• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估实验性欧洲生活质量婴幼儿人群(EQ-TIPS)描述系统:一项在工具开发中整合离散选择实验(DCE)调查的方案。

Assessing the experimental EuroQol toddler and infant populations (EQ-TIPS) descriptive system: a protocol integrating discrete choice experiment (DCE) surveys in instrument development.

作者信息

Craig Benjamin Matthew, Rivero-Arias Oliver, Devlin Nancy, Verstraete Janine

机构信息

Economics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA

Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 8;15(7):e100897. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100897.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100897
PMID:40633947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12243590/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The experimental EuroQol Toddler and Infant Populations (EQ-TIPS) instrument is currently under development as a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure for toddlers and infants aged 0-36 months. Using this protocol, researchers can conduct surveys with discrete choice experiments (DCEs) that examine the key properties of HRQoL instruments, specifically whether severity aligns with preferences across each attribute and the extent to which attributes influence choices. To demonstrate this protocol, we will conduct two waves of DCE surveys using different choice tasks and a common scenario (a 1-month health episode for a 1-year-old child).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In the first wave (a general population sample of 400 Australian adults; 14 kaizen tasks each), respondents will view a single EQ-TIPS-five-level (v3.0) profile for each task and be asked to make a series of choices that sequentially alleviate the child's health problems. Using this exploratory evidence, we will assess whether EQ-TIPS severity aligns with preferences and the extent to which each attribute level influences choices (ie, main effects). In the second wave (1000 Australian adults; 28 paired comparisons), respondents will see two EQ-TIPS profiles for each task and be asked to choose between them. Using this confirmatory evidence, we will compare the main effects and their uncertainty by wave. For each DCE, we will estimate a main-effects conditional logit model and test for differences in effects using cluster bootstrap techniques. As sensitivity analyses, we will evaluate the effects of task sequence, attribute order and sample size on uncertainty in each wave.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The independent review board at Includovate evaluated the application for ethical clearance and approved the study on 19 February 2025. To disseminate our findings, we will prepare multiple manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed journals and present highlights at scientific meetings, such as the EuroQol Plenary Meeting and the International Academy of Health Preference Research.

摘要

引言

实验性的欧洲生活质量量表婴幼儿版(EQ-TIPS)工具目前正在开发中,作为衡量0至36个月婴幼儿健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的指标。通过本方案,研究人员可以进行离散选择实验(DCE)调查,以检验HRQoL工具的关键特性,特别是严重程度是否与每个属性的偏好一致,以及属性对选择的影响程度。为了演示本方案,我们将使用不同的选择任务和一个常见场景(一名1岁儿童的1个月健康事件)进行两波DCE调查。

方法与分析

在第一波调查中(400名澳大利亚成年人的普通人群样本;每个样本有14个改善任务),受访者将查看每个任务的单个EQ-TIPS五级(v3.0)概况,并被要求做出一系列选择,以逐步缓解儿童的健康问题。利用这些探索性证据,我们将评估EQ-TIPS严重程度是否与偏好一致,以及每个属性水平对选择的影响程度(即主效应)。在第二波调查中(1000名澳大利亚成年人;28对比较),受访者将看到每个任务的两个EQ-TIPS概况,并被要求在它们之间进行选择。利用这些验证性证据,我们将按波次比较主效应及其不确定性。对于每个DCE,我们将估计一个主效应条件逻辑模型,并使用聚类自举技术检验效应差异。作为敏感性分析,我们将评估任务顺序、属性顺序和样本量对每一波不确定性的影响。

伦理与传播

Includovate的独立审查委员会评估了伦理批准申请,并于2025年2月19日批准了该研究。为了传播我们的研究结果,我们将准备多篇稿件在同行评审期刊上发表,并在科学会议上展示亮点,如欧洲生活质量量表全体会议和国际健康偏好研究学会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1597/12243590/c6d2a98c7155/bmjopen-15-7-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1597/12243590/494a5ae046ea/bmjopen-15-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1597/12243590/2159b6037d29/bmjopen-15-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1597/12243590/c6d2a98c7155/bmjopen-15-7-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1597/12243590/494a5ae046ea/bmjopen-15-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1597/12243590/2159b6037d29/bmjopen-15-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1597/12243590/c6d2a98c7155/bmjopen-15-7-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the experimental EuroQol toddler and infant populations (EQ-TIPS) descriptive system: a protocol integrating discrete choice experiment (DCE) surveys in instrument development.评估实验性欧洲生活质量婴幼儿人群(EQ-TIPS)描述系统:一项在工具开发中整合离散选择实验(DCE)调查的方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 8;15(7):e100897. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100897.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Health valuation protocol for dual discrete choice experiment (dual-DCE) surveys to estimate the effects of different scenarios and attributes on main effects.用于双重离散选择实验(dual-DCE)调查的健康估值协议,以估计不同情景和属性对主要效应的影响。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 22;15(2):e091097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091097.
4
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
5
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
6
Individual-level interventions to reduce personal exposure to outdoor air pollution and their effects on people with long-term respiratory conditions.个体层面的干预措施以减少个人接触室外空气污染及其对长期呼吸系统疾病患者的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 9;8(8):CD013441. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013441.pub2.
7
Does interdisciplinary group care for the treatment of endometriosis improve pain interference: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial at an urban academic medical centre.跨学科小组护理对子宫内膜异位症治疗的疼痛干扰改善情况:城市学术医疗中心一项试点随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e097372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097372.
8
Conservative, physical and surgical interventions for managing faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases.保守治疗、物理治疗和手术干预用于治疗伴有中枢神经系统疾病的成年人的粪便失禁和便秘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 29;10(10):CD002115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002115.pub6.
9
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin.皮肤婴儿血管瘤的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD006545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006545.pub3.
10
Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths.用于治疗儿童和青少年破坏性行为障碍的非典型抗精神病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 9;8(8):CD008559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008559.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Health valuation protocol for dual discrete choice experiment (dual-DCE) surveys to estimate the effects of different scenarios and attributes on main effects.用于双重离散选择实验(dual-DCE)调查的健康估值协议,以估计不同情景和属性对主要效应的影响。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 22;15(2):e091097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091097.
2
Measuring Effectiveness Based on Patient Experience (Instead of QALYs) in US Value Assessments.在美国价值评估中基于患者体验(而非质量调整生命年)衡量有效性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Feb;43(2):171-176. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01444-1. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
3
EuroQol Toddler and Infant Populations (EQ-TIPS): Age-Related Differences in Performance.
欧洲五维健康量表婴幼儿人群版(EQ-TIPS):不同年龄的表现差异
Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;11(8):1034. doi: 10.3390/children11081034.
4
The Performance of Kaizen Tasks Across Three Online Discrete Choice Experiment Surveys: An Evidence Synthesis.三次在线离散选择实验调查中的改善任务表现:证据综合。
Patient. 2024 Nov;17(6):635-644. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00708-4. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
5
Scale and rate heterogeneity in the EQ-5D-5L valuation.EQ-5D-5L 量表值的标度和率异质性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jul 13;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02271-w.
6
The reliability and validity of the isixhosa version of the euroqol toddler and infant populations (EQ-TIPS) health related quality of life instrument.南非科萨语版儿童生存质量测定量表(EQ-TIPS)的信度和效度。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Dec;23(4):598-610. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i4.63.
7
Defining treatment success in children with surgical conditions.定义手术治疗患儿的治疗成功标准。
Arch Dis Child. 2024 Apr 18;109(5):377-386. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326156.
8
Child health valuation protocol for a discrete choice experiment comparing paired comparison and kaizen tasks and estimating US EQ-5D-Y-3L values on an experience scale.儿童健康评估方案,用于离散选择实验比较配对比较和改善任务,并在体验量表上估计美国 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 24;13(10):e077256. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077256.
9
Using stated-preferences methods to develop a summary metric to determine successful treatment of children with a surgical condition: a study protocol.采用陈述偏好法制定综合指标以确定儿童手术治疗成功的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 9;12(6):e062833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062833.
10
Systematic Review of Conceptual, Age, Measurement and Valuation Considerations for Generic Multidimensional Childhood Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.系统评价:通用多维儿童患者报告结局测量的概念、年龄、测量和评估考虑因素。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Apr;40(4):379-431. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01128-0. Epub 2022 Jan 24.