• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤中Lokomat辅助机器人康复:功能对称性和预测因素的生物力学与机器学习评估

Lokomat-Assisted Robotic Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Biomechanical and Machine Learning Evaluation of Functional Symmetry and Predictive Factors.

作者信息

Ilies Alexandru Bogdan, Cheregi Cornel, Thowayeb Hassan Hassan, Wendt Jan Reinald, Horgos Maur Sebastian, Lazar Liviu

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, Str. Piata 1 Decembrie nr. 10, 410087 Oradea, Romania.

Social Studies Department, King Faisal University, Hofuf 31982, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;12(7):752. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12070752.

DOI:10.3390/bioengineering12070752
PMID:40722444
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12292888/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lokomat-assisted robotic rehabilitation is increasingly used for gait restoration in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the objective evaluation of treatment effectiveness through biomechanical parameters and machine learning approaches remains underexplored.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from 29 SCI patients undergoing Lokomat-based rehabilitation. A dataset of 46 variables including range of motion (L-ROM), joint stiffness (L-STIFF), and muscular force (L-FORCE) was examined using statistical methods (paired -test, ANOVA, and ordinary least squares regression), clustering techniques (k-means), dimensionality reduction (t-SNE), and anomaly detection (Isolation Forest). Predictive modeling was applied to assess the influence of age, speed, body weight, body weight support, and exercise duration on biomechanical outcomes.

RESULTS

No statistically significant asymmetries were found between left and right limb measurements, indicating functional symmetry post-treatment ( > 0.05). Clustering analysis revealed a weak structure among patient groups (Silhouette score ≈ 0.31). Isolation Forest identified minimal anomalies in stiffness data, supporting treatment consistency. Regression models showed that body weight and body weight support significantly influenced joint stiffness ( < 0.01), explaining up to 60% of the variance in outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lokomat-assisted robotic rehabilitation demonstrates high functional symmetry and biomechanical consistency in SCI patients. Machine learning methods provided meaningful insight into the structure and predictability of outcomes, highlighting the clinical value of weight and support parameters in tailoring recovery protocols.

摘要

背景

Lokomat辅助机器人康复越来越多地用于脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的步态恢复。然而,通过生物力学参数和机器学习方法对治疗效果进行客观评估仍未得到充分探索。

方法

本研究分析了29例接受基于Lokomat康复治疗的SCI患者的数据。使用统计方法(配对t检验、方差分析和普通最小二乘法回归)、聚类技术(k均值)、降维(t-SNE)和异常检测(孤立森林)对包含运动范围(L-ROM)、关节刚度(L-STIFF)和肌肉力量(L-FORCE)在内的46个变量的数据集进行了检查。应用预测模型评估年龄、速度、体重、体重支持和运动持续时间对生物力学结果的影响。

结果

左右肢体测量之间未发现统计学上的显著不对称,表明治疗后功能对称(P>0.05)。聚类分析显示患者组之间结构较弱(轮廓系数≈0.31)。孤立森林在刚度数据中识别出极少的异常,支持治疗的一致性。回归模型表明,体重和体重支持对关节刚度有显著影响(P<0.01),可解释高达60%的结果方差。

结论

Lokomat辅助机器人康复在SCI患者中显示出高度的功能对称性和生物力学一致性。机器学习方法为结果的结构和可预测性提供了有意义的见解,突出了体重和支持参数在制定恢复方案中的临床价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/efbeaa8bc378/bioengineering-12-00752-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/7ff9ec45da92/bioengineering-12-00752-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/de79835ba9ff/bioengineering-12-00752-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/3ceecc7b04cb/bioengineering-12-00752-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/de3a86e46490/bioengineering-12-00752-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/a8dfcbf2d447/bioengineering-12-00752-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/51543d61dea8/bioengineering-12-00752-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/3d5eba3afe24/bioengineering-12-00752-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/806624ae7bff/bioengineering-12-00752-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/482cfb779337/bioengineering-12-00752-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/26c139dd41ce/bioengineering-12-00752-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/f87802256b5e/bioengineering-12-00752-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/9196f84888c2/bioengineering-12-00752-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/65346bcfa4d3/bioengineering-12-00752-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/fa54aaf5a91c/bioengineering-12-00752-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/418b0292b8a6/bioengineering-12-00752-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/6898378ccc69/bioengineering-12-00752-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/d4abf075decc/bioengineering-12-00752-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/f4a8a133a31f/bioengineering-12-00752-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/57ca3f5d226e/bioengineering-12-00752-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/53434b877388/bioengineering-12-00752-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/02726d2aae60/bioengineering-12-00752-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/61329d8085f5/bioengineering-12-00752-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/5506b6fb2e9e/bioengineering-12-00752-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/efbeaa8bc378/bioengineering-12-00752-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/7ff9ec45da92/bioengineering-12-00752-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/de79835ba9ff/bioengineering-12-00752-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/3ceecc7b04cb/bioengineering-12-00752-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/de3a86e46490/bioengineering-12-00752-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/a8dfcbf2d447/bioengineering-12-00752-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/51543d61dea8/bioengineering-12-00752-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/3d5eba3afe24/bioengineering-12-00752-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/806624ae7bff/bioengineering-12-00752-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/482cfb779337/bioengineering-12-00752-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/26c139dd41ce/bioengineering-12-00752-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/f87802256b5e/bioengineering-12-00752-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/9196f84888c2/bioengineering-12-00752-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/65346bcfa4d3/bioengineering-12-00752-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/fa54aaf5a91c/bioengineering-12-00752-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/418b0292b8a6/bioengineering-12-00752-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/6898378ccc69/bioengineering-12-00752-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/d4abf075decc/bioengineering-12-00752-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/f4a8a133a31f/bioengineering-12-00752-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/57ca3f5d226e/bioengineering-12-00752-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/53434b877388/bioengineering-12-00752-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/02726d2aae60/bioengineering-12-00752-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/61329d8085f5/bioengineering-12-00752-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/5506b6fb2e9e/bioengineering-12-00752-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4483/12292888/efbeaa8bc378/bioengineering-12-00752-g024.jpg

相似文献

1
Lokomat-Assisted Robotic Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Biomechanical and Machine Learning Evaluation of Functional Symmetry and Predictive Factors.脊髓损伤中Lokomat辅助机器人康复:功能对称性和预测因素的生物力学与机器学习评估
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;12(7):752. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12070752.
2
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with robotic-assisted body weight-supported treadmill training enhances motor score and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.经皮脊髓刺激联合机器人辅助体重支持跑步机训练可提高不完全性脊髓损伤患者的运动评分并促进步态恢复:一项双盲随机对照临床试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jan 30;22(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01545-8.
3
Assessing walking ability using a robotic gait trainer: opportunities and limitations of assist-as-needed control in spinal cord injury.使用机器人步态训练器评估行走能力:脊髓损伤中按需辅助控制的机会和局限性。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Sep 21;20(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01226-4.
4
Robot-assisted gait training in individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review for the clinical effectiveness of Lokomat.机器人辅助步态训练在脊髓损伤患者中的应用:Lokomat 的临床有效性系统评价。
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Sep;91:260-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.07.019. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
5
Kinetic Pattern Recognition in Home-Based Knee Rehabilitation Using Machine Learning Clustering Methods on the Slider Digital Physiotherapy Device: Prospective Observational Study.在基于家庭的膝关节康复中,利用滑块数字物理治疗设备上的机器学习聚类方法进行运动模式识别:前瞻性观察研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 18;9:e69150. doi: 10.2196/69150.
6
Releasing Forces in Adhesive Capsulitis Are Important Indicators of Shoulder Stiffness and Postoperative Function.粘连性肩周炎中的松解力是肩部僵硬和术后功能的重要指标。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 1;483(6):1033-1046. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003365. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
7
Development of a machine learning model and a web application for predicting neurological outcome at hospital discharge in spinal cord injury patients.开发用于预测脊髓损伤患者出院时神经功能结局的机器学习模型和网络应用程序。
Spine J. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.005.
8
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
9
Assessing and validating machine learning-enhanced imputation of admission American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grades for spinal cord injury.评估并验证机器学习增强的脊髓损伤患者入院时美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级量表评分的插补法
J Neurosurg Spine. 2025 May 9;43(1):90-97. doi: 10.3171/2025.1.SPINE241135. Print 2025 Jul 1.
10
Yoga for stroke rehabilitation.用于中风康复的瑜伽
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):CD011483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011483.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.脊髓损伤患者的机器人辅助步态训练:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Jun;48(3):171-191. doi: 10.5535/arm.230039. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
2
Direct Current Stimulation over the Primary Motor Cortex, Cerebellum, and Spinal Cord to Modulate Balance Performance: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.经颅直流电刺激初级运动皮层、小脑和脊髓以调节平衡能力:一项随机安慰剂对照试验
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Apr 4;11(4):353. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040353.
3
The effect of robot-assisted gait training for patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器人辅助步态训练对脊髓损伤患者的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Aug 22;17:1252651. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1252651. eCollection 2023.
4
Effects of end-effector robot-assisted gait training on gait ability, muscle strength, and balance in patients with spinal cord injury.末端执行器机器人辅助步态训练对脊髓损伤患者步态能力、肌肉力量和平衡的影响。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2023;53(3):335-346. doi: 10.3233/NRE-230085.
5
Advances in Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊髓刺激的进展
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;10(2):185. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020185.
6
Effect of Exercise Interventions on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.运动干预对纤维肌痛综合征患者健康相关生活质量的影响:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
J Pain Res. 2022 Nov 22;15:3639-3656. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S384215. eCollection 2022.
7
The Outcomes of Robotic Rehabilitation Assisted Devices Following Spinal Cord Injury and the Prevention of Secondary Associated Complications.脊髓损伤后机器人康复辅助设备的疗效和继发性相关并发症的预防。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 13;58(10):1447. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101447.
8
Effects of robotic-assisted gait training on motor function and walking ability in children with thoracolumbar incomplete spinal cord injury.机器人辅助步态训练对胸腰段不完全性脊髓损伤儿童运动功能和步行能力的影响。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2022;51(3):499-508. doi: 10.3233/NRE-220124.
9
Comparison of Efficacy of Lokomat and Wearable Exoskeleton-Assisted Gait Training in People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.脊髓损伤患者中Lokomat与可穿戴外骨骼辅助步态训练的疗效比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 13;13:772660. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.772660. eCollection 2022.
10
Settings matter: a scoping review on parameters in robot-assisted gait therapy identifies the importance of reporting standards.环境因素很重要:一项关于机器人辅助步态治疗参数的范围综述确定了报告标准的重要性。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Apr 22;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01017-3.