Ariza-Prota Miguel, Pérez-Pallarés Javier, Alfonso Lucía García, Angela Lanza Martínez, Torres-Rivas Héctor, Fernández-Fernández Luis, González Gutiérrez María de la Paz, Berríos-Hernández Mario, García-Clemente Marta, López-González Francisco
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Central University Hospital of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Asisa Lavinia Hospital (HLA), La Vega, Murcia, Spain.
Mediastinum. 2025 Jun 25;9:11. doi: 10.21037/med-25-11. eCollection 2025.
Accurate mediastinal restaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy is crucial for treatment planning. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), the standard technique, has limitations such as low diagnostic yield and false negatives, often requiring invasive mediastinoscopy. This study evaluates the performance of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC) as a potential alternative to EBUS-TBNA in mediastinal restaging following neoadjuvant therapy. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TMC, specifically focusing on diagnostic yield, false-negative rates, sample adequacy for molecular and immunohistochemical analyses, as well as the potential need for mediastinoscopy.
This prospective study was conducted on 22 NSCLC patients undergoing mediastinal restaging after neoadjuvant therapy from September 2023 to October 2024. Each patient underwent both EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TMC in the same procedure. Mediastinoscopy was performed only in cases where both EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TMC results were negative or non-diagnostic, serving as the reference standard.
EBUS-TMC demonstrated superior diagnostic sensitivity (95.45% 63.63%) and achieved sample adequacy for molecular and immunohistochemical analysis in 94.11% of cases compared to 29.41% for EBUS-TBNA. EBUS-TMC identified six additional malignancy cases and had fewer non-diagnostic results (4.5% 22.7%). No complications were reported for any procedure, and mediastinoscopy confirmed all negative EBUS-TMC cases as true negatives.
EBUS-TMC significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and sample adequacy for restaging NSCLC following neoadjuvant therapy, reducing the need for mediastinoscopy. Its integration into clinical practice could enhance patient outcomes, lower healthcare costs, and support personalized treatment strategies. This is the first study to demonstrate EBUS-TMC's transformative potential in thoracic oncology.
新辅助治疗后非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的准确纵隔再分期对于治疗方案的制定至关重要。支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检(EBUS-TBNA)作为标准技术存在局限性,如诊断率低和假阴性,常常需要进行侵入性纵隔镜检查。本研究评估支气管内超声引导下经支气管纵隔冷冻活检(EBUS-TMC)作为新辅助治疗后纵隔再分期中EBUS-TBNA潜在替代方法的性能。本研究比较了EBUS-TBNA和EBUS-TMC的诊断准确性,特别关注诊断率、假阴性率、分子和免疫组化分析的样本充足性以及纵隔镜检查的潜在需求。
本前瞻性研究于2023年9月至2024年10月对22例接受新辅助治疗后进行纵隔再分期的NSCLC患者进行。每位患者在同一次操作中同时接受EBUS-TBNA和EBUS-TMC。仅在EBUS-TBNA和EBUS-TMC结果均为阴性或无法诊断的情况下进行纵隔镜检查,将其作为参考标准。
与EBUS-TBNA的29.41%相比,EBUS-TMC显示出更高的诊断敏感性(95.45%对63.63%),并且在94.11%的病例中实现了分子和免疫组化分析的样本充足,而EBUS-TBNA为29.41%。EBUS-TMC额外发现了6例恶性肿瘤病例,非诊断性结果更少(4.5%对22.7%)。任何操作均未报告并发症,纵隔镜检查证实所有EBUS-TMC阴性病例均为真阴性。
EBUS-TMC显著提高了新辅助治疗后NSCLC再分期的诊断准确性和样本充足性,减少了纵隔镜检查的需求。将其纳入临床实践可改善患者预后、降低医疗成本并支持个性化治疗策略。这是第一项证明EBUS-TMC在胸科肿瘤学中变革潜力的研究。