Melin J A, Wijns W, Robert A, Nannan M, De Coster P, Beckers C, Detry J M
J Nucl Med. 1985 Dec;26(12):1386-93.
A nongeometric radionuclide technique with correction for attenuation was used for the determination of cardiac output and stroke volume during exercise in nine normal subjects and in ten hypertensive patients. Simultaneous reference stroke volume (range 48-159 ml) and cardiac output (range 3.6-23.8 l/min) measurements were obtained by the Fick method. Data were collected at rest and during 60 degrees upright exercise, at two or three levels of increasing severity. Three statistical measurements were used for the comparison of both methods: correlation, precision, and accuracy. Radionuclide and Fick cardiac output measurements (n = 67, rest and exercise data) correlated well (r = 0.90). For stroke volume, the correlation was less (r = 0.64); however, the precision or random variability of both methods was similar for stroke volume (radionuclide: 8 ml or 9%; Fick: 16 ml or 16%). The accuracy or systematic error was defined as the mean difference between radionuclide and Fick measurements. The radionuclide method underestimated the Fick measurements. The systematic error was 18 +/- 18 ml for stroke volume and 2.4 +/- 2.4 l/m for cardiac output. A similar comparison of both methods was made on the absolute changes of stroke volume (r = 0.61; range -19 + 70 ml) and cardiac output (r = 0.82; range +1.6 + 16.4 l/m) between rest and exercise. The precision of the two methods was similar; the systematic error was 1.9 +/- 2.2 l/m for cardiac output and 6 +/- 17 ml for stroke volume. Thus, in these two groups of patients, although radionuclide and Fick cardiac output measurements at rest and during exercise correlated well, the radionuclide values were systematically and significantly lower.
一种采用衰减校正的非几何放射性核素技术,用于测定9名正常受试者和10名高血压患者运动期间的心输出量和每搏输出量。通过Fick法同时获得参考每搏输出量(范围48 - 159 ml)和心输出量(范围3.6 - 23.8 l/分钟)的测量值。在静息状态以及60度直立位运动期间,以两个或三个递增的严重程度水平收集数据。采用三种统计测量方法对两种方法进行比较:相关性、精密度和准确性。放射性核素法与Fick法的心输出量测量值(n = 67,静息和运动数据)相关性良好(r = 0.90)。对于每搏输出量,相关性稍低(r = 0.64);然而,两种方法对于每搏输出量的精密度或随机变异性相似(放射性核素法:8 ml或9%;Fick法:16 ml或16%)。准确性或系统误差定义为放射性核素测量值与Fick测量值之间的平均差值。放射性核素法低估了Fick测量值。每搏输出量的系统误差为18 ± 18 ml,心输出量的系统误差为2.4 ± 2.4 l/分钟。对静息和运动期间每搏输出量(r = 0.61;范围 - 19 + 70 ml)和心输出量(r = 0.82;范围 + 1.6 + 16.4 l/分钟)的绝对变化进行了两种方法的类似比较。两种方法的精密度相似;心输出量的系统误差为1.9 ± 2.2 l/分钟,每搏输出量的系统误差为6 ± 17 ml。因此,在这两组患者中,尽管静息和运动期间放射性核素法与Fick法的心输出量测量值相关性良好,但放射性核素值存在系统性且显著更低的情况。