e114. doi: 10.1002/puh2.114. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
COVID-19: Challenges and viewpoints from low-and-middle-income Asian countries perspectives.新冠疫情:来自亚洲低收入和中等收入国家视角的挑战与观点
J Saf Sci Resil. 2020 Dec;1(2):70-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
3
Frontline nurses' burnout and its associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea.韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间一线护士的倦怠及其相关因素。
Appl Nurs Res. 2022 Oct;67:151622. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151622. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
4
Prevalence of burnout among healthcare professionals in Singapore.新加坡医护人员的 burnout 患病率。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2022 Jul;51(7):409-416. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021338.
5
Navigating the health system in responding to health workforce challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Maldives (short case).应对 COVID-19 大流行期间卫生人力挑战的卫生系统导航:马尔代夫案例(短篇案例)。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 May;36(S1):182-189. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3136. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
6
Comparative Studies on Patient Safety Culture to Strengthen Health Systems Among Southeast Asian Countries.比较研究患者安全文化,以加强东南亚国家的卫生系统。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 12;8:600216. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.600216. eCollection 2020.
7
Why do some countries do better or worse in life expectancy relative to income? An analysis of Brazil, Ethiopia, and the United States of America.为什么一些国家在预期寿命方面相对于收入表现得更好或更差?对巴西、埃塞俄比亚和美利坚合众国的分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Nov 10;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01315-z.
8
Nurses' experiences of patient safety incidents in Korea: a cross-sectional study.韩国护士对患者安全事件的经历:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 31;10(10):e037741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037741.
9
Transforming concepts in patient safety: a progress report.转变患者安全理念:进展报告。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Dec;27(12):1019-1026. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007756. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
10
Status of patient safety culture in Arab countries: a systematic review.阿拉伯国家患者安全文化的现状:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 24;7(2):e013487. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013487.

亚太八国患者安全领导者对患者安全实践的认知:基于全球患者安全行动计划框架的调查

Patient Safety Leaders' Perception of Patient Safety Practices in Eight Asia-Pacific Countries: Survey Based on the Global Patient Safety Action Plan Framework.

作者信息

Ahn Jacob Yongsu, Sim Mabel Wan Chi, Foo Zann Sue Ting, Tan Kok Hian

机构信息

SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute for Patient Safety & Quality, Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd, Singapore.

出版信息

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jul 2;18:2217-2231. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S487580. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S487580
PMID:40625586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12230327/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aim was to assess patient safety leaders' perception of patient safety practices in the Asia-Pacific region based on Strategic Objectives of the Global Patient Safety Action Plan (GPSAP) Framework.

METHODOLOGY

A self-assessment survey tool with quantitative and qualitative components was sent to patient safety leaders from 25 healthcare facilities in 17 countries participating in the Global Action for Leaders & Learning Organizations on Patient Safety (GALLOPS) initiative, the majority of which were from LMICs in the Asia-Pacific region. The survey, based on the GPSAP's 7 strategic objectives, covered 35 patient safety areas. Each area was rated on a scale from 1 (not established) to 5 (strongly established with good practices). The mean score of each strategic area, strategic objective, and overall strategic objective establishments were calculated. Good and sub-optimal practices of GALLOPS-participating countries were identified and tabulated according to GPSAP-defined patient safety strategies.

RESULTS

A total of 15 self-rated responses were received from patient safety leaders of 8 GALLOPS-participating Asia-Pacific countries' healthcare facilities. The overall mean scores of the establishment level of all self-assessed strategic objectives were: Singapore (3.84), Malaysia (3.66), South Korea (3.56), India (3.20), Sri Lanka (3.09), Indonesia (2.48), Nepal (2.12), Maldives (1.94). The total mean score of the establishment level of all healthcare facilities' strategic objectives was 2.99. Strategic Objective 3 - Safety of clinical processes had the highest mean score of 3.41, while Strategic Objective 4 - Patient and family engagement and Strategic Objective 7 - Synergy, partnership and solidarity had 2.60 and 2.72, having two lowest mean scores for all countries' healthcare facilities, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed substantial differences in perception of patient safety practices across healthcare facilities of Asia-Pacific countries and across the strategic objectives. This helped to establish a baseline of patient safety landscape in Asia-Pacific and represented opportunities for promoting equity and sustainability in healthcare as well as improving patient safety system and culture.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在根据全球患者安全行动计划(GPSAP)框架的战略目标,评估亚太地区患者安全领导者对患者安全实践的看法。

方法

向参与全球患者安全领导者与学习组织行动(GALLOPS)倡议的17个国家的25家医疗机构的患者安全领导者发送了一份包含定量和定性部分的自我评估调查工具,其中大多数来自亚太地区的低收入和中等收入国家。该调查基于GPSAP的7个战略目标,涵盖35个患者安全领域。每个领域的评分范围为1(未建立)至5(通过良好实践牢固建立)。计算每个战略领域、战略目标和总体战略目标确立情况的平均得分。根据GPSAP定义的患者安全策略,确定并列出参与GALLOPS的国家的良好和次优实践。

结果

共收到来自8个参与GALLOPS的亚太国家医疗机构的患者安全领导者的15份自评回复。所有自我评估战略目标确立水平的总体平均得分分别为:新加坡(3.84)、马来西亚(3.66)、韩国(3.56)、印度(3.20)、斯里兰卡(3.09)、印度尼西亚(2.48)、尼泊尔(2.12)、马尔代夫(1.94)。所有医疗机构战略目标确立水平的总平均得分为2.99。战略目标3——临床过程安全的平均得分最高,为3.41,而战略目标4——患者及家属参与和战略目标7——协同、伙伴关系和团结的平均得分分别为2.60和2.72,在所有国家的医疗机构中平均得分最低。

结论

我们的研究揭示了亚太国家医疗机构之间以及不同战略目标对患者安全实践看法的显著差异。这有助于建立亚太地区患者安全状况的基线,并为促进医疗保健的公平性和可持续性以及改善患者安全系统和文化提供了机会。