Raplee Isaac D, Borkar Samiksha A, Yin Li, Venturi Guglielmo M, Shen Jerry, Chang Kai-Fen, Nepal Upasana, Sleasman John W, Goodenow Maureen M
Molecular HIV and Host Interactions Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 50 South Drive, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
BioTech (Basel). 2025 Jul 5;14(3):55. doi: 10.3390/biotech14030055.
Gene expression analysis is crucial in understanding cellular processes, development, health, and disease. With RNA-seq outpacing microarray as the chosen platform for gene expression, is there space for array data in future profiling? This study involved 35 participants from the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Intervention protocol. RNA was isolated from whole blood samples and analyzed using both microarray and RNA-seq technologies. Data processing included quality control, normalization, and statistical analysis using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests. Differential expression analysis and pathway analysis were conducted to compare the outputs of the two platforms. The study found a high correlation in gene expression profiles between microarray and RNA-seq, with a median Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.76. RNA-seq identified 2395 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), while microarray identified 427 DEGs, with 223 DEGs shared between the two platforms. Pathway analysis revealed 205 perturbed pathways by RNA-seq and 47 by microarray, with 30 pathways shared. Both microarray and RNA-seq technologies provide highly concordant results when analyzed with consistent non-parametric statistical methods. The findings emphasize that both methods are reliable for gene expression analysis and can be used complementarily to enhance the robustness of biological insights.
基因表达分析对于理解细胞过程、发育、健康和疾病至关重要。随着RNA测序作为基因表达的首选平台逐渐超越微阵列技术,阵列数据在未来的分析中还有空间吗?本研究纳入了35名参与青少年医学艾滋病干预试验网络协议的参与者。从全血样本中分离RNA,并使用微阵列和RNA测序技术进行分析。数据处理包括质量控制、标准化以及使用非参数曼-惠特尼U检验进行统计分析。进行差异表达分析和通路分析以比较两个平台的输出结果。研究发现微阵列和RNA测序之间的基因表达谱具有高度相关性,皮尔逊相关系数中位数为0.76。RNA测序鉴定出2395个差异表达基因(DEG),而微阵列鉴定出427个DEG,两个平台共有223个DEG。通路分析显示RNA测序有205条受干扰的通路,微阵列为47条,共有30条通路。当使用一致的非参数统计方法进行分析时,微阵列和RNA测序技术都能提供高度一致的结果。研究结果强调,这两种方法对于基因表达分析都是可靠的,并且可以互补使用以增强生物学见解的稳健性。