• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对橡胶添加剂斑贴试验反应呈阳性患者的评估:1996年至2023年土耳其的一项回顾性研究

Evaluation of Patients With Positive Patch Test Reactions to Rubber Additives: A Retrospective Study From Turkey Between 1996 and 2023.

作者信息

Aydoğdu İbrahim Halil, Özkaya Esen

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Nov;93(5):379-389. doi: 10.1111/cod.70000. Epub 2025 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1111/cod.70000
PMID:40650417
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503985/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rubber additives are common causes of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) worldwide, yet data from Turkey remain limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence of rubber additive sensitisation and its clinical/occupational relevance in a tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

A retrospective study on 2687 consecutively patch-tested patients with rubber additives at our allergy unit between 1996 and 2023.

RESULTS

Rubber sensitisation was found in 10.6%, with a slight increase after 2010. Male predominance was noted (female: male = 1:2.3). Thiurams and carbamates were the most frequent sensitizers. ACD was diagnosed in 7.9%, primarily caused by gloves (85.5%). Hands were most commonly affected (94.4%). Logistic regression analysis showed that thiuram and carbamate sensitisation was significantly associated with hand eczema, while benzothiazole derivatives were linked to foot eczema. Airborne ACD occurred in 4.2%, mainly in healthcare workers. Hand eczema with and without wrist extension was observed with similar frequency. Occupational ACD accounted for 79.3% of cases, especially among construction (56.8%) and healthcare workers (14.8%), with a relative increase in the latter group after 2015.

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence of sensitisation from rubber gloves is concerning. Legal measures are urgently needed, including safer additives and clearer glove labelling. Patch testing remains essential, even without the classic glove-pattern distribution.

摘要

背景

橡胶添加剂是全球过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)的常见病因,但来自土耳其的数据仍然有限。

目的

评估三级转诊中心橡胶添加剂致敏的患病率及其临床/职业相关性。

方法

对1996年至2023年间在我们过敏科连续接受橡胶添加剂斑贴试验的2687例患者进行回顾性研究。

结果

发现橡胶致敏率为10.6%,2010年后略有上升。男性占主导(女性:男性 = 1:2.3)。秋兰姆和氨基甲酸盐是最常见的致敏剂。诊断为ACD的占7.9%,主要由手套引起(85.5%)。手部最常受累(94.4%)。逻辑回归分析表明,秋兰姆和氨基甲酸盐致敏与手部湿疹显著相关,而苯并噻唑衍生物与足部湿疹有关。空气传播性ACD占4.2%,主要发生在医护人员中。有和没有手腕伸展的手部湿疹观察频率相似。职业性ACD占病例的79.3%,尤其是在建筑工人(56.8%)和医护人员(14.8%)中,后一组在2015年后相对增加。

结论

橡胶手套致敏的高患病率令人担忧。迫切需要采取法律措施,包括使用更安全的添加剂和更清晰的手套标签。即使没有典型的手套图案分布,斑贴试验仍然至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a684/12503985/5d669e28324e/COD-93-379-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a684/12503985/5ceaa0391a1f/COD-93-379-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a684/12503985/00fd5be349c5/COD-93-379-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a684/12503985/53a807d80e76/COD-93-379-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a684/12503985/5d669e28324e/COD-93-379-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a684/12503985/5ceaa0391a1f/COD-93-379-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a684/12503985/00fd5be349c5/COD-93-379-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a684/12503985/53a807d80e76/COD-93-379-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a684/12503985/5d669e28324e/COD-93-379-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Patients With Positive Patch Test Reactions to Rubber Additives: A Retrospective Study From Turkey Between 1996 and 2023.对橡胶添加剂斑贴试验反应呈阳性患者的评估:1996年至2023年土耳其的一项回顾性研究
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Nov;93(5):379-389. doi: 10.1111/cod.70000. Epub 2025 Jul 12.
2
Thresholds for Contact Allergy to a Rubber Accelerator: TETD-Determined by Serial Dilution Patch Testing and a Simulated Glove-Use Model.橡胶促进剂接触性过敏的阈值:通过系列稀释斑贴试验和模拟手套使用模型确定的二硫化四乙基秋兰姆(TETD)
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Aug;93(2):138-147. doi: 10.1111/cod.14817. Epub 2025 May 16.
3
Thiuram patch test positivity 1980-2006: incidence is now falling.1980 - 2006年硫脲类斑贴试验阳性率:目前发病率正在下降。
Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Apr;60(4):222-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01358.x.
4
Changing frequency of thiuram allergy in healthcare workers with hand dermatitis.手部皮炎医护人员中硫脲过敏的频率变化
Br J Dermatol. 2001 Feb;144(2):347-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04024.x.
5
Occupational skin disease among Australian healthcare workers: a retrospective analysis from an occupational dermatology clinic, 1993-2014.澳大利亚医护人员的职业性皮肤病:1993 - 2014年职业皮肤病诊所的回顾性分析
Contact Dermatitis. 2016 Oct;75(4):213-22. doi: 10.1111/cod.12616. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
6
Hand eczema and occupational contact allergies in healthcare workers with a focus on rubber additives.手部湿疹和医护人员的职业性接触过敏,重点是橡胶添加剂。
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Sep;79(3):149-156. doi: 10.1111/cod.13042. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
7
An Analysis of Skin Prick Tests to Latex and Patch Tests to Rubber Additives and other Causative Factors among Dental Professionals and Students with Contact Dermatoses.牙科专业人员和患有接触性皮炎的学生中乳胶皮肤点刺试验以及橡胶添加剂和其他致病因素斑贴试验的分析
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018;177(3):238-244. doi: 10.1159/000490181. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
8
Occupational rubber glove allergy: results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), 1995-2001.
Contact Dermatitis. 2003 Jan;48(1):39-44. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.480107.x.
9
Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Mercaptobenzothiazole in DS2 Dust Mask Straps During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study of Outbreak and Proposal of Safer Alternatives.COVID-19大流行期间DS2防尘口罩系带中巯基苯并噻唑引起的职业性变应性接触性皮炎:疫情研究及更安全替代品建议
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Aug 3. doi: 10.1111/cod.70007.
10
Allergic Contact Dermatitis of the Vulva.外阴过敏性接触性皮炎
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Sep;93(3):234-242. doi: 10.1111/cod.14816. Epub 2025 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The 'MOAHLFA(P) Index': An Attempt to Standardise a Widely Used Array of Descriptors of Patch-Tested Patients.“MOAHLFA(P)指数”:对广泛使用的斑贴试验患者描述符阵列进行标准化的尝试。
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Apr;92(4):251-260. doi: 10.1111/cod.14750. Epub 2025 Jan 12.
2
Contents of sensitising rubber accelerators in disposable rubber gloves: A Copenhagen market survey.一次性橡胶手套中致敏性橡胶促进剂的含量:哥本哈根市场调查
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Feb;92(2):131-136. doi: 10.1111/cod.14709. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
3
Cross-reactivity between thiuram disulfides and dithiocarbamates. A study of TETD and ZDEC using mouse models.
二硫化秋兰姆与二硫代氨基甲酸盐之间的交叉反应性。使用小鼠模型对双硫仑和代森锌的研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Feb;92(2):137-144. doi: 10.1111/cod.14706. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
4
In vitro characterisation of a novel rubber contact allergen in protective gloves.防护手套中一种新型橡胶接触性变应原的体外特性研究
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Jan;92(1):61-71. doi: 10.1111/cod.14682. Epub 2024 Aug 25.
5
2-Cyanoethyl dimethyldithiocarbamate, a new contact allergen found in accelerator-free nitrile gloves.2-氰乙基二甲二硫代氨基甲酸盐,一种在无加速剂的腈手套中发现的新型接触过敏原。
Contact Dermatitis. 2024 Jul;91(1):45-53. doi: 10.1111/cod.14553. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
6
Contact allergy to rubber accelerators in consecutively patch tested Danish eczema patients: A retrospective observational study from 1990 to 2019.连续斑贴试验丹麦湿疹患者的橡胶促进剂接触过敏:1990 年至 2019 年的回顾性观察研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2024 Feb;90(2):116-125. doi: 10.1111/cod.14421. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
7
Hand eczema in glove-wearing patients.戴手套患者的手部湿疹。
Contact Dermatitis. 2023 Sep;89(3):143-152. doi: 10.1111/cod.14357. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
8
Allergic contact dermatitis to accelerators in rubber gloves marketed as accelerator-free.市售宣称无促进剂的橡胶手套中促进剂引起的过敏性接触性皮炎。
Contact Dermatitis. 2023 Jul;89(1):65-68. doi: 10.1111/cod.14321. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
9
Skin lesions resulting from use of personal protective equipment in the context of COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间使用个人防护装备导致的皮肤损伤:一项横断面研究
J Wound Care. 2022 Dec 1;31(Sup12):S22-S28. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.Sup12.S22.
10
Contact dermatitis to undergarments.内衣接触性皮炎
Contact Dermatitis. 2023 Mar;88(3):234-236. doi: 10.1111/cod.14257. Epub 2022 Dec 9.