Edelbach Brandon M, Lubisich Jeffrey, Gospodarev Vadim, Elbadry Rasha, Hussain Namath
Neurological Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA.
Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Jun 23;17(6):e86600. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86600. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Endoscopic spine surgery offers a minimally invasive alternative to traditional microsurgical techniques across a spectrum of pathologies, namely discectomy, interbody fusion, and laminectomy, by leveraging small incisions, reduced tissue disruption, and direct visualization. Endoscopic discectomy yields shorter operative times, lower infection rates, and comparable pain and functional outcomes versus open microdiscectomy. Similarly, endoscopic laminectomy for lumbar stenosis provides equivalent decompression with less postoperative pain and faster mobilization than microscopic or open approaches. In the realm of interbody fusion, endoscopic techniques (including transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, lateral lumbar interbody fusion, and extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) variants) achieve fusion rates and radiographic corrections on par with minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques, while further minimizing blood loss, length of stay, and anesthesia exposure. We present a 67-year-old male patient with prior T10-11 and T11-12 fusions, hemilaminectomies, and dorsal column stimulator hardware who developed adjacent-segment L3-4 stenosis. An endoscopic XLIF was performed under fluoroscopic and neuromonitoring guidance. The patient experienced an uncomplicated procedure with immediate preservation of neurologic function and postoperative imaging confirming ideal cage placement and alignment. Endoscopic spine surgery, exemplified by this XLIF case, combines the benefits of MIS with an expanded view of the surgical field. With proper patient selection and adherence to evolving technical guidelines, these techniques continue to offer promising outcomes, reinforcing their role as a transformative modality in modern spine surgery.
内镜脊柱手术通过小切口、减少组织损伤和直接可视化,为一系列病理情况(即椎间盘切除术、椎间融合术和椎板切除术)提供了一种微创替代传统显微外科技术的方法。与开放式显微椎间盘切除术相比,内镜下椎间盘切除术的手术时间更短、感染率更低,疼痛和功能结果相当。同样,用于腰椎管狭窄症的内镜下椎板切除术与显微或开放手术方法相比,减压效果相当,但术后疼痛更少,活动恢复更快。在椎间融合领域,内镜技术(包括经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术、外侧腰椎椎间融合术和极外侧椎间融合术(XLIF)变体)的融合率和影像学矫正效果与微创外科(MIS)技术相当,同时进一步减少了失血量、住院时间和麻醉暴露。我们报告了一名67岁男性患者,既往有T10-11和T11-12融合术、半椎板切除术和背柱刺激器植入史,现出现相邻节段L3-4狭窄。在荧光透视和神经监测引导下进行了内镜下XLIF手术。患者手术过程顺利,神经功能立即得以保留,术后影像学检查证实椎间融合器放置理想且对位良好。以该XLIF病例为例,内镜脊柱手术将微创外科手术的优点与扩大的手术视野相结合。通过适当的患者选择和遵循不断发展的技术指南,这些技术继续提供有前景的结果,巩固了它们在现代脊柱手术中作为变革性术式的作用。