A Smartphone Application to Measure Walking Cadence before Major Abdominal Surgery in Older Adults.

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative physical functional assessments (i.e., assessments that measure capability to perform physical activity) are integral to estimate perioperative risk for older adults. However, these assessments are not routinely performed in-clinic prior to surgery. Walking cadence, or the number of steps walked in a specified amount of time (i.e., steps/min), measures activity intensity and may be able to identify high-risk patients prior to surgery. Smartphones can measure walking characteristics and guide patients through remote functional assessments. Here, we assess feasibility, acceptability, and accuracy of Walk Test, a smartphone application designed to measure walking cadence.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of older adults prior to abdominal surgery and enrolled them remotely to perform at-home usual- and fast-paced walks with subsequent validation in-clinic. Each walk (usual- and fast-paced) was 2 min in duration. Feasibility was assessed if 80% of patients could perform all study procedures; acceptability was measured using the Post-Study Survey Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ); accuracy of our approach was assessed with Lin's concordance coefficient (CCC). activPAL thigh worn accelerometer worn during the in-clinic walk served as a gold standard comparison. We used the CCC to compare the at-home and in-clinic walks as performed by Walk Test.

RESULTS

We enrolled 41 participants (mean age 69 ± 5 years, 26 (63%) female); 88% (36/41) successfully completed entire study protocol including independent installation of the application, walk tests (at-home and in-clinic) and questionnaires. Median (interquartile range) overall score of PSSUQ was 1 (1, 1) indicating strong acceptability and usability. The Lin's CCC between the in-clinic activPAL and Walk Test for usual-paced walk was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99, < 0.001) and for fast-paced walks 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.98, < 0.001). The CCC between the at-home and in-clinic walks for usual-paced walks was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.53, 0.86) and for fast-paced walks was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.21, 0.72).

CONCLUSION

We successfully demonstrated the feasibility, acceptability and accuracy of Walk Test to measure walking cadence. Future work is needed to standardize walk test performance at-home to ensure consistency between in-clinic and at-home measures.