Suppr超能文献

与基于食管测量的用力程度相比,P0.1是支持机械通气时用力程度的不可靠测量指标:一项比较研究。

P0.1 is an Unreliable Measure of Effort in Support Mechanical Ventilation in Comparison With Esophageal-Derived Measures of Effort: A Comparison Study.

作者信息

Smits Florence E, Rietveld Petra J, Snoep Jacob W M, van der Velde-Quist Franciska, de Jonge Evert, Schoe Abraham

机构信息

All authors: Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2025 Aug 1;53(8):e1650-e1658. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006745. Epub 2025 Jun 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Respiratory effort should be assessed in patients on mechanical ventilation in support mode. With the insertion of esophageal balloons, it is possible to measure different parameters of effort, such as change in esophageal pressure (ΔPes), work of breathing (WOB), and pressure-time product (PTP). Although some studies advocate for the use of P0.1 as a measure of effort, there is significant controversy as it is considered more a measure of respiratory drive. This study investigates the correlation between P0.1 and esophageal-derived parameters of effort.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational comparison study.

SETTING

This study is conducted in the mixed medical-surgical ICU at the Leiden University Medical Center (Leiden, The Netherlands).

PATIENTS

Data were collected from 30 mechanically ventilated patients in spontaneous breathing mode.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

From each patient, a minimum of three different time frames of 5 minutes were used to collect the average values of P0.1, WOB, PTP, and ΔPes over this time frame. Statistical models accounting for repeated measurements were applied to assess correlations among these parameters. In total, 117 timeframes were analyzed from 39 patient cases. The analysis revealed poor correlations between P0.1, as measured in this study, and WOB ( R2 = 0.111), PTP ( R2 = 0.113), and ΔPes ( R2 = 0.034), whereas the esophageal-derived parameters showed high correlations with each other (PTP vs. WOB, R2 = 0.886; ΔPes vs. WOB, R2 = 0.848; and ΔPes vs. PTP, R2 = 0.876).

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated poor correlations between P0.1 and the other effort parameters, whereas strong correlations were observed among ΔPes, WOB, and PTP. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of monitoring tools to ensure appropriate assessment and management, and the importance of using esophageal catheters for accurate monitoring of respiratory effort, particularly in spontaneously breathing patients.

摘要

目的

对于处于支持模式的机械通气患者,应评估其呼吸努力情况。通过插入食管气囊,可以测量不同的努力参数,如食管压力变化(ΔPes)、呼吸功(WOB)和压力-时间乘积(PTP)。尽管一些研究主张使用P0.1作为努力程度的衡量指标,但存在很大争议,因为它更多地被认为是呼吸驱动力的一种衡量指标。本研究调查P0.1与食管衍生的努力参数之间的相关性。

设计

这是一项回顾性观察比较研究。

背景

本研究在荷兰莱顿大学医学中心的内科-外科混合重症监护病房进行。

患者

收集了30例处于自主呼吸模式的机械通气患者的数据。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

从每位患者中,至少选取三个5分钟的不同时间段,以收集该时间段内P0.1、WOB、PTP和ΔPes的平均值。应用考虑重复测量的统计模型来评估这些参数之间的相关性。总共分析了39例患者的117个时间段。分析显示,本研究中测量的P0.1与WOB(R2 = 0.111)、PTP(R2 = 0.113)和ΔPes(R2 = 0.034)之间的相关性较差,而食管衍生的参数之间显示出高度相关性(PTP与WOB,R2 = 0.886;ΔPes与WOB,R2 = 0.848;以及ΔPes与PTP,R2 = 0.876)。

结论

结果表明P0.1与其他努力参数之间的相关性较差,而在ΔPes、WOB和PTP之间观察到强相关性。这些发现强调了在确保进行适当评估和管理时,需要仔细考虑监测工具,以及使用食管导管准确监测呼吸努力的重要性,特别是在自主呼吸患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af3/12316126/f71dd819ef65/ccm-53-e1650-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验