• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索本科医学教育中学生对渗透数字学习平台的看法及其对动机和包容性的影响。

Exploring student perceptions of the Osmosis digital learning platform in undergraduate medical education and its influences on motivation and inclusivity.

作者信息

Kulkarni Sanat, Lawson-Smith Erin, Mongan Laura, Westacott Rachel, Jackson Dawn

机构信息

College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):1041. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07591-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07591-z
PMID:40646512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12255063/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing incorporation of digital learning platforms has transformed pedagogical approaches in medical education. However, these tools are under-researched and under-theorised. In the 2022/23 academic year, an asynchronous, personalised digital learning tool (Osmosis) was provided to all medical students at one of the largest medical schools in the United Kingdom. We explored students' experience of digital learning platforms, including Osmosis, and their influences on student motivation and inclusion.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study of second to final year medical students at the University of Birmingham. Data were collected through 10 semi-structured interviews and one focus group. The fifteen participants were purposively sampled based on year group, gender, ethnicity, international student status, self-reported health challenges, caring responsibilities and financial difficulties. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using the Framework Method. Data were analysed through the lens of self-determination theory (SDT) which focuses on the psychological needs of autonomy, self-efficacy and interconnectedness for achieving intrinsic motivation.

RESULTS

Five overarching themes were identified in relation to digital learning tools: (1) navigating complexity within the digital learning environment, (2) benefits and pitfalls of autonomous digital learning, (3) efficiency and depth in learning and promoting self-confidence, (4) social influences on digital learning and (5) curriculum level considerations. Aligned to SDT, digital tools promoted students' autonomy, self-efficacy and relatedness thereby facilitating intrinsic motivation. Online tools, including the Osmosis platform, supported student inclusivity and accessibility, helping students overcome health and learning challenges. However, lack of formal guidance towards online platforms, misalignment to the local curriculum and concerns over reliability were key barriers to their use.

CONCLUSION

Digital learning tools play an increasingly important role within modern medical education, positively impacting student motivation and inclusion. Nevertheless, greater focus must be placed on providing local guidance in accessing such tools, alongside constructively aligning their integration with other elements of the curriculum. Retaining medical students is vital to the future of patient care and it is ever more critical that higher education institutions prioritise student motivation, inclusion and wellbeing. Optimising integration of digital learning platforms therefore may be one means of achieving this.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

数字学习平台的日益融入改变了医学教育的教学方法。然而,这些工具的研究和理论化不足。在2022/23学年,一种异步、个性化的数字学习工具(Osmosis)被提供给英国最大的医学院之一的所有医学生。我们探讨了学生对数字学习平台(包括Osmosis)的体验,以及它们对学生动机和包容性的影响。

方法

我们对伯明翰大学二年级至最后一年的医学生进行了一项定性研究。通过10次半结构化访谈和1次焦点小组收集数据。这15名参与者是根据年级、性别、种族、国际学生身份、自我报告的健康挑战、照顾责任和经济困难有目的地抽样选取的。访谈进行了录音、转录,并使用框架法进行了主题分析。数据通过自我决定理论(SDT)的视角进行分析,该理论关注实现内在动机的自主性、自我效能感和相互联系的心理需求。

结果

确定了与数字学习工具相关的五个总体主题:(1)在数字学习环境中应对复杂性,(2)自主数字学习的好处和陷阱,(3)学习的效率和深度以及增强自信心,(4)数字学习的社会影响,(5)课程层面的考虑因素。与自我决定理论一致,数字工具促进了学生的自主性、自我效能感和关联性,从而促进了内在动机。包括Osmosis平台在内的在线工具支持学生的包容性和可及性,帮助学生克服健康和学习方面的挑战。然而,缺乏对在线平台的正式指导、与当地课程不一致以及对可靠性的担忧是使用这些工具的关键障碍。

结论

数字学习工具在现代医学教育中发挥着越来越重要的作用,对学生的动机和包容性产生积极影响。然而,必须更加注重提供使用此类工具的本地指导,同时建设性地使其与课程的其他要素相协调。留住医学生对患者护理的未来至关重要,高等教育机构将学生的动机、包容性和福祉作为优先事项变得更加关键。因此,优化数字学习平台的整合可能是实现这一目标的一种手段。

临床试验编号

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd37/12255063/d6c367a47158/12909_2025_7591_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd37/12255063/d6c367a47158/12909_2025_7591_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd37/12255063/d6c367a47158/12909_2025_7591_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring student perceptions of the Osmosis digital learning platform in undergraduate medical education and its influences on motivation and inclusivity.探索本科医学教育中学生对渗透数字学习平台的看法及其对动机和包容性的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):1041. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07591-z.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
4
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
The student voice in quality assurance: what factors make for a great GP placement in the eyes of undergraduate medical students?学生在质量保证中的声音:在本科医学生眼中,哪些因素造就了出色的全科医生实习经历?
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07500-4.
7
The cognitive and psychosocial effects of online learning in medical students during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study from Karachi, Pakistan.新冠疫情期间及之后在线学习对医学生的认知和社会心理影响:来自巴基斯坦卡拉奇的一项混合方法研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07334-0.
8
Increasing motivation and well-being among medical students using curricular self-experience group sessions-a randomized controlled trial.采用课程自我体验小组课程提高医学生的动机和幸福感——一项随机对照试验
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2519386. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2519386. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
9
Impact of medical school on quality of life and mental health in Brazil: a cross-sectional comparative study.医学院对巴西生活质量和心理健康的影响:一项横断面比较研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e097917. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097917.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Medical students' perception of paid E-learning.医学生对付费电子学习的认知。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 10;20(3):e0317340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317340. eCollection 2025.
2
Looking Back on Digital Medical Education Over the Last 25 Years and Looking to the Future: Narrative Review.回顾过去25年的数字医学教育并展望未来:叙述性综述
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 19;26:e60312. doi: 10.2196/60312.
3
Medical Education in the Digital Era: A New Paradigm for Acquiring Knowledge and Building Communities.数字时代的医学教育:获取知识与构建社群的新范式。
JACC Adv. 2022 May 26;1(2):100031. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100031. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
The evaluation of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: student experience, learning outcomes, and cognitive load.同步和异步在线学习的评估:学生体验、学习成果和认知负荷。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05311-7.
5
Twelve tips for using synchronous virtual classroom technologies in medical education.医学教育中使用同步虚拟课堂技术的十二条建议。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Mar 11;10:66. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000066.1. eCollection 2021.
6
A Curriculum Ignored? The Usage of Unofficial Commercial and Peer Learning Resources in Undergraduate Medical Education at a Canadian Medical School.一门被忽视的课程?加拿大一所医学院本科医学教育中非正式商业和同伴学习资源的使用情况
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Oct 9;33(6):1379-1388. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01899-5. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Online education isn't the best choice: evidence-based medical education in the post-epidemic era-a cross-sectional study.在线教育并非最佳选择:后疫情时代基于证据的医学教育——一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 10;23(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04746-8.
8
Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of E-Learning in Healthcare: A Fuzzy ANP Study.影响医疗保健领域电子学习效果的因素:一项模糊网络层次分析法研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 16;11(14):2035. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142035.
9
New era of medical education: asynchronous and synchronous online teaching during and after COVID-19.新的医学教育时代:新冠疫情期间及之后的异步和同步在线教学。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2023 Jun 1;47(2):272-281. doi: 10.1152/advan.00144.2021. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
Questions of Well-Being and Inclusion in Online Undergraduate Medical Education During COVID-19: A 2-Phased Focused Scoping Review.COVID-19 期间本科医学在线教育中的幸福感与包容性问题:一项两阶段的聚焦式范围综述
Acad Med. 2023 Apr 1;98(4):521-530. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005119. Epub 2022 Dec 12.