Kürkçü Kahraman Ezgi, Donma Orkide, Donma Mustafa Metin, Yılmaz Ahsen, Güzel Savaş
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Beykent University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Biochemistry, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2025 Aug;39(16):e70079. doi: 10.1002/jcla.70079. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
Although high-dose biotin interference in automated immunoassays is now considered, there are very few studies showing biotin interference in manually operated research kits, especially with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The aims of our study were to determine the effects of biotin interference on various parameters, including leptin, leptin receptor (LEPR), ghrelin, acylated ghrelin, deacylated ghrelin, ghrelin receptor (GHSR), kisspeptin (KISS1), kisspeptin receptor (KISS1R), preptin, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), nod-like receptor pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) and interleukin-18 (IL-18), which contribute to energy homeostasis in healthy and obese children.
Serum pools were prepared from healthy and obese individuals, and biotin concentrations in samples containing different amounts of biotin were measured via sandwich and competitive ELISA methods. In addition, possible biotin interactions were investigated by determining the concentrations of all the study parameters in serum pools containing different amounts of biotin.
We found that the biotin-competitive, ghrelin-competitive, KISS1-competitive, GHSR, leptin and LEPR ELISA kits were less affected by biotin interference and the results of these assay kits were more reliable. Unexpectedly, high levels were also measured in the biotin sandwich ELISA kit, indicating that biotin interference can also occur in manually operated assay kits.
Biotin exhibited an interference effect even in well-functioning, qualified kits, and this negative effect was less common in competitive kits. Biotin interference was closely associated with the quality of the research kit, the parameters studied, and the presence of high biotin concentrations in the blood.
尽管目前已考虑到高剂量生物素对自动化免疫测定的干扰,但很少有研究表明生物素对手动操作的研究试剂盒有干扰,尤其是酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)。我们研究的目的是确定生物素干扰对各种参数的影响,这些参数包括瘦素、瘦素受体(LEPR)、胃饥饿素、酰化胃饥饿素、去酰化胃饥饿素、胃饥饿素受体(GHSR)、亲吻素(KISS1)、亲吻素受体(KISS1R)、前动力蛋白、过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPARγ)、含吡啉结构域的NOD样受体3(NLRP3)和白细胞介素-18(IL-18),它们对健康和肥胖儿童的能量稳态有影响。
从健康和肥胖个体中制备血清库,通过夹心ELISA法和竞争ELISA法测量含有不同生物素量的样本中的生物素浓度。此外,通过测定含有不同生物素量的血清库中所有研究参数的浓度,研究可能的生物素相互作用。
我们发现生物素竞争、胃饥饿素竞争、KISS1竞争、GHSR、瘦素和LEPR ELISA试剂盒受生物素干扰的影响较小,这些试剂盒的结果更可靠。出乎意料的是,生物素夹心ELISA试剂盒中也检测到高水平,这表明生物素干扰也可能发生在手动操作的试剂盒中。
即使在功能良好、合格的试剂盒中,生物素也表现出干扰作用,且这种负面影响在竞争试剂盒中不太常见。生物素干扰与研究试剂盒的质量、所研究的参数以及血液中高生物素浓度的存在密切相关。