• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测疼痛的PrePain问卷的开发与验证

Development and validation of the PrePain questionnaire for predicting pain.

作者信息

Gedin Filip, Hellerström Andreas, Blome Sebastian, Jensen Karin, Andreasson Anna, Lalouni Maria

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 9, D3, 17165, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Psychobiology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09044-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-09044-5
PMID:40646043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12254292/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and construct validity of the PrePain questionnaire in both the general population and a long-term pain population. The PrePain questionnaire is an 11-item self-administered tool that assesses current pain intensity, long-term pain history, and attitudes, emotions, and behaviors related to pain using a visual analog scale (VAS). This non-randomized observational study included 200 participants: 100 individuals with long-term pain and 100 without. Participants were recruited from a specialist pain rehabilitation clinic and via social media. The study involved baseline and follow-up assessments using the PrePain questionnaire, the Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI-14), and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). Statistical analyses included Spearman correlation for test-retest reliability, sign rank-test for sensitivity to change, Cronbach's α for internal consistency, principal component analysis for subscale analysis, and mixed-effects linear regression for test of criterion validity. A total of 187 participants completed the study. The PrePain questionnaire demonstrated acceptable face validity and moderate test-retest reliability (coefficients ranging from 0.58 to 0.73). Internal consistency was α = 0.63. Principal component analysis suggested a two or three-factor solution. Criterion validity was supported by significant correlations between PrePain items and SHAI-14 and CSQ catastrophizing, except for the pain sensitivity item. No significant changes were observed in the clinical group between baseline and follow-up assessments. The resuts provide preliminary evidence for the reliability of The PrePain questionnaire and its validity for assessing attitudes, emotions, and behaviors related to pain in both clinical and non-clinical populations. Further research is needed to explore its sensitivity to change and utility in clinical practice.

摘要

本研究旨在评估PrePain问卷在普通人群和长期疼痛人群中的心理测量特性及结构效度。PrePain问卷是一个包含11个条目的自填式工具,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估当前疼痛强度、长期疼痛史以及与疼痛相关的态度、情绪和行为。这项非随机观察性研究纳入了200名参与者:100名长期疼痛患者和100名无疼痛者。参与者从一家专业疼痛康复诊所和通过社交媒体招募。该研究涉及使用PrePain问卷、简短健康焦虑量表(SHAI - 14)和应对策略问卷(CSQ)进行基线和随访评估。统计分析包括用于重测信度的Spearman相关性分析、用于变化敏感性的符号秩检验、用于内部一致性的Cronbach's α分析、用于子量表分析的主成分分析以及用于效标效度检验的混合效应线性回归分析。共有187名参与者完成了研究。PrePain问卷表现出可接受的表面效度和中等的重测信度(系数范围为0.58至0.73)。内部一致性为α = 0.63。主成分分析表明存在两因素或三因素解决方案。除疼痛敏感性条目外,PrePain问卷条目与SHAI - 14及CSQ灾难化之间的显著相关性支持了效标效度。在临床组的基线和随访评估之间未观察到显著变化。这些结果为PrePain问卷的可靠性及其在临床和非临床人群中评估与疼痛相关的态度、情绪和行为的效度提供了初步证据。需要进一步研究以探索其对变化的敏感性及其在临床实践中的效用。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the PrePain questionnaire for predicting pain.用于预测疼痛的PrePain问卷的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09044-5.
2
The Ultrashort Mental Health Screening Tool Is a Valid and Reliable Measure With Added Value to Support Decision-making.超短心理健康筛查工具具有有效性和可靠性,并且具有附加价值,可以支持决策。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):59-70. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002718. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
4
Italian validation of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire in spinal pain: a useful tool for clinicians and physiotherapist (CEQ-I).意大利对脊柱疼痛可信度/预期问卷的验证:临床医生和物理治疗师的有用工具(CEQ-I)
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2025 Jun 21;16:20406223251324812. doi: 10.1177/20406223251324812. eCollection 2025.
5
Validity and reliability of the Flare-OA scale for hip and knee osteoarthritis in a Turkish population: item reduction with Rasch analysis.土耳其人群中用于髋膝关节骨关节炎的Flare-OA量表的效度和信度:基于拉施分析的条目简化
Rheumatol Int. 2025 Jul 3;45(7):163. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05914-3.
6
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.自闭症谱系知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.
7
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
Assessing the psychometric properties and validating the Portuguese version of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in Portugal.评估葡萄牙版INSPIRE员工支持个人康复量表的心理测量特性并进行效度验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07060-3.
9
Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Mask Usability Scale: A Measure of the Perceived Usability of N95 Respirators Among Healthcare Students and Staff.口罩可用性量表的心理测量特性评估:一项针对医护专业学生和工作人员对N95口罩感知可用性的测量。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Aug;81(8):4613-4626. doi: 10.1111/jan.16590. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
10
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting long-term pain by combining brain imaging, genetics and health questionnaire data with Swedish national registries using a prospective superstruct design.采用前瞻性超构设计,结合脑成像、遗传学和健康问卷数据以及瑞典国家登记处,预测长期疼痛。
Mol Pain. 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17448069241301628. doi: 10.1177/17448069241301628.
2
Pain Catastrophizing: How Far Have We Come.疼痛灾难化:我们已经取得了多大进展。
Neurol Int. 2024 Apr 26;16(3):483-501. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16030036.
3
Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球疾病、伤害和危险因素负担研究 2021 年,1990-2021 年全球 204 个国家和地区及 811 个次国家地区 371 种疾病和伤害的发病率、患病率、伤残损失生命年(YLDs)、伤残调整生命年(DALYs)以及健康期望寿命(HALE):系统分析
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):2133-2161. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00757-8. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
4
The biopsychosocial factors associated with development of chronic musculoskeletal pain. An umbrella review and meta-analysis of observational systematic reviews.与慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛发展相关的生物心理社会因素。观察性系统评价的伞状评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):e0294830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294830. eCollection 2024.
5
Are We Any Closer to Understanding How Chronic Pain Develops? A Systematic Search and Critical Narrative Review of Existing Chronic Pain Vulnerability Models.我们距离理解慢性疼痛的产生机制是否更近一步了?对现有慢性疼痛易感性模型的系统检索与批判性叙述综述
J Pain Res. 2023 Sep 14;16:3145-3166. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S411628. eCollection 2023.
6
Worse health-related quality of life, impaired functioning and psychiatric comorbidities are associated with excess mortality in patients with severe chronic pain.患有严重慢性疼痛的患者,其健康相关生活质量较差、功能受损和精神共病与死亡率增加有关。
Eur J Pain. 2022 May;26(5):1135-1146. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1938. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
7
Prevalence of chronic pain among adults in the United States.美国成年人慢性疼痛的患病率。
Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):e328-e332. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002291.
8
Productivity losses among people with back pain and among population-based references: a register-based study in Sweden.背痛患者与基于人群的对照组之间的生产力损失:瑞典一项基于登记册的研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 13;10(8):e036638. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036638.
9
Pain, nicotine, and tobacco smoking: current state of the science.疼痛、尼古丁与吸烟:科学现状
Pain. 2020 Aug;161(8):1688-1693. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001874. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
10
Pain Catastrophizing and Function In Individuals With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.疼痛灾难化与慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛个体的功能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin J Pain. 2019 Mar;35(3):279-293. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000676.