Bragdon Cassandra, Siden Rachel, Winget Marcy, Harris Sonia Rose, Carey Rebecca, Ko Justin, Vyas Alpa, Brown-Johnson Cati
Evaluation Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.
School of Social Work University of Minnesota Saint Paul Minnesota USA.
Learn Health Syst. 2025 Jan 15;9(3):e10483. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10483. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Stanford Medicine is working to better coordinate care across the Stanford healthcare system, as well as improve patient and provider experiences in seeking and receiving care. This study aimed to explore the complexities of moving from a fragmented to an integrated academic healthcare system and to identify and explain factors (e.g., facilitators and barriers) of the implementation of three interventions meant to improve patient experience, reduce staff burden, and integrate health care systems across faculty and community settings.
We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews via Zoom with faculty and community physicians. Interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and open coding. Using consensus coding approaches, researchers met regularly to discuss themes and adaptations to CFIR.
We analyzed transcripts from interviews with physicians ( = 26). Factors impacting integration included the following: (1) physicians supported the interventions, promoting mission alignment; (2) physicians were motivated for change, reporting the existing system was intolerable; (3) physicians reported different priorities between clinics: faculty versus community and primary care versus specialty; (4) physicians prioritized interpersonal versus system solutions; (5) specialists were wary of unintended consequences of integration, specifically inappropriate bookings or patients being redirected to other clinics. Broadly speaking, facilitator factors 1-2 focused on the openness to, and tension for, change; and barrier factors 3-5 promoted or sustained variation across specialties and faculty/community clinics.
Our results illustrate the challenges and opportunities of moving from a fragmented to an integrated healthcare system and emphasize the importance of building shared culture, collaboration, and coordinated actions across and within an integrated healthcare network.
斯坦福医学致力于更好地协调斯坦福医疗系统内的医疗服务,同时改善患者和医疗服务提供者在寻求和接受医疗服务过程中的体验。本研究旨在探讨从分散的学术医疗系统向整合的学术医疗系统转变的复杂性,并识别和解释旨在改善患者体验、减轻工作人员负担以及整合跨教职员工和社区环境的医疗系统的三项干预措施实施过程中的因素(如促进因素和障碍)。
我们通过Zoom对教职员工和社区医生进行了定性半结构化访谈。访谈进行了录音、专业转录,并使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)和开放编码进行分析。研究人员采用共识编码方法,定期会面讨论主题以及对CFIR的调整。
我们分析了26名医生的访谈记录。影响整合的因素包括:(1)医生支持这些干预措施,促进使命一致;(2)医生有变革的动力,称现有系统无法忍受;(3)医生报告不同诊所之间存在不同的优先事项:教职员工诊所与社区诊所、初级保健诊所与专科诊所;(4)医生将人际解决方案与系统解决方案列为优先事项;(5)专科医生对整合的意外后果持谨慎态度,特别是不适当的预约或患者被转至其他诊所。总体而言,促进因素1 - 2侧重于对变革的开放性和变革带来的压力;障碍因素3 - 5促进或维持了各专科以及教职员工/社区诊所之间的差异。
我们研究结果说明了从分散的医疗系统向整合的医疗系统转变过程中的挑战和机遇,并强调了在整合的医疗网络内部和之间建立共享文化、协作及协调行动的重要性。