Rich Darren, Daneman Nick, Lam Philip W
Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2025 May 29;10(2):179-185. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2024-0042. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection (OVIVA) trial demonstrated the efficacy of highly bioavailable oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of osteoarticular infections. However, there continues to be significant variability in practice. This study aimed to assess changes in oral antibiotic use in the treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) at a large academic hospital.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022, with a diagnosis of DFO. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received definitive oral antibiotic treatment during two timeframes (Pre-OVIVA publication: January 1, 2016, through February 28, 2019, and post-OVIVA publication: March 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022). Patients were excluded if they had another indication for long-term intravenous antibiotics, if they did not receive antibiotic treatment for osteomyelitis, or if they underwent amputation without the need for postoperative antibiotics.
A total of 145 patients were included in the analysis. (65 patients pre-OVIVA and 80 patients post-OVIVA). The majority of patients had a history of peripheral arterial disease (59%) and gangrene (66%) present on hospital admission. Use of definitive oral antibiotic therapy increased from 10.8% in the pre-OVIVA period to 21.2% in the post-OVIVA period ( = 0.14).
There was a trend toward increased definitive oral antibiotic therapy for DFO, but overall use remained low. Further studies are needed to explore the factors influencing the selection of oral antibiotic therapy in this population.
口服与静脉注射抗生素治疗骨与关节感染(OVIVA)试验证明了高生物利用度口服抗生素疗法治疗骨关节炎感染的疗效。然而,在实际应用中仍存在显著差异。本研究旨在评估一家大型学术医院在治疗糖尿病足骨髓炎(DFO)时口服抗生素使用情况的变化。
我们对2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日入住桑尼布鲁克健康科学中心且诊断为DFO的成年患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。主要结局是在两个时间段(OVIVA发表前:2016年1月1日至2019年2月28日,以及OVIVA发表后:2019年3月1日至2022年12月31日)接受确定性口服抗生素治疗的患者比例。如果患者有长期静脉注射抗生素的其他指征、未接受骨髓炎抗生素治疗或在无需术后抗生素的情况下接受了截肢手术,则将其排除。
共有145例患者纳入分析(OVIVA发表前65例,OVIVA发表后80例)。大多数患者入院时患有外周动脉疾病史(59%)和坏疽(66%)。确定性口服抗生素疗法的使用从OVIVA发表前的10.8%增加到OVIVA发表后的21.2%( = 0.14)。
DFO的确定性口服抗生素疗法有增加的趋势,但总体使用率仍然较低。需要进一步研究以探索影响该人群口服抗生素疗法选择的因素。