Kaymakoglu Mehmet, Aksoy Taha, Kolac Ulas Can, Ozdemir Erdi, DePhillipo Nicholas N, Huri Gazi, Familiari Flippo
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 29;6(3):100921. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100921. eCollection 2024 Jun.
To assess the quality of YouTube videos for patient education on shoulder dislocation.
A standard YouTube search was performed in March 2023 using the terms "shoulder dislocation," "dislocated shoulder," and "glenohumeral joint dislocation" to identify eligible videos. Multiple scoring systems, including DISCERN (a validated tool for analyzing the quality of health information in consumer-targeted videos), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) were used to evaluate the videos. Video quality scores from various sources were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test for initial analysis, followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni correction, and the strength of relationship between variables was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
A total of 162 eligible videos were identified. The mean video duration was 11.38 ± 3.01 minutes, the median number of views was 653. Median number of days since upload was 1,972, the median view rate was 0.343, and median number of likes was 66.12. Based on the DISCERN classification, a substantial proportion of videos were classified as insufficient quality, with 19.4% as "very insufficient" and 42.1% as "insufficient"; 24.1% were classified as "average" quality, whereas only 13.1% were classified as "good" and 1.2% were "excellent." Videos from academic and professional sources showed a significant positive correlation with DISCERN scores (rho: +0.784, < .001) and greater scores on all 4 scoring systems compared to health information websites.
This study reveals that the majority of YouTube videos on shoulder dislocation lack sufficient quality for patient education, with content quality significantly influenced by the source.
Examining the accuracy of information that patients encounter on YouTube is essential for health care providers to direct individuals toward more reliable sources of information.
评估YouTube上有关肩关节脱位患者教育视频的质量。
2023年3月进行了一次标准的YouTube搜索,使用“肩关节脱位”“脱臼的肩膀”和“盂肱关节脱位”等术语来识别符合条件的视频。使用了多种评分系统,包括DISCERN(一种用于分析面向消费者的视频中健康信息质量的经过验证的工具)、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准和全球质量评分(GQS)来评估这些视频。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验对来自不同来源的视频质量评分进行初步分析,随后进行Dunn事后检验并进行Bonferroni校正,并使用Spearman等级相关系数评估变量之间的关系强度。
共识别出162个符合条件的视频。视频的平均时长为11.38±3.01分钟,观看次数的中位数为653次。自上传以来的天数中位数为1972天,观看率中位数为0.343,点赞数中位数为66.12。根据DISCERN分类,相当一部分视频被归类为质量不足,其中19.4%为“非常不足”,42.1%为“不足”;24.1%被归类为“中等”质量,而只有13.1%被归类为“良好”,1.2%为“优秀”。来自学术和专业来源的视频与DISCERN评分呈显著正相关(rho:+0.784,P<0.001),并且在所有4个评分系统上的得分均高于健康信息网站。
本研究表明,YouTube上大多数有关肩关节脱位的视频缺乏足够的患者教育质量,内容质量受来源的影响很大。
对于医疗保健提供者来说,检查患者在YouTube上遇到的信息的准确性至关重要,以便引导个人获取更可靠的信息来源。