• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建灾害期间救援物资分配的概念框架:一项多方法定性研究。

Developing a conceptual framework for relief goods distribution during disasters: a multi-method qualitative study.

作者信息

Rezapour Ramin, Doroudi Taher, Azami-Aghdash Saber, Jafarzadeh Dariush, Derakhshani Naser

机构信息

Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Research Center for Health Management in Mass Gathering, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Jul 15;44(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-01016-9.

DOI:10.1186/s41043-025-01016-9
PMID:40665397
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Natural disasters and crises persistently affect human societies, often resulting in substantial loss of life and property. A major challenge during such events is the rapid and efficient distribution of relief goods to affected populations. This study aims to develop a Relief Goods Distribution Conceptual Framework (RGDCF) during disasters in Iran.

METHODS

This study was conducted in four phases. In the first phase, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify challenges in the distribution of relief goods and strategies for improvement. The second phase involved semi-structured interviews with national experts and stakeholders to examine the characteristics and requirements of an appropriate distribution framework for relief goods. In the third phase, drawing on the findings from the previous phases and expert panel discussions, an initial RGDCF was developed. Finally, in the fourth phase, the Delphi technique was employed to validate the proposed framework.

RESULTS

A review of 18 studies identified key challenges in the distribution of relief goods, including lack of coordination among responsible authorities, needs assessment problems, damage to infrastructure, financial challenges and management of public donations, lack of local community participation, weakness in disaster preparedness, and shortage of trained personnel. The RGDCF was developed, based on four core principles: pre-disaster preparedness, unified command and management, intersectoral coordination, and community engagement, with 15 operational requirements aimed at improving distribution efficiency and equity. The developed framework received an acceptable score in terms of its feasibility, alignment with higher-level documents, stakeholder acceptance, and flexibility.

CONCLUSION

The RGDCF offers a comprehensive approach to addressing the challenges in relief goods distribution, ensuring more efficient and equitable humanitarian response. Its feasibility, alignment with existing policies, and stakeholder acceptance highlight its potential for practical implementation, as well as providing a structured basis for monitoring, evaluating, and improving relief operations in disaster management.

摘要

背景

自然灾害和危机持续影响人类社会,常常导致大量生命和财产损失。此类事件中的一项重大挑战是向受灾民众迅速且高效地分发救济物资。本研究旨在构建伊朗灾害期间的救济物资分发概念框架(RGDCF)。

方法

本研究分四个阶段进行。第一阶段,开展全面的文献综述以确定救济物资分发中的挑战及改进策略。第二阶段,对国家专家和利益相关者进行半结构化访谈,以审视合适的救济物资分发框架的特征和要求。第三阶段,借鉴前两个阶段的研究结果及专家小组讨论,初步构建RGDCF。最后,在第四阶段,采用德尔菲技术验证所提出的框架。

结果

对18项研究的综述确定了救济物资分发中的关键挑战,包括责任当局之间缺乏协调、需求评估问题、基础设施受损、资金挑战及公众捐赠管理、当地社区参与不足、灾害准备薄弱以及训练有素人员短缺。基于四个核心原则构建了RGDCF:灾前准备、统一指挥与管理、跨部门协调以及社区参与,并有15项操作要求,旨在提高分发效率和公平性。所构建的框架在可行性、与上级文件的一致性、利益相关者接受度及灵活性方面获得了可接受的评分。

结论

RGDCF提供了一种全面的方法来应对救济物资分发中的挑战,确保更高效和公平的人道主义应对。其可行性、与现有政策的一致性以及利益相关者的接受度凸显了其实际实施的潜力,同时为灾害管理中救济行动的监测、评估和改进提供了结构化基础。

相似文献

1
Developing a conceptual framework for relief goods distribution during disasters: a multi-method qualitative study.构建灾害期间救援物资分配的概念框架:一项多方法定性研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Jul 15;44(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-01016-9.
2
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
3
The Ethiopian emergency medical team: its formation, progress, response experience and opportunities.埃塞俄比亚紧急医疗队:其组建、进展、应对经验及机遇
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;13:1542303. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1542303. eCollection 2025.
4
Reproductive health crisis amidst a natural disaster in Pakistan: A call to action.巴基斯坦自然灾害中的生殖健康危机:行动呼吁。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251344725. doi: 10.1177/17455057251344725. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
5
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
6
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
7
A Scoping Review of the Observed and Perceived Functional Impacts Associated With Language and Learning Disorders in School-Aged Children.一项关于学龄儿童语言和学习障碍相关的观察到的和感知到的功能影响的范围综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70086. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70086.
8
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
9
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Research on efficient relief logistics planning under massive natural disasters.大规模自然灾害下的高效救援物流规划研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 4;15(1):11595. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91024-w.
2
Developing a quality and safety assessment framework for Iran's military hospitals.为伊朗军队医院制定质量和安全评估框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):775. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11248-w.
3
A multi-period optimal distribution model of emergency resources for responding to COVID-19 under uncertain conditions.不确定条件下应对新冠肺炎疫情的应急资源多阶段优化分配模型
Heliyon. 2024 May 23;10(11):e31758. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31758. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
4
Disaster response strategies of governments and social organizations: From the perspective of infrastructure damage and asymmetric resource dependence.政府和社会组织的灾害应对策略:基于基础设施受损与资源依赖不对称视角
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 26;9(10):e20432. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20432. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Responding to Disasters: Training Can Overcome Issues in Disaster Response.应对灾害:培训可以克服灾害应对中的问题。
New Solut. 2023 Nov;33(2-3):104-112. doi: 10.1177/10482911231179916. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
Developing Iranian sub-national primary health care measurement framework: a mixed-method study.构建伊朗地方一级初级卫生保健评估框架:一项混合方法研究
Arch Public Health. 2023 Jun 1;81(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01108-0.
7
Critical Decision-Making Issues in Disaster Relief Supply Management: A Review.灾难救援供应管理中的关键决策问题综述。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jul 4;2022:1105839. doi: 10.1155/2022/1105839. eCollection 2022.
8
Building capacity for community disaster preparedness: a call for collaboration between public environmental health and emergency preparedness and response programs.建设社区灾害防范能力:呼吁公共环境卫生与应急准备及响应项目之间开展合作。
J Environ Health. 2012 Sep;75(2):24-9.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
10
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.CVI(内容效度指数)是内容效度的可接受指标吗?评估与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.