Suppr超能文献

关于外侧上髁炎的YouTube视频往往缺乏高质量、可靠的信息。

YouTube Videos on Lateral Epicondylitis Often Lack High-Quality, Reliable Information.

作者信息

Lin Jacob Q, Christopher Jacob, Khela Monty, Thuo Erastus, Khela Harmon, Chakkalakal Dennis

机构信息

Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, U.S.A.

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025 Apr 15;7(3):101150. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101150. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To measure the quality and reliability of information from YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis (LE).

METHODS

The first 50 videos obtained from a YouTube search for "lateral epicondylitis" were evaluated. Video reliability was assessed using the (JAMA) benchmark criteria (range 0-5). The videos' reliability and quality was evaluated using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range 0-4), and the Lateral Epicondylitis Specific Score (LESS). Analysis of variance was used to examine differences in reliability and quality across content types and uploaders. Multivariate stepwise regressions were conducted to understand how specific video characteristics influence JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores.

RESULTS

The 50 videos had a total viewership of 15,491,927, with an average of 309,838 views per video (range 1,492-2,814,670). Most videos focused on disease-specific information (40%). Nonphysician medical professionals created most of the content (56%), followed by physicians (28%). The mean JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores were 2.69 (±.59) of 4.0, 2.64 (±.87) of 5.0, and 4.91 (±1.0) of 7.0, respectively. Analysis showed that academic sources had greater LESS scores ( = .035); physicians had higher JAMA benchmark criteria scores than non-physicians ( = .025); nonphysicians had greater GQS than commercials ( = .031); and nonphysicians had greater VPI than physicians ( = .020). Linear regression analysis showed longer duration videos correlated with greater GCS scores (β: 0.656, < .001) and greater LESS (β: 0.614, < .001), whereas commercial content types had with lower GCS (standardized beta -0.280, = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

Although YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis have millions of views, the information covered had low to moderate quality and reliability as measured by JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Lateral epicondylitis is a common condition that patients may research online. As the content on YouTube is continually increasing and its popularity remains high, it is important to continually investigate the quality of information available on this platform.

摘要

目的

评估来自YouTube上与外侧上髁炎(LE)相关视频的信息质量和可靠性。

方法

对从YouTube搜索“外侧上髁炎”获得的前50个视频进行评估。使用《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准标准(范围0 - 5)评估视频可靠性。使用全球质量评分(GQS)(范围0 - 4)和外侧上髁炎特异性评分(LESS)评估视频的可靠性和质量。采用方差分析来检验不同内容类型和上传者之间在可靠性和质量上的差异。进行多元逐步回归分析以了解特定视频特征如何影响JAMA基准标准、GQS和LESS评分。

结果

这50个视频的总观看量为15491927次,每个视频平均观看量为309838次(范围1492 - 2814670次)。大多数视频聚焦于疾病特异性信息(40%)。非医生医学专业人员创作了大部分内容(56%),其次是医生(28%)。JAMA基准标准、GQS和LESS评分的平均值分别为4.0分中的2.69(±0.59)分、5.0分中的2.64(±0.87)分和7.0分中的4.91(±1.0)分。分析表明学术来源的LESS评分更高(P = 0.035);医生的JAMA基准标准评分高于非医生(P = 0.025);非医生的GQS高于商业广告(P = 0.031);非医生的视频信息实用性(VPI)高于医生(P = 0.020)。线性回归分析表明视频时长越长,GCS评分越高(β:0.656,P < 0.001)且LESS越高(β:0.614,P < 0.001),而商业内容类型的GCS较低(标准化β - 0.280,P = 0.045)。

结论

尽管与外侧上髁炎相关的YouTube视频有数百万的观看量,但根据JAMA基准标准、GQS和LESS衡量,所涵盖的信息质量和可靠性为低到中等。

临床意义

外侧上髁炎是一种患者可能会在网上搜索的常见病症。由于YouTube上的内容持续增加且其受欢迎程度居高不下,持续调查该平台上可用信息的质量很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/018e/12276575/3dbbf3fce34f/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验